3D Mark 2001 and SiSoft Sandra

This content was originally featured on Amdmb.com and has been converted to PC Perspective’s website. Some color changes and flaws may appear.

AMD Athlon XP 1900+ Processor Review - Processors  1

It is interesting to see here that in the 16-bit color mode, there is nearly no difference seen between the two processors. With the 32-bit modes differing by 2.5%, I can’t see why the 16-bit resolution didn’t beat or at least mimic these results. But, with the frequency difference of only 70 MHz, you can’t expect too much difference in this gaming test.

AMD Athlon XP 1900+ Processor Review - Processors  2

I was pleasantly surprised by the increase in ALU memory speed here over the 1800+ processor. Over a 4% in memory performance gain from a frequency change is quite remarkable. The FPU memory results were not as successful, differing by only a percent or two.

AMD Athlon XP 1900+ Processor Review - Processors  3

As expected here, the CPU performance numbers scale to just below 5% better with the 1900+ processor than with the 1800+. This benchmark scales well with the Athlon XP processors.

« PreviousNext »