Bandwidth Testing – 5400UL

In the following tests, we perform some memory bandwidth measurements to determine the throughput of the modules. The numbers themselves aren’t very practical except for purposes of comparing different RAM.

Corsair XMS2 5400UL and XMS2 8000UL 1GB DDR2 Review - Memory  20
*Kingston @ 533 MHz, 4-4-4-12

In SiSoft Sandra 2005, we see a surprise. The older Kingston RAM actually performs extremely well compared to the 4-4-4-12 timings on the Corsair 5400UL. At 533 MHz, Kingston matches the 5400UL’s results of 667 MHz 4-4-4-12.

A bit of an oddity though, the results at 533MHz 4-4-4-12 on the 5400UL show it being slower than 5-5-5-15. This anomaly shows up again in the Everest test (below).

Corsair XMS2 5400UL and XMS2 8000UL 1GB DDR2 Review - Memory  21
*Kingston @ 533 MHz, 4-4-4-12

Corsair XMS2 5400UL and XMS2 8000UL 1GB DDR2 Review - Memory  22
*Kingston @ 533 MHz, 4-4-4-12

With reading and writing, the Everest test shows all results tightly clustered. The Corsair 5400UL appears to excel at read performance, while the Kingston shows strong write performance.

Corsair XMS2 5400UL and XMS2 8000UL 1GB DDR2 Review - Memory  23
*Kingston @ 533 MHz, 4-4-4-12

The latency test above is a good summary of the memory tests prior: the modern day module (Corsair) does not really have much to boast about except at lower memory timings.

« PreviousNext »