“AMD is preparing to replace its current processor numbering scheme for desktop processors with a new naming scheme which combines two letters and a four-digit number, according to Leslie Sobon, director of product and brand management in AMD.
AMD’s new naming scheme will start with a letter to indicate the product level; G represents premium product, B represents intermediate product and L represents value product. A second letter will indicate the product’s power consumption, with P representing over 65W, S around 65W and E less than 65W, noted Sobon.
The first digit of the proceeding four-digit number will indicate the product family; 1000 represents Sempron/Athlon single-core, 2000 represents Athlon dual-core, 6000 represents Phenom dual-core and 7000 represents Phenom quad-core. The second digit indicates relative core frequencies within the product family while the two remaining digits will be used for the future upgrade functions, pointed out Sobon.
As Intel’s processor lineup has also supported 64-bit technology since 2006, AMD decided to remove 64 out of its naming scheme to keep things simple, noted Sobon.
Newly released Athlon desktop processors have already started to switch to the new naming scheme including the Athlon X2 BE-2350 and Athlon X2 BE-2300, according to figures on AMD’s website.”
Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- Google Photos In Mountain View @ Phoronix
- Is Google Invading Your Privacy? @ PC Mechanic
- Another Alternative Broswer: Apple’s Safari @ PC Mechanic
- Alternative E-Mail Clients @ PC Mechanic
- DRM Pirates Helped in Ways They Didn’t Plan @ OCModShop
- Sanyo Xacti VPC-HD2 Review @ Digital Trends
- ViewSonic PJ258D iPod Projector @ I4U
- Computex 2007: Zaward @ techPowerUp
- Computex 2007: DFI @ techPowerUp
- Computex 2007: Winchip @ techPowerUp
- COMPUTEX 2007 :: Cooler Master factory tour @ HEXUS
- Computex 2007 – The Booth Babes @ The TechZone
- Computex 2007: Biostar @ techPowerUp
As you have heard Ryan mention on this weeks podcast, AMD is changing their processor naming scheme again. Now everyone is going to want a GP-7900, which would be a 65W+ Phenom quad-core, with a clock speed higher than the GP-7800, not that you can tell how much faster by the name. Time to start making decoder rings! DigiTimes has a bit more info here.