“Both Intel and NVIDIA have lots to say about their respective GPU architectures, as well as the competition’s. Partly because of this, there are numerous misconceptions floating around about both Larrabee and CUDA, so we decided to see if we could put to rest a few of the most common ones.”Here is some more Tech News from around the web:
- NVIDIA Responds To The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 @ TechARP
- Indie bands talk digital music and life without the labels @ Ars Technica
- Coming Soon: AMD R600 3D Documentation @ Phoronix
- Put Your Photo in System Properties @ PC Mechanic
- Why Internet Users Feel Entitled @ OCModShop
- Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10 Professional @ I4U
- Back to School Gift Guide @ Digital Trends
- Advice to Linux Users: Lock Down @ OSWeekly
- Email Archiving: Are You Doing It? @ OSWeekly
- Is Vista Really THAT Bad? @ OSWeekly
- Why Linux Continues to Evade Mainstream Users @ MadPenguin
- Wine-Doors for Linux Reviewed @ MadPenguin
- Using Cyberlink PowerDirector 7 @ [OC]ModShop
- Quakecon 2008: Wrap Up @ Virtual-Hideout
- ASUS Republic of Gamers Convention: Part 2 @ Techgage
- The ASUS Treasure Hunt – Win a HD4850 “TOP” Edition GPU @ OC3D
What we have here, is a failure to communicate
If you listened to the 35th podcast and weren’t sure what was meant by the questions that are being posed to Intel about Larrabee,
Techgage was nice enough to gather some of the more cogent questions into a quick summary. They stay away from the FUD mentioned by Ryan, which nVIDIA launched yesterday and choose to focus on more reasonable concerns. If you want a more technical take on the issue, then read through Josh’s article on Larrabee, which was also touched on.
