Testing Configuration and CineBench 10
Testing professional graphics boards is a much different beast that our reviews on consumer graphics solutions that focused nearly completely on gaming.  The user interested in a Quadro or Fire Pro card MIGHT be curious how the card performs in gaming, but in reality the decision to buy a card of this cost is based on other application performance: 3D modeling, CAD and design tools. 

My review of the Quadro CX card from NVIDIA was aimed at the professional video and image editor as that solution was directly targeted at the release of Adobe’s CS4 line of software.  In that article I looked at performance of the CX in Adobe Photoshop and in Premiere Pro with the Elemental Technologies based GPU accelerated video encoder.  So while the Quadro FX 4800 and the Quadro CX are essentially the same card under the hood, they are definitely aimed at different buyers and as such the FX 4800, along with all the cards in this review, will see different tests.

By far the most interesting tests for us with this kind of product are the SPEC series of benchmarks.  SPECviewperf has long been a staple for evaluating professional level application performance and the newest version enables us to test a multitude of results.  Applications like Maya, 3D Studio Max, SolidWorks and UGS NX are simulated as are several others; the benchmark allows us to easily test how the graphics cards help in scaling with multisampling as well as multi-threaded processing. 

I have also included a new version of the stand-alone 3D Studio Max SPECapc test that works with the latest 2009 version of the retail software.  This test runs through over 30 different scenarios and reports the time required to complete each operation.  Also, we have included the OpenGL portion of the CineBench 10 rendering benchmark and even given 3DMark Vantage a whirl for those of you really interested in out 2GB of frame buffer affects performance.

 Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 58 Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 59
 Quadro FX 4800


 Quadro FX 3700


 Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 60  Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 61
 Fire Pro v8700
 Fire Pro v5700

Test System Setup

CPU

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Motherboards

EVGA nForce 790i Ultra SLI Motherboard

Memory 

OCZ Technology 2 x 2GB DDR-1333

Hard Drive

Western Digital Raptor 150 GB – Review

Sound Card

Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Value

Video Card

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 1.5GB
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 512MB
AMD FirePro v8700 1GB
AMD FirePro v5700 512MB

Video Drivers

 NVIDIA Quadro 181.20
AMD FirePro 8.543
Power Supply PC Power and Cooling 1000 watt

DirectX Version

DX10 / DX9c

Operating System

Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit



CineBench 10


This rendering benchmark based off of the Cinema 4D engine is a terrific indicator for multi-threaded processing.

Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 62


Professional Graphics Roundup: NVIDIA Quadro and AMD FirePro - Graphics Cards 63

The CineBench 10 results show off a couple of interesting points: first that performance between the two graphics cards in the Quadro and FirePro series do not differ all that greatly.  The FX 4800 and FX 3700 score nearly the same and the FirePro v8700 and v5700 are also relatively close (within 5% or so).  As for the different series’ of cards, the AMD FirePro gets the slight performance win here over the NVIDIA-based Quadro series.

« PreviousNext »