AMD fills another price segment while NVIDIA waits
The new AMD Radeon HD 5830 continues to add to the company’s collection of DX11-ready graphics card hardware while we continue to wait and see what NVIDIA’s answer will offer consumers. The HD 5830 rests between the HD 5850 and the HD 5770 in terms of price and performance, but is it a better option than either? Also, we have some extra details on the upcoming HD 5870 Eyefinity Edition with 6 DisplayPort outputs!
IntroductionHow do enthusiasts love the AMD GPU team these days? Let us count the ways:
- ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB Graphics Card and AMD Eyefinity Review
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 1GB Review – Cyprus gets a bit cheaper
- AMD Radeon HD 5770 and HD 5750 Review – Juniper and DX11 for all
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 2GB Review – AMDomination
- AMD Radeon HD 5670 Review – DX11 breaches the $100 mark
- AMD Radeon HD 5570 and 5450 Review – DX11 HTPC Goodness
But will it be a better option for our readers than either abutting graphics card? That has yet to be seen.
Cypress gets another member: The Radeon HD 5830
First, I need to clarify a misspelling of mine that I have apparently had since the first HD 5870 release back in September – Cypress -> Cyprus. Really, can I be faulted? Apparently it really is “Cypress” so I’ll try to keep that straight from here on out.
In the world of AMD DX11-GPUs (Evergreen series) there are few different names you need to know. Cypress is the primary part, the GPU that holds up to 1600 stream processors that both the HD 5870 and HD 5850 are based on. The Juniper GPU is next and is completely different GPU spin that maxes out at 800 stream processors – about half the size and performance of the Cypress part – and is the basis of the HD 5770 and HD 5750 cards. Below that comes the Redwood GPU used in the HD 5670 and HD 5570 cards with up to 400 stream processors (half of the Juniper part) and we end with the Cedar GPU that powers the HD 5400 series of cards with at most 80 SPs.
All of that detail is give you a frame of reference for the new Radeon HD 5830 launching today that is based on the Cypress GPU but with significantly fewer stream processors enabled compared to the flagship HD 5870.
The clock speeds on the HD 5830 reference cards are pretty high – notably faster than the HD 5850 but not quite up to the HD 5870. What is interesting here is that the picture of the card is grayed out in an attempt to let us know that this card is going more along the route of the HD 5600/5500/5400 series and will focus on partner-designed boards rather than reference designs. So while AMD did send out reference graphics cards for early testing the retail cards will not look like our test sample shown on the coming pages. Performance should be right on course though.
This table gives us a lot of great information and also introduces some interesting questions behind the HD 5830. First you can see that this GPU, though priced much lower than the other HD 5800 cards, still holds 2.15 billion transistors though it will have a significant portion of them disabled. While the HD 5870 card is running with 1600 stream processing units the HD 5830 uses only 1120 (or 6 fewer SIMD engines) – a drop of about 40% of the raw computing power.
You will also see that AMD has cut back on the texture units and thus the texture fill rate drops by about the same percentage. However, look at the pixel fill rate difference here: it gets cut by more than half of the HD 5870 and in fact falls under that of the HD 5770 card that will be priced lower than the HD 5830. We are still using GDDR5 memory at the same clock rate of the HD 5850 so performance there is where we expected.
What does this mean? Essentially that while the performance of the HD 5830 should fall between the HD 5770 and HD 5850 in all cases, it will lean more towards the HD 5770 in areas that are pixel fill rate bound and more towards the HD 5850 where math computation is the bottleneck. At least in theory; we’ll see in our own testing on the following pages.
You will also see that AMD has cut back on the texture units and thus the texture fill rate drops by about the same percentage. However, look at the pixel fill rate difference here: it gets cut by more than half of the HD 5870 and in fact falls under that of the HD 5770 card that will be priced lower than the HD 5830. We are still using GDDR5 memory at the same clock rate of the HD 5850 so performance there is where we expected.
What does this mean? Essentially that while the performance of the HD 5830 should fall between the HD 5770 and HD 5850 in all cases, it will lean more towards the HD 5770 in areas that are pixel fill rate bound and more towards the HD 5850 where math computation is the bottleneck. At least in theory; we’ll see in our own testing on the following pages.
Finally, you will also note that the maximum power draw of the HD 5830 is actually HIGHER than that of the HD 5850. Even with a drop in shader count the additional 75 MHz of clock speed is obviously enough to make this iteration of the Cypress GPU a little more power hungry than its bigger brother.
This card should do a fine
This card should do a fine job of representing the 5830’s performance, but noise levels, GPU temperatures, and even power consumption may vary on the actual products. That hasn’t stopped AMD from offering power consumption estimates of 125W at peak and 25W when idle, though.