SSD 311 Raw Performance
Before putting our SSD 311 sample to use as a cache, we wanted to see how SLC flash behind the newer controller would stack up. This was an interesting combination of pluses and minuses, as the 311 is at a bit of a disadvantage with only 5 of the typical 10 internal data channels in use.
Since the SSD 311 is a bit ont he small size to be considered for solo OS usage, we saw it fitting to compare it with Iometer – one of the best tests for IOPS scaling at high queue depths. Below are our findings:
The 311 performs extremely well in all areas, matching the X25-M G2 160GB and SSD 320 Series 300GB models in nearly all areas. The SLC flash and newer controller was more than enough to overcome the performance weaknesses seen in other 5-channel designs (i.e. X25-V).
One note here: many of the newer Intel models easily dust the Intel 510 Series, which is the only Intel model equipped with a non-Intel (Marvell) controller.
Great Article.
Allyn, is
Great Article.
Allyn, is there any reason this wouldn’t work using one of OCZ’s PCIE Revo Drives?
It has to be a SATA SSD
It has to be a SATA SSD connected to the Z68.
Awesome job Allyn, thank you.
Awesome job Allyn, thank you.
Allyn, can a RAID 1+0
Allyn, can a RAID 1+0 configuration (4HDD) be used together with the SSD Caching ? OR 2HDD in RAID 1 with th SSD Caching?
Yes. From the Intel
Yes. From the Intel docs:
Intel® Smart Response Technology only support 1 HDD + 1 SSD or 1 RAID Partition + 1 SSD combination.
I’d put the RAID 10 on the 4 SATA 3Gb/sec ports, for consistency.
Hi Allyn,
I have just
Hi Allyn,
I have just installed my OCZ 64GB SSD and am using a Hitachi 1TB HD. All is working well, but I would like to know if other factors (normally used on SSDs alone) need to be addressed here too?
Some of these factors are: Sector Alignment, turning off Defrag, No Pagefile, etc.
Thanks,
Bernie
Allyn,
I noticed the Intel
Allyn,
I noticed the Intel 310 40 Gig SSD on the HW leader-board. It looks like this drive is more for Notebooks vs, desktops where size and low power isn’t as critical. Any idea why we should select this vs. something designed more for Desktops? I want to use this drive on a Z68 MB as a SMART scratch drive. What do you recommend for around $100?
Looking at getting most or all of items on High-end HW Leader Board.
Thanks,
Mike
Sandy Bridge motherboards
Sandy Bridge motherboards have UEFI support (not sure if all of them have it).
What I did was create a single volume 4 x 2tb raid 10 array, C & D partitions, installed Windows 7 with EFI boot on the GPT disk.
Walla Sandy Bridge Raid 10 boot with 60gb SSD caching both partitions on the single volume.
Seems to be an excellent
Seems to be an excellent performance boost with older slower drives, but suppose you use a 60GB SSD cache, a 120GB SSD drive for apps, and a larger SATA 3 for data?
Would this be a waste of hardware?
What if the smaller drive used as a cache read/writes at about 250 Mbps and the larger SSD for apps writes at around 500?
Would one be better off leaving the cache out of the mix?
Thanks in advance!
Quick questions:
1) what is
Quick questions:
1) what is faster, 2x HDD 7200Rpm in RAID or 1 HDD + small SSD for caching?
2) would a combination of 2x HDD 7200RPM in RAID + small SSD caching both be as fast as 2x SSD in RAID?
sorry, how can io access the
sorry, how can io access the option rom menu? generally it’s “ctrl+i” but not on my laptop. thanks.