Multi-Display Testing and Lucid Virtu Performance
As one of the two key new features on the Z68 chipset, switchable graphics is worth spending some time on. Yes, we have already previewed the Lucid Virtu software in a previous article, and unfortunately came away from that experience wanting a bit more. A bit cleaner interface, a bit better performance, a bit better overall experience. This time around we have the final 1.0.0 version at our disposal that fixes some things and even offers the ability to run your display off either the integrated or discrete graphics (previously it was integrated only).
While Intel has finally enabled users to enable both integrated and discrete graphics on an enthusiast class system, I find it interesting that they are dependent on third parties like Lucid and NVIDIA to provide the software to make this a good user experience. Without Virtu or the upcoming NVIDIA Synergy having both graphics enabled would without a doubt confuse the consumer that tried using them – either gaming performance would be well below expected (if using the Sandy Bridge processor graphics) or features like Quick Sync wouldn’t function (if using discrete). Intel usually either keeps these options unavailable or likes to perfect themselves before letting them out in the wild so it would appear that Intel is putting a lot of stock in the likes of Lucid and NVIDIA.
Multiple Displays – Use Case #1
The most basic use case of having a switchable graphics solution is to provide additional video outputs over and above the ones provided by a discrete graphics solution. Though AMD’s latest graphics cards can supply 3 displays at the minimum, the third requires a DisplayPort connection that very few monitors are using today and thus 2 might be the limit for your average consumer. NVIDIA’s cards (with the exception of the GTX 590 and a few boutique configurations) are also limited to two monitors per card. Using the Z68 chipset would allow the consumer to run display off of whatever connections the motherboard provides as well.
Here you can see I have attached a single monitor to the dual-link DVI output on the GTX 285 graphics card as well as one to the ASUS P8Z68-V Pro motherboard’s DVI output. The result is a system that can properly see both graphics cards, both drivers and operate on them smoothly, as long as you are running Windows 7.
While driver control panel compatibility is always a question mark, in this case both the latest NVIDIA and Intel GPU drivers are working side by side (literally) without any problems.
This functionality can exist WITHOUT the need for Virtu or Synergy running in the background (just like you could with the H67 chipset) though you are going to have issues either getting your games running at the full speed of your discrete graphics or running applications that take advantage of Quick Sync, etc. Which one will work correctly will depend on your BIOS settings and often times which GPU the OS decides to attach to first. With either switchable graphics software though, the idea is that you can get the best of both without the trouble of switching back and forth.
Gaming Performance – Use Case #2
Installing the Lucid Virtu software is about as easy as it gets – it is a small piece of software that requires a reboot to get working. After that, enabling and disabling it is as simple as right clicking on an icon in your task bar and switching them back and forth.
The software interface remains unchanged from our earlier look and could definitely use some refinement but the functionality is there. Notice the motherboard is listed at the bottom of the application window, an indicator that your board is properly detected by the Virtu software and is enabled correctly.
Here you can see all of the games and applications that Lucid has tested and enabled to work with Virtu out of the box. These applications have profiles that will enable them to run on the discrete GPU by default rather than on the slower processor graphics. The good news is that if your game isn’t listed or a new title is released before Lucid has the chance to release updated software, you can simply hit the Add button and find the executable file to include it on this list.
While we don’t recommend keeping the icon there permanently, seeing it placed on the screen when your application is running on the discrete GPU can help with troubleshooting and to make sure that your game is properly recognized by the software and that the "switch" in the switchable graphics is working in your favor.
To test Virtu yet again with this 1.0 release, we decided to use the same processor test bed but move the primary display output from the discrete card to the integrated graphics DVI port. Originally, this was a REQUIREMENT of Virtu but has since been altered. Let’s see how the performance of having the discrete-only setup compares to that of a Lucid Virtu switchable configuration.
While the 3DMark Vantage results look basically identical between the GTX 285 and the Virtu configuration, the F1 2010 and Left 4 Dead 2 results show a slight performance drop. More than likely due to the latency introduced when moving frames from the discrete GPU to the main system memory frame buffer for the Intel Sandy Bridge graphics to output, this drop was the reason Lucid worked to find a way to support connecting the display to the discrete card.
Intel Quick Sync – Use Case #3
Obviously the next thing to test if Lucid Virtu enabled us to take full advantage of Intel’s HD Graphics 3000 features while utilizing the gaming performance of the discrete GPU. For that we fired up a copy of the CyberLink Media Espresso application that allows us to use the Quick Sync video transcoding feature for incredibly fast video transcoding.
Here you can see our result for transcoding a large 1080p video file from a Canon 7D camera to a format compatible with the Apple iPad; 23 seconds is pretty good for this conversion.
In this screenshot you will see the time of 44 seconds that is the result seen when utilizing the discrete graphics on the GeForce GTX 285 and the best hardware acceleration that it can provide. At about 90% slower than the Intel integrated graphics hardware you can see why users were eager to be able to include this kind of acceleration in their computing landscape.
Finally here we see the results while using the Lucid Virtu software, in the same boot session as getting the much improved gaming performance of the GTX 285. You can see the 23 seconds here matches the performance we saw with the integrated-only configuration.
Obviously there are still some questions on the long term viability of this and other desktop switchable graphics software solutions. We are a bit confused as to why NVIDIA has delayed the release of its Synergy software that was mentioned in our material and even in BIOS’ of several motherboards we have been testing so it appears obvious that NVIDIA had planned on pushing this out today. Hopefully we’ll get hands-on with it soon so we can compare it to what Lucid has been able to provide with Virtu and maybe see some additional features added to this list.
















Finally, the NDA is over 😀
Finally, the NDA is over 😀
I will wait the ROG
I will wait the ROG motherboard from Asus for my next PC, lets hope the wait will be worth it.
No mention of USB-3 eh? What
No mention of USB-3 eh? What gives?
What do you mean? It is
What do you mean? It is mentioned on the second page of the review and the chipset itself continues to NOT implement it directly making it a motherboard vendors choice.
Additionally, I saw that in
Additionally, I saw that in the hardocp review they talk about having an issue where the processor wouldn’t do anything other than max frequency and idle frequency if there were any changes made to default bios settings (ie: it woudln’t scale between those properly. Did you guys notice this also? They say it isn’t a big deal but for me, even though I do intend to overclock, I also want to be as smart as possible with power usage. Details here, about 3/4 of the way down in the under the heading called “Note”: http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/05/11/asus_p8z68v_pro_z68_chipset_motherboard_review/4
Nope, I definitely did not
Nope, I definitely did not see this. When I overclocked the CPU manually or through the OC Tuner, it always clocked back down to the 1600 MHz idle state.
Yeah, it goes down to 1600
Yeah, it goes down to 1600 when idle but I think what they are saying is that it is either 100% or idle – never anything in between and apparently it should be hitting in between. Did you take a look at their article? I’m really close to buying this board when I am off work but I’m wondering whether this is an issue just with their board or if it is something that should make me look elsewhere.
Ah okay, interesting, I
Ah okay, interesting, I didn’t specifically see that or NOT see that either. I’ll take a look.
Thanks. I think they
Thanks. I think they basically are saying that turbo mode is always fully engaged any time the CPU isn’t idling. I’m planning on buying this board in about 5 hours so bang out that test. =)
I’ve noticed that MSI is
I’ve noticed that MSI is promoting their “Military Class” features and Giga-Byte is pushing their “Ultra Durable 3” stuff, with each of them talking about things like solid capaciters and other things that make the boards more durable and have a longer life expectancy. I don’t see any of this from ASUS; is this just a marketing failure on their side or do they not use the same quality of components etc that MSI and Giga-Byte do? Or is it not a big deal in the first place. I looked at their site and only the “Deluxe” Z68 board lists solid capacitors.
Side note: I posted this before but I must not have put the verification code in after submitting before closing the screen. Is there not a way to make the verification code be on-screen at the time I compose the post or will that make things bad for the site with spammers?
It looks like the DVI is
It looks like the DVI is single link. Can you confirm it is Dual? ie support 2560×1600?
Based on the pin layout it
Based on the pin layout it looks like Dual Link DVI-D to me.
Yes, it can handle 2560×1600
Yes, it can handle 2560×1600 resolutions without issue.
Here is a big question for me
Here is a big question for me which could get me to return a whole bunch of stuff i just bought – if you team an Nvidia graphics card like the GTX 560ti (which does not support 3x monitors without SLI) and combine it with this motherboard will you be able to use the 2 DVI on the 560ti and the 1 DVI on the motherboard and now have 3x monitors for a resolution like 5760×1080? This could be a big selling point for some people if they are debating Nvidia VS AMD because AMD is adding it as a standard feature on most cards if you buy the $30 adapter.
I’m going to add a second
I’m going to add a second part to my question that is only applicable if the answer to the first part was yes. If, in fact, you can do do nvidia surround (3x monitors) now without needing SLI thanks to this motherboard it would be great to see a comparison of a p67 + 6950 2GB @ 5760×1080 vs a z68 + 560ti @ 5760×1080.
Asus got TUF bot only for
Asus got TUF bot only for sabertooth.
I’m building a PC with mostly
I’m building a PC with mostly Corsair, ASUS P8Z-Pro, Intel 2500K, ect. I had problems with the LAN not working. The internet connection was On/Off, so returned it and got another new ASUS MB Pro and new 2500K from Fry’s, Guess waht the exact same thing. I called ASUS and the rep. said they had a big problem with that same issue and to get the Maxium MB instead?????