HDTune 4.01 (and ATTO)
HDTune tests a similar level of features that HDTach does, but with a slightly different access pattern and thus can provide us with an additional set of benchmark numbers to compare between storage configurations. Here we can get the minimum, maximum and average transfer rates as well as the burst rates and access times. CPU utilization has proven negligible with modern processing horsepower, and is no longer included.
Bursts paint the same picture as they did with HDTach.
HDTune does its sequential performance tests using much larger block sizes than HDTach. This enables the Z-Drive to pick up some significant steam against the rest of the playing field. 2.6GB/sec with a stream of large block reads. Note: these reads, while larger, are still only single threaded. We saw higher than 3GB/sec in ATTO:
For the record, that’s the highest I’ve ever seen ATTO go :).
This drive is so fast, that
This drive is so fast, that it can actually change the way programmers approach problems. With a disk speed a sizable fraction of RAM, I/O stops being a bottleneck. The big users of this will probably be High Performance clusters, where 4 CPU servers (each with 8+ cores) exist. The benefit of This incredibly fast storage will do wonders for these systems.
I’m kinda guessing that CPUs will be the bottleneck for the server crowd, and tthis’ll push CPU development that much further. (Hey, I can hope!)
I really hope developers
I really hope developers won’t stop optimizing their code. Data access can’t ever be fast enough. Wherever you’re running huge databases with tons of users, you’ll be happy for every single timesaving tick.
I think the biggest
I think the biggest bottleneck for the foreseeable future is still network transfer speeds, which also puts a serious onus on programmers to optimize code as far as disk reads/writes, optimizing disk reads/writes to fill out TCP packets as much as possible and not have extraneous information sent over networks is still going to be the key to successful communication with servers. At least until new standards for network communication actually come into play.
Thank you for your effort on
Thank you for your effort on making this review , But I seriously don’t see the point , Did you really think we ( the readers ) can afford such thing ? the item you reviewed is listed at 11,200$ , with this kind of money ill have all the high end pcs for the next minimum 15 years ! Minus this SSD.