1680×1050 – Medium Settings
So, you want to play Battlefield 3 but you don’t have a need for a high end system to do it – you just want to make sure you aren’t left behind. Your monitor might be a bit behind the times with a resolution of 1680×1050 but that doesn’t mean you can’t still snipe some Eyefinity-using-punks avatar from 600m, right? Here is the system we think you need to do it all at medium quality settings.
CPU: Core i5-2500k – $219
MB: ASUS P8Z68-V LE – $129
Memory: 2 x 2GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 – $32
The most expensive part in this system is going to be your processor – the Core i5-2500k and you won’t hurt my feelings at all if you decide to step down to a lower cost Sandy Bridge part here and stick with the same motherboard or even if you decide to go with the AMD platform instead.
For only $169 you can grab the Phenom II X4 980 3.7 GHz processor and easily pick up a 990FX motherboard for the $140 range that will get you running and more than adequate speeds for BF3 and prepare for the pending launch of AMD’s Bulldozer 8-core CPU. As I mentioned on the first page the CPU platform of choice doesn’t really make much a difference in the performance of this game but we like you to be prepared for future titles as well that just MIGHT use the CPU more heavily.
GPU: Zotac AMP! GeForce GTX 560 1GB (overclocked) – $220
My testing has shown that to really reach that 60 FPS mark that is our target for the best gameplay experience, the best card to reach that at Medium quality settings in BF3 is the GTX 560 or the GTX 560 Ti. The reason I selected this Zotac overclocked model is just because of its price and how much it is overclocked from reference speeds: 950 MHz versus 810 MHz! Even though it has fewer shader units than the GTX 560 Ti card I still think for the money this card will get you to your BF3 goals the cheapest.
Oh, and with most of the GeForce cards in this little article, you get a free copy of the upcoming Batman: Arkham City game – a $50 value for what is likely to be a pretty sweet game.
GPU alternate: Gigabyte Radeon HD 6870 1GB (overclocked) – $190
If you want to go the route of the AMD Radeon lineup then the lowest priced card to meet our quality goals for this system would likely be the Radeon HD 6870 card though in my testing it is a bit slower than the GTX 560 series. This overclocked model likely has some more headroom you can push out of the GPU as it is only clocked at 950 MHz (compared to the 900 MHz stock setting).
Base Components Cost: $600
This is definitely a higher cost than our budget system on our Hardware Leaderboard but Battlefield 3 is a tough game on your system, so this is where I think you should be starting at.
i have an i5-2400,8gb 1333mhz
i have an i5-2400,8gb 1333mhz ram,msi twin frozer III gtx 560ti hawk. My screen resolution is 1600X900.
Will i be able to play it in High or ultra settings?
will i be getting a steady 60fps assuming that the final build is more hardware friendly?
TY!
Guys can you please do some
Guys can you please do some proper CPU benchmarks showing scaling with increase of Mhz and increase of cores?
I have a Q9550 @ 4ghz and on caspain 64 player map the CPU sits on 95% and my FPS is sometimes below 30 on High settings, cant even set Ultra.
My GPU’s are 2x GTX275 SLI, which never go above 65%… so I believe the bottleneck is the CPU.
You say the CPU does not matter mcuh, have you really tested properly on caspian map with 64 players?
It makes a HUGE difference compared to Metro, my CPU is only at 65% average in Metro yet 85 to 95% in caspian…..
We need some proper CPU tests! I believe in conquest 64 players the CPU matters a lot more.
Thanks Ryan for this great
Thanks Ryan for this great review.
It really help put thing in perspectives!
I have a computer with an old Radeon GTX 9800 that is still delivering quite good for some games but I’m now on my way to buy a new system and I was thinking about 2 SLI evga GTX590 classified 3gig with the Asus P8Z68 Deluxe motherboard.
What is your opinion about this set-up and can I expect to be “up-to-date” for a few years on the video specs?
Thank you very much for your help and feedback.
François
I went to GeForce Lan 6 this
I went to GeForce Lan 6 this weekend. My latest build I left Nvidia and went with a Sapphire 5870 love the card. But After this lan I think I will purchase 2x 550ti EVGA’s and SLI them for BF3. Any thoughts?
an alternative to the 580gtx
an alternative to the 580gtx would be the 480gtx sc, its only 5% slower with a Overclock. i’ve played ultra in the beta with 50- 75fps
Will you update this article
Will you update this article when the release comes out?
Looking to upgrade graphics
Looking to upgrade graphics for BF3 from an EVGA GTX 260 SCC to a EVGA GTX 560 or 560 Ti. What will I benefit more from in BF3; 2GB of RAM on the card with slightly slower clock/mem speeds or 1GB of RAM on the card with faster clock/mem speeds. Rest of the system is a EVGA P55 mobo, Core i7 860 @ 2.8GHz and 8GB of DDR3 1600 RAM running Windows 7 Pro x64.
Sorry, but this is absolute
Sorry, but this is absolute crap. I can max this game on an AMD 6850 and a Phenom II X4 955 with only 4GBs of DDR3 and still get good frames (40-60). saying you need to spend thousands to hit max is ludicrous, besides, hardly anyone will be playing at 3x 1080p resolutions.
Can I reverse the question?
Can I reverse the question?
What settings in BF3 do you advise for a system with an i5/4GB/HD5850 to reach 60fps for MP?
Would 1680×1050 with high default settings suffice (possibly with turning of some of the AA/MSAA/HBA functions)?
well as this is a tech site,
well as this is a tech site, You should really make an effort to be up to date on things such as GPU scaling. for instance:
“but the fact is that the GeForce cards have been proven to have better multi-GPU scaling.”
No…the fact is that the Nvidia and AMD latest offering (particularly the 6970 and 580’s multi GPU scaling are very close to each other overall. There as always some games that favor one or the other as always. Interestingly enough, BF3 multi GPU scaling is within 1% of each other.
Could I get 60 fps @
Could I get 60 fps @ 1650×1080, bare minimum settings with a GTS 450?
Erm~ Can you do a low
Erm~ Can you do a low quality, full specs with price? pls pls pls pls pls ~T.T~