EVGA Changes the Game Again
EVGA impressed us earlier in the year with the GTX 460 2WIN and the GTX 560 Ti 2WIN promises the same with a custom dual-GPU design.
Dual-GPU graphics cards are becoming an interesting story. While both NVIDIA and AMD have introduced their own reference dual-GPU designs for quite some time, it is the custom build models from board vendors like ASUS and EVGA that really peak our interest because of their unique nature. Earlier this year EVGA released the GTX 460 2Win card that brought the worlds first (and only) graphics card with a pair of the GTX 460 GPUs on-board.
ASUS has released dual-GPU options as well including the ARES dual Radeon HD 5870 last year and the MARS II dual GTX 580 just this past August but they were both prohibitively rare and expensive. The EVGA "2Win" series, which we can call it now that there are two of them, is still expensive but much more in line with the performance per dollar of the rest of the graphics card market. When the company approached us last week about the new GTX 560 Ti 2Win, we jumped at the chance to review it.
The EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2Win 2GB
The new GTX 560 Ti 2Win from EVGA follows directly in the footsteps of the GTX 460 model – we are essentially looking at a pair of GTX 560 Ti GPUs on a single PCB running in SLI multi-GPU mode. Clock speeds, memory capacity, performance – it should all be pretty much the same as if you were running a pair of GTX 560 Ti cards independently.
Just as with the GTX 460 2Win, EVGA is the very first company to offer such a product. NVIDIA didn’t design a reference platform and pass it along to everyone like they did with the GTX 590 – this is all EVGA.
The card length is pretty big coming in at 11.5-in and matches the size of the Radeon HD 6990. The three fan cooling design is both quiet and efficient and I didn’t notice any significant noise during the testing process.
The back of the card shows us the placement of the two GTX 560 Ti GPUs, each housing 384 CUDA cores and able to access 1GB of memory. The core clock speeds are set at 850 MHz, just a bit higher than the 822 MHz reference clock and the memory speeds are still set at 1002 MHz / 4008 MHz effective. Keep in mind that even though the card does have 2GB of memory, each GPU only gets to access half of that.
You might also notice there is an SLI connection on the card – according to EVGA the GTX 560 Ti 2Win still does not support adding in any other GPUs for additional SLI action. Why they continue to leave the connection on the PCB is beyond me – they did the same thing on the GTX 460 2Win.
The display outputs include three dual-link DVI connections and a single mini-HDMI port, all of which can be run at the same time. This card can even run NVIDIA Surround and 3D Vision Surround modes with three displays where most single graphics cards (other than the GTX 590 for example) are limited to two monitors.
The power connections on the card do require a bit more juice than even the GTX 580 – dual 8-pin ATX power is needed. As we’ll see in our power testing, the EVGA GTX 560 Ti 2Win actually is a bit more efficient than a pair of the cards thanks to less redundant hardware to push.
Taking apart the card we find each GPU with its own separate cooler, both of which are modest in weight but still seem to do a great job keeping the GPUs cool with a load temperature of 71C according to GPU-Z.
Hidden under the left most cooler is the same PCI Express 2.0 bridge chip used to split the connection from the motherboard to each GPU on the PCB.
For a quick size comparison we set the new EVGA GTX 560 Ti 2Win next to the GTX 580 reference card. You can clearly see you are going to need a bit more space in your case to fit all 11.5-in.
The reason products like this
The reason products like this arnt common cause it seems they cant make them cheaper then 2 cards. They need to price this 400-500, not over 500…
While I am sure that would
While I am sure that would help them sell more cards, look at where it performs – better than a GTX 580 and close to the level of the GTX 590. I think its pricing is pretty much justifiable from that.
I think the performance is
I think the performance is great for the price point. I personally would be hard pressed to consider this card though. I would rather go with 1 580 and look at going SLI further down the road, when they become cheaper. It is a good solution for those with only one PCIE over the 590, with out a doubt. I just doubt it will be plausible to put in those cases that only have one PCIE with it’s considerable length in mind. If you’re going to go with a 560ti, spend a little more and get this if your case & psu supports it. Overall nice review.
Hmm good idea but has 1 major
Hmm good idea but has 1 major flaw… and its a MAJOR flaw… 1Gb of memory is not enough for SLI systems which usually are for people who run large resolution monitors.
BF3 for example uses over 1GB on High settings and a lot more on ultra with 4x MSAA
The card 1Gb memory per chip,
The card 1Gb memory per chip, giving it 2 Gb memory in total.
It doesn’t work that way
It doesn’t work that way tardo.
Hey now, no need to get mean
Hey now, no need to get mean
SLI and Crossfire both do not
SLI and Crossfire both do not work that way. You do not have 2Gb of total framebuffer space. Each GPU needs to contain the entire contents of the scene since they both render the same thing. Even 4 way SLI with 1Gb cards would result in 1Gb of total vram.
Yeah but with SLI enabled you
Yeah but with SLI enabled you have 1GB in Total.
“This card can even run
“This card can even run NVIDIA Surround and 3D Vision Surround modes with three displays”
So where are the benchmarks with three displays?
Due to the quick launch we
Due to the quick launch we didn’t do any. I can hook it up and run some tests next week if you want.
Too bad you can’t run 2
Too bad you can’t run 2
Agreed. Or at least add in a
Agreed. Or at least add in a third 560 Ti single GPU card.
Great job once again.
Great job once again. It behooves me to understand why other reviewers do not get the importance of minimum frame rate. It is probably the most important metric for me.
On that score, do you think the better smoothness you saw with the 580, despite the lower frame rates, was a result of lower min on the 2Win, or is it related to SLI?
If I had to put my house on
If I had to put my house on it one way or the other, I would bet on SLI.
They should have made this
They should have made this SLI compatible for people with mid-tower cases it’s nice to have 4-way SLI in a compact space.
Interesting comments on BF3.
Interesting comments on BF3. I use a GTX 570 SLI system and it has been butter smooth at 2560×1440 even with 4xMSAA on, though MSAA does slow it down. It’s best to turn this off anyway when using Nvidia cards as FSAA is just as good without a large the performance hit.
Regarding the GTX 560 Ti 2Win, my feeling is that this is likely a combination of a tiny lack of speed but largely the limitation of 1GB onboard memory when 4xMSAA is applied.
I bet it is a folding
I bet it is a folding monster. Nice review 😀
Hey Ryan, did you ever hear
Hey Ryan, did you ever hear back from EVGA or Nvidia regarding the BF3 results?
You might want to try the following to smooth out gameplay…http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,852914/Solved-Battlefield-3-lag-issue-with-DirectX-10-Geforce-cards/Practice/
I read it gives off twice the
I read it gives off twice the heat as a GTX580 So if you have a large case with plenty of out-let fans you may be ok, Id prefer the GTX 590 OR GTX 580 Personally.
the GTX 460 2 Win is much,
the GTX 460 2 Win is much, much cheaper at £300 compared to £419 FOR THIS GTX 560 2 Win. okay the 560 has the edge but for an extra £119… Dunno? what do you guys think?
Can i install N.2 EVGA
Can i install N.2 EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2Win in order to work in SLI (4xSli)?