GPU Testbed – Sandy Bridge-E, X79, New Games

For the Radeon HD 7970 3GB review (and all those going forward) we decided it was high time we replaced the somewhat dated Nehalem-based infrastructure (even though honestly, it was fast enough) with something a bit more current.  Obviously that meant going with the new Intel Sandy Bridge-E processor and X79 motherboard.  By combining support for 40 PCI Express lanes and 3-4 full size GPU slots it makes for the perfect GPU base.

From this point on, our reviews will based around the following system:

  • Intel Core i7-3960X CPU
  • ASUS P9X79 Pro motherboard
  • Corsair DDR3-1600 4 x 4GB Vengeance memory
  • 600GB Western Digital VelociRaptor HDD
  • 1200 watt Corsair Professional Series power supply
  • Windows 7 SP1 x64

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB Graphics Card Review - Kepler in Motion - Graphics Cards  1

The ASUS P9X79 Pro

The Intel Core i7-3960X gives us the fastest consumer-level CPU on the market to help eliminate the possibility of any processor-based bottlenecks in our testing (whenever possible).  There are still going to be some games that could use more speed (Skyrim comes to mind) but for our purposes this is as good as you get without getting into any kind of overclocked settings.  The ASUS P9X79 Pro motherboard has enough space for three dual-slot graphics cards when the time comes for testing 3-Way SLI and CrossFire, and 8 DIMM slots should we want to go up from our current setup of 16GB of Corsair Vengeance memory.  

I chose to stick with the 600GB VelociRaptor hard drive rather than an SSD as our total installation size with Windows 7 SP1 x64 and 6+ games was already hitting the 115GB range.  Finally the 1200 watt power supply from Corsair offers up more than enough juice for three power hungry graphics cards while running quietly enough to not throw off our noise testing drastically.

Speaking of noise, for this article we are re-introducing our sound level testing thanks to the Extech 407738 Sound Level Meter capable of monitor decibel ratings as low as 20db.  This allows me to accurately tell you the noise levels generated by the graphics cards that make in-house at PC Perspective.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB Graphics Card Review - Kepler in Motion - Graphics Cards  2

Along with the new hardware configuration comes a host of new games.  For this review we will be using the following benchmarks and games for performance evaluation:

  • Battlefield 3
  • Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
  • DiRT 3
  • Batman: Arkham City
  • Metro 2033
  • Deus Ex: Human Revolution
  • 3DMark11
  • Unigine Heaven v2.5

This collection of games is both current and takes into account several different genres as well – first person role playing, third person action, racing, first person shooting, etc.  3DMark11 and Unigine Heaven give us a way to see how the cards stack up in a more synthetic environment while the real-world gameplay testing provided by the six games completes the performance picture.

At the time this screenshot was taken, GPU-Z hadn’t been updated to correctly recognize the GTX 680

The comparisons here are dead simple – with a price of $499 the new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB card is going to be going up against the Radeon HD 7970 3GB, the Radeon HD 7950 3GB card and the previous NVIDIA flagship, the GTX 580 1.5GB.  

We used the latest driver versions on the HD 7900 cards (Catalyst 12.2) and for NVIDIA’s new GTX 680 we had a pre-release version of the 300.99 driver.  

The comparisons you should be paying particular attention to:

  • NVIDIA GTX 680 2GB vs HD 7970 3GB – Flagship level cards go head to head.  Does the additional 1GB of memory on the HD 7970 help out in single panel gaming?
  • NVIDIA GTX 680 2GB vs HD 7950 3GB – With a $50 price advantage, can the HD 7950 stay close enough to compete?
  • NVIDIA GTX 680 2GB vs GTX 580 1.5GB – Now with a $409 price, should you get a GTX 580 while still available?

Now, with that out of the way, let’s get on with the results and see how the new Kepler GPU performs!!

« PreviousNext »