PCMark05
For these tests, we use RankDisk, an application developed and copyrighted by Intel. In our testing, we found RankDisk to be suitable for a neutral benchmark. RankDisk is used to record a trace of disk activity during usage of typical applications. These traces can then be replayed to measure the performance of disk operations for that usage.
RankDisk records disk access events using the device drivers and bypasses the file system and the operating system’s cache. This makes the measurement independent of the file system overhead or the current state of the operating system. In replaying traces, RankDisk always creates and operates on a new dummy file. This file is created in the same (or closest possible) physical location of the target hard disk. This allows the replaying of traces to be safe (does not destroy any existing files) and comparable across different systems. Due to the natural fragmentation of hard disks over time, they should be defragmented before running these tests.
The traces used for each test were created from real usage. The traces contain different amount of writing and reading on the disk; total ratio in the HDD test suite disk operations is 53% reads and 47% of writes.
The following input traces are used:
Windows XP Startup: This is the Windows XP start trace, which contains disk activities occurring at operating system start-up. The test is 90% reading and 10% writes. This trace contains no user activity.
Application Loading: This is a trace containing disk activities from loading various applications. It includes opening and closing of the following applications:
Microsoft® Word
Adobe® Acrobat® Reader 5
Windows® Media Player
3DMark®2001SE
Leadtek® Winfast® DVD
Mozilla Internet Browser
The application loading trace is 83% reads and 17% writes.
General Hard Disk Drive Usage: This trace contains disk activities from using several common applications.
These are:
Opening a Microsoft® Word document, performing grammar check, saving and closing
Compression and decompression using Winzip
Encrypting and decrypting a file using PowerCrypt
Scanning files for viruses using F-Secure® Antivirus.
Playing an MP3 file with Winamp
Playing a WAV file with Winamp
Playing a DivX video using DivX codec and Windows® Media Player
Playing a WMV video file using Windows® Media Player
Viewing pictures using Windows® Picture Viewer
Browsing the internet using Microsoft® Internet Explorer
Loading, playing and exiting a game using Ubisoft Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon
The General Usage trace is 60% reads and 40% writes.
Virus Scanning: Virus scanning is a critical task in today’s PC usage. As the major bottleneck of scanning viruses is in hard disk activity, it is reasonable to include virus scanning as a HDD test. The test consists of HDD activity of scanning 600MB of files for viruses. The Virus Scanning test is mostly disk reading (99.5%).
File Write: This trace contains disk activities from writing 680MB files on the hard disk and no read operations are involved in this test.
In the trace based PCMark testing, the 830 Series hang with the other leaders just fine. The spread appears in the File Write test, where capacities dictate performance.
Thanks Al, I was stuck
Thanks Al, I was stuck between this and the 520. I’ll pretty much get which ever one I can for the least amount when I start my build.
Got one of the 256Gb 830’s
Got one of the 256Gb 830’s when they first came out last fall. Compared to the OCZ and Kingston HyperX SSDs I had before, I have not had one issue at all with the Samsung. Fast and reliable.
How does a Crucial M4 hold up
How does a Crucial M4 hold up against one of these Samsung 830? The reason I ask is I have a M4 NIB, should I return it for one of these 830’s?
I would trade it for the 830.
I would trade it for the 830. The M4 is no slouch, but the 830 reviews seem to have been quite positive, all across the board.
Has anyone here upgraded from
Has anyone here upgraded from an older SATA3 Intel or other SSD to one of these at SATA6 and noticed any difference in system responsiveness, boot-up, application load times, etc. Trying to determine if its a worthy upgrade to an older SSD.
The M4 is a disaster.
The M4 is a disaster. Massive, unpublished and unacknowledged issues with driver compatibility (especially the vital Intel RST set) that prevent correct sleeping behavior and will keep your event logs full of red warnings.
I RMA’ed mine (I had a 120GB M4 going into my latest PC) and replaced it with a similarly sized Intel 320. Despite the slower interface, the Intel SSD is noticeably more responsive (probably due to the high I/O performance at low QD, and the excellent random read performance) and certainly less buggy.
Sleep works now!
Interesting, I never heard a
Interesting, I never heard a single complaint about the M4’s, and I’ve sold plenty of them (less so since the 830s were released). To get nit-picky, there isn’t a 120GB version of the M4. I think you mean 128GB.
Great review! I love the
Great review! I love the 830s, and I sell a ton of them. I’d like to see some head to head numbers vs the OCZ Agility and Vertex 3’s. Most customers are interested in the OCZ drives because the price is better and the advertised read/write speeds are sexier. To throw in the M4’s would be great, given that the prices of the Crucial drives are close to Samsung’s prices.
i paid 130 for my m4 128gb.
i paid 130 for my m4 128gb. is the price difference worth it for an 830?
Allyn- can you maybe explain
Allyn- can you maybe explain the IOMeter results a bit more? I’m a little confused how your results show the 830 outperforming the Intel 520 by such a large margin, when other review sites, for example let’s say one that does ‘storage review(s)’, shows a different story- with the 830 actually lagging a bit in IOPS.
Thanks.
-Chris
Allyn- can you maybe explain
Allyn- can you maybe explain the IOMeter results a bit more? I’m a little confused how your results show the 830 outperforming the Intel 520 by such a large margin, when other review sites, for example let’s say one that does ‘storage review(s)’, shows a different story- with the 830 actually lagging a bit in IOPS.
Thanks.
-Chris
Are these normal speeds for
Are these normal speeds for samsung 128gb 830 as a system drive in win7? (seq write @200)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/103221/as-ssd-bench%20SAMSUNG%20SSD%20830%20%202012-03-31%2012-38-09.png
great test, can you give me
great test, can you give me the 64 version please 🙂
The 128Gb is now down to £80
The 128Gb is now down to £80 at a number of outlets – the price of these is now making conventional disks a bit pointless unless less you have major amounts of data.
WHERE IS THE PCPER LOGO
WHERE IS THE PCPER LOGO HERE!!! http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147163 and thanks al i made my ssd decision
WHERE IS THE PCPER LOGO
WHERE IS THE PCPER LOGO HERE!!! http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147163 and thanks al i made my ssd decision