It may seem odd to refer to a $680 monitor as a really great deal but that is exactly what the HP ZR2740w is. Finding a new 27" 2560×1440 IPS display with LED backlighting for under $1000 is well nigh impossible, even finding a used one for around $700 is a rare find. HP has done what no other company has though, cutting costs by removing HDMI and speakers as well as not including an OSD. They did not skimp on the quality of the display however, with a very good response rate for an IPS display as well as a very good colour gamut. AnandTech does warn you that the lack of OSD controls, having a colourometer to calibrate the monitor properly is very important.
"We finally have our first real affordable 27”, high resolution display on the market now, and it comes courtesy of HP. The HP ZR2740w is a 27” IPS panel with 2560×1440 resolution (16:9 aspect ratio) and an LED backlighting system. With a street price that comes in at $700 or below, what has HP done to be able to bring a high resolution display to the masses at a price well below other vendors? Thankfully, they provided me with a unit so I could evaluate it and see."
Here are some more Display articles from around the web:
- Marchon3D EX3D Eyewear Review @MissingRemote
- Steelseries Desmo White Optiks @ XSReviews
- LG 55LM6700 Review @ TechReviewSource
- Startech.com Triple Display Splitter Review @ TechwareLabs
Considering I can get a 27
Considering I can get a 27 inch off eBay for half the price, I’ll pass.
At a 1920 x 1080 resolution?
At a 1920 x 1080 resolution? Gross
Can we get this resolution in
Can we get this resolution in 21″ or lower? Why can I only get a higher resolution by getting a much larger display? The pixel density is worse than many 1080p panels you have been able to get for years.
Well i’m sold on it.
Well i’m sold on it. Definitely a step in the right direction.
seems like a great deal but
seems like a great deal but im not diggin’ the 12ms response time. but im sure this monitor has great color reproduction. the added screen real estate is nice too 🙂
12ms is still lower than one
12ms is still lower than one frame. i’d rather it be slightly lower than what it is though.
I bought this display about 1
I bought this display about 1 and a half months ago, i have been very happy with it for gaming. Once you see such a high res for gaming u cant go back.
If they had this pixel
If they had this pixel density on a 16:10 monitor I would be begging them to take my money. But I’ll pass. I don’t care for 16:9 on monitors (personal preference, not trolling).
Does anyone know of any good 16:10 >24 inch monitors with high pixel density
I would really like PCPer to
I would really like PCPer to do a review on this monitor and let us know how it performs, especially for gaming.