Z87 Chipset Changes, New Socket, Core i7-4770K Sample
As with most new processor releases, Intel has prepared a new chipset to support Haswell and its desktop debut. The flagship part will be the Z87 and every motherboard vendor you can think of has like a dozen of them waiting to sell you.
Realistically, there isn't much that changes with the move from the Z77 to Z87 platform, as you might expect for a processor that isn't changed dramatically from Ivy Bridge to Haswell. You still have 16 lanes of PCI Express 3.0 coming from the processor and the chipset is connected via a DMI 2.0 legacy bus. The chipset now supports six full SATA 6G connections and has six USB 3.0 ports as well.
This table provided by Intel shows off the changes to the Z87 chipset, and it isn't much. No more PCI! That will either be a total mind-melt for you or you won't even notice, either way, it had to happen sooner or later. (Oh, but don't worry, boards can still include third party PCI controllers.)
The Z87 chipset does use a new socket, LGA1150, so don't plan on trying to smash a Haswell processor into your Z77 platform or use an Ivy Bridge part in the new Z87 options. Other than the pin count though the socket works in the exact same fashion.
For our testing we got in a TON of motherboards (of which our very own Morry Teitelman is inundated in) but I decided to use the Intel DZ87KLT-75K for our initial testing. Not only was it just for convenience but it also turned out to be a rock solid and fun motherboard to use – too bad it will be the last from the desktop board team at Intel…
There she is, the 1.4 billion transistor baby that is the Core i7-4770K Haswell processor. Housed in the LGA1150 socket and clamped down, it really looks no different than the Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge parts we have lying around here – which is why a Sharpie is always on hand for identification purposes.
As listed on the previous page, the specifications are very familiar to enthusiasts:
- 3.5 GHz base clock
- 3.9 GHz Max Turbo
- 8MB L3 Cache
- Dual channel DDR3-1333/1600 support
- Intel HD Graphics 4600 – up to 1250 MHz
- Full unlocked multipliers
- $339
Speaking of those multipliers…
In every graph 3570K is named
In every graph 3570K is named i7 instead of i5. Damn you copy paste 🙂
so as expected its a big MEH
so as expected its a big MEH
Micro Center has the I7-4770K
Micro Center has the I7-4770K for $279, $70 cheaper than Newegg.
Even better. They dropped
Even better. They dropped the price on the 3770K by $130 to $229.
WTF Newegg/resellers. Have you really been gouging people this long?
Its been that way for a long
Its been that way for a long time if you have a local MicroCenter to pick one up at, otherwise its still ~$320 at most etailers
They are not making any money
They are not making any money at that price. DUH
WOW !
WOW !
I`m going Haswell when Blue
I`m going Haswell when Blue hits.
Also , I saw in other tech sites that the 4770 is not the top performing Haswell chip that will be released.
There will be others with more GPU horsepower ?
I presently have a C2Q 9550
I presently have a C2Q 9550 12 MB L2 cache…would I get much benefit ?
Stepping up from a C2Q 9550
Stepping up from a C2Q 9550 (same chip I have now) to just an i7 920 would be a huge leap, let alone SB being another sizable jump, with the 5% from both Haswell and IB I think it’s safe to say you will see major performance boost even with a 1Ghz OC on that chip you have now.
I haven’t went out to upgrade myself because I was a believer in the Haswell empty promises that wasted my time, but I work with machines that are SB i5’s and they are smoking smooth, quiet, cool, and fast.
I’ve only heard of a lower
I’ve only heard of a lower TDP 65W model that has the eDRAM onboard (flagship iGPU) that is supposed to be comparable to the i7 4770K, but I really don’t see how that is possible.
Anyways, I wouldn’t call anything with more “GPU” power to be a top performer on the 4770K lineup because to be quite honest, nobody buying those chips is looking for the integrated GPU component. They’d probably sell better if they took that space and replaced it with 2 extra cores. People would have far less to bitch about and you’d see performance gains that would give Intel another 4 years of this 5% performance boost before people start bitching about monopoly.
AMD could name their chip
AMD could name their chip SuperDuperIntelKiller and it still wouldn`t be close.
Cinebench 11.5 .
Cinebench 11.5 . multithread
SB->6.8
Ivy->7.01
Haswell -> 7.68
Here is my conclusion:
NOT WORTH IT.
Ivy should be 2x faster than SB.
Haswell should be 4x times faster than SB and 2x Ivy, not a 10% >< Intel thinks we're all idiots or what? It'a all AMD's fault which does not put enough pressure. Period.
LMAO LMAO LMAO, somebody is
LMAO LMAO LMAO, somebody is seriously underestimating, how hard it is to double chip’s performance every year without adding more execution units.
Looks like my 2600k will live
Looks like my 2600k will live in my system for another few years. “YAY! – MY WALLET
Also a follow up to the first
Also a follow up to the first page there is NO Transactional Synchronization Extensions (TSX) in the Core i7 4770K Processor.
Not to sound like a dick, the
Not to sound like a dick, the first page was just a wast of time I’m not a design engineer now if I had access to the equipment I be more then gladly to study the Architecture.
I do know what your talking about though but for the newbie or first timer they wouldn’t have a clue why because your throwing words with no meaning or diagrams to where it’s coming in or going out and what it’s connected to. Long story short I got bored very fast and just wanted to skip the first page all together but didn’t.
In the future don’t throw up shit like this unless you have some sort of diagram to follow, Tom’s Hardware don’t use this and either does HardOCP keep it simple but yet in lighting the read slowly not slide show screen shot’s from IDF.
Second Page well let’s just say I didn’t pay for a $400 Graphics card to be reading about Intel’s GT2 Architecture and Mobile Crap but then again some people are probable interested in this stuff but I doubt anyone that read this website is.
Thanks for the Overkill Review PCPer.
Evelyn. I agree that
Evelyn. I agree that Raymond`s postlng is flabbergasting, yesterday I got a gorgeous Acura after I been earnin $7654 this-last/4 weeks and just over ten k last munth. without a doubt its my favourite-work Ive ever had. I started this six months/ago and practically straight away began to make over $82, per-hr. I use the details here, Bow6.com
Wow. Sort of cool but barely
Wow. Sort of cool but barely evolutionary and nothing crazy new. So glad I bought a beefy 2600k and a sick GB z68. I knew the rumors around haswell were too good to be true. The bottom line of this review should be- “If you are a PC gamer with a fast GPU and an i7. Ignore Haswell altogether.” Honestly did we hit a wall? Is 5GHZ on 8 cores good enuf for anything? I will wait (probably for a long time) for the CPU that starts to crush my 2600k in gaming FPS. Glad to see my investment still giving me returns despite several new CPU releases.
Truth be told: Sandy Bridge was the big leap in gaming CPUs. Everything since then has been extremely underwhelming and incremental. Great review as always guys.
Yup totally agree with you. I
Yup totally agree with you. I have had my 2600k for almost 2 1/2 years and 3 years come march 2014.
It overclocks like a beast and although I moved away from p67 boards to a z77, It is still rocking without worrying.
Not to sound contradiction but I am going to give my 2600k to my son and keep it in the family. I ordered a 4770k and a z87 board and that will be it until there is a huge jump in microprocessors.
Idle power consumption was
Idle power consumption was higher than the 3770 most likely due to the FIVR.
The marketplace and people
The marketplace and people take care of themselves and others.
I have a new rig. Asus
I have a new rig. Asus maximus vi extreme board and ci7 4770k but it wouldnt give any display via hdmi to me. Please help !! The only way i am able to use my desktop new is that i have temporarily installed a hd7770 and using its hdmi output for display.
Thanks in advance. My retailer told me that since its k processor u need a graphics card for display!!?!
@ryan!could you adjust
@ryan!could you adjust message signal interrupt value to one per core per device in the future(if you aren’t already)specificly for CPU with GPU onboard.driver are limited to one interrupt per socket per device.(ya it is limited!but ms suggest one MSI per physical CPU.since now each core are CPU . I feel it isn’t fair for cpu including GPU to ignore this!why I ignore normal GPU?diminishing return.I feel this have a more dramatic impact on Apr like has well or jaguar then on desktop with GPU like a 7970.Ty Ryan
PS:Drivers can register a single InterruptMessageService routine that handles all possible messages or individual InterruptService routines for each message
Ps2:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff544246(v=vs.85).aspx
I7 920 fanatics: the 920 is a
I7 920 fanatics: the 920 is a great cpu of you are gaming, doing Photoshop and other light stuff. If you are doing 3D, video editing and compositing and other heavy stuff, the 4770 will swipe the floor with your 920, in performance and power consumption.
ASUS Maximus Extreme 2.0X
ASUS Maximus Extreme 2.0X Motherboard(X38 Chipset, 2 Gigabit Ethernet NICS Onboard)need 1 each. Send RFQ.