3DMark
That we have taken a look at our gaming tests using our Frame Rating metrics and testing methods, we are including a set of tests from more standard benchmarks like Unigine Heaven and the new 3DMark benchmark.
I consider these tests to be somewhat of a "best case" for all the cards in our comparison. We aren't using our frame capture system, we aren't measuring frame latency, nothing like that; I think this should give you an idea of graphics performance if each vendor had the best result for each game.
The first thing I noticed with these graphs is the large delta between the R7 265 and the R7 260X. The lower priced card is 22-24% slower in the two 3DMark Fire Strike tests. It is able to match the performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 quite easily. The GTX 650 Ti isn't really in the picture here. The R9 270 shows a 10-11% performance edge of the R7 265 which pretty much matches what we saw in our real world gaming tests as well.
Not bad for the money
Not bad for the money asked
Ryan are you still going to test the eyefinity frame pacing for Tahiti et al that comes with the 14.1 driver? It will be very interesting to see what they did there coz I thought it unfixable.
who even told you that a
who even told you that a gtx660 is a fermi?? anything after gtx650 is a kepler ,these are far away from fermi..
Brain fart!
Brain fart!
From where can we buy this
From where can we buy this beauty?
How does this compare to my
How does this compare to my 560ti?
how would this compare to a
how would this compare to a 7970m?