Coin Mining Performance, Power, Sound and Conclusions

I know it’s a touchy subject, but we did want to see what these cards could actually pull in terms of coin mining / cryptocurrency performance.  Here is our best result, courtesy of the overclocked EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW.

Click to Enlarge

Our result showed performance at about 326 khash/s which is 10-11% faster than the performance of the overclocked reference card we tested last month.  Worth noting is our discovering that in at least this architecture, memory clock speed increases can dramatically increase your hashing rate, so if you can bump that up to 6.0 GHz instead (which we did in our screenshot above) of the 5.4 GHz two of these cards run at on stock, you’ll see a big advantage. 

 

Power consumption was very similar across all three retail cards, in both stock and overclocked settings.  Under a full gaming load, we saw system wide power consumption vary by just 10 watts, from 201 watts to 211 watts depending on the card.  Under overclocked conditions that only moved to 211-216 watts – not a lot of variance to be found.  Based on our performance testing, overclocking testing and now power testing, I find it hard to believe that adding that 6-pin power connector to the GTX 750 Ti (as EVGA and Galaxy did) was really necessary.  Is it hurting anything?  Not really, unless you are a user that wants to use a graphics card without an auxiliary power connection in your system. 

Sound levels were another story though, with a wide range of results.  The quietest card was the one with just a single fan, the PNY GTX 750 Ti XLR8 OC that registered 31 dbA at idle and 31.9 dbA under a full gaming load.  Here’s the break down.

  EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW Galaxy GTX 750 Ti GC PNY GTX 750 Ti OC
Sound Idle 36.6 dbA 32.3 dbA 31.0 dbA
Sound Load 36.8 dbA 33.4 dbA 31.9 dbA

Clearly the EVGA card was the loudest and it was immediately noticeable on our open test bed.  As I mentioned on the first page, because of the fan controller used on the EVGA card there was really no difference in sound levels between idle and load testing – and that was shown in our GPU-Z recording where fan speed never drifted off of 42% during any kind of stock testing.  Only after putting on our overclocked settings did we see the fan speed go higher. 

It’s an odd place to be – the EVGA GTX 750 Ti offered the best cooling with the most stable clock speeds at the highest overclock, but it did so with a dramatically louder configuration that COULD be a lot better with a different controller.  It would appear that cost savings on these mainstream cards bit them just a bit.

Pricing and availability can be a hassle for anyone looking for the PNY or Galaxy cards – they are currently only for sale on each company’s own website.  The EVGA however is widely available on Amazon.com and Newegg.com, starting in the $175 range.  If the other two models can actually be purchased reliably for $159 then they present a value proposition against the EVGA model. (Update: The PNY GTX 750 Ti OC listing did show up on Amazon.com.)

As a group, I was very happy with how the assortment of retail GeForce GT 750 Ti cards turned out and if you’re NVIDIA, you have to be happy with this kind of partner response.  The EVGA GTX 750 Ti ACX FTW is the fastest and most overclockable of the three cards I looked at but has the caveat of unnecessarily high noise levels.  The PNY GTX 750 Ti XLR8 OC is the smallest card and the only one that doesn’t require a 6-pin power connection, just like the reference model.  It has the highest clocks out of the box, but with a less substantial cooler than the EVGA, the clocks are less consistent and when overclocked it and the EVGA card are neck and neck.  The Galaxy GTX 750 Ti is a good middle ground with a solid cooler, quieter design and still has a good amount of headroom for enthusiasts to tweak.  

PNY GeForce GTX 750 Ti XLR8 OC

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ACX FTW

Galaxy GeForce GTX 750 Ti GC

« PreviousNext »