The Hardware and Overclocking
The 2011-v3 socket, that Haswell-E fits into, is very familiar but the physical appearance of the heat spreader has indeed changed.
Core i7-5960X (HSW-E) on left, Core i7-4960X (IVB-E) on right
The updated HSW-E part, on the left, looks much more like the Xeon parts than the mainstream CPU designs at this point, which really just makes the most sense. These are still pin-less processors that have pads on the bottom to make contact with the motherboard pins directly. Other than appearances and some keying to prevent incorrect installation, it is very familiar.
For our testing, Corsair sent over a set of four DDR4 modules, 4GB each for a total of 16GB of system of memory. This kit is rated at 2800 MHz, although I ran it at 2133 MHz during our initial testing and benchmarking to set some baseline performance going forward. There are some quirks with DDR4 memory over 2666 MHz and how XMP works that we'll discuss later, but again, other than pin-count, PCB angling and the ICs on the modules, the technology and installation process remains unchanged.
Our first round of testing was done on ASUS' X99-Deluxe, a full sized ATX motherboard that includes a TON of great features including wireless networking, a header for Thunderbolt expansion, dual Gigabit Ethernet, vertical M.2 SSD support and 3-Way multi-GPU configurations. It has 8 DIMM slots for DDR4 memory and has a maximum capacity of 128GB (once we see 16GB DIMMs hit the street). I love the styling with the white and black colors on the board as well.
EVGA also sent over their Micro ATX X99 motherboard, proving that high performance E-class platforms can exist in the smaller form factor. The board still has support for SLI/CrossFire graphics but limits other expansion options (and only has four DIMM slots) due to the constrained space. I am looking forward to getting this board installed in the Corsair Carbide Air 240 and maybe installing a pair of Radeon R9 295X2 cards to see just how much performance we can squeeze in there!
Morry will have some reviews of X99 motherboards coming up very soon, so be on the lookout for those starting next week!
Overclocking Results with the Core i7-5960X
Before we dive into the stock performance benchmarks with the Core i7-5960X, I know that some of our readers are interested in seeing the overclocking results right up front. If you are familiar with how overclocking on Haswell works, then Haswell-E is going to feel right at home. Because all of the new processors are fully unlocked, you can choose to overclock via multipliers, by base clock or with a combination of the two.
As usual, the ASUS UEFI interface is top notch (as is the Windows-based automatic overclocker) and the overclocking experience went off without a hitch.
Click to Enlarge
Based on input from Intel, ASUS and others, we had a pretty good idea of what the overclocking target was going to be before starting. With a maximum "safe" voltage sitting somewhere around 1.3v, we set that and began to crank up the clock speed on the Core i7-5960X sample we were shipped. To my delight, I was able to boot and run nearly all of my burn-in at 47x on all cores, resulting in a 4.7 GHz clock speed.
We did encounter one crash that pushed me back to the 46x multiplier, but once I set that I never had a stability issue again. I was able to run this processor at 4.6 GHz, on all cores, without issue and without overheating concerns. Do keep in mind that, while I tried to use a single 120mm radiator cooler at first, temperatures were getting into the 90C range – not where I wanted to be. I moved to the Corsair H100i 240mm cooler and temps stayed well under 80C the entire time while overclocked.
4.6 GHz – that is 53% higher than the base clock speed of 3.0 GHz. That is 31% over the top Turbo Boost speed that you would usually only hit with one or two cores active. We achieved it with all 8-cores.
Damn.
CineBench score:
- Stock: 14.29
- OC: 19.46
- 36% Increase
POV-Ray score:
- Stock: 2687
- OC: 3668
- 36% Increase
For comparison, the IVB-E flagship processor (Core i7-4960X) puts out a score of 2006 in POV-Ray, giving the overclocked Core i7-5960X an 82% advantage. Obviously that's comparing a stock CPU to an overclocked HSW-E, but the fact is that if you have been waiting for a platform to upgrade to and your comfortable with a bit of elbow grease and overclocking, X99 and Haswell-E are the best candidates in a long time.
Now, let's see how this 8-core processor handles our suite of benchmarks.
I wonder how much difference
I wonder how much difference Broadwell will make in comparison when it comes out- while it looks like there is a difference in bandwidth, it looks like there was mot much change in performance I could attribute to DDR4. The monster cache was also a ? to me. Perhaps that helps with some DCPs? At any rate, I was hoping for a more definitive toe-to-toe performance change.
If you wouldd like too
If you wouldd like too improve your experience only keep visiting this website and be updated with the newest news posted here.
Also visit my weblog :: Telecharge CoD Advanced Warfare
To guys claiming your apps
To guys claiming your apps need to be multithreaded to use all the cores, what are you running MS DOS???
I have the new 5960x and i
I have the new 5960x and i think people miss the point of the product “THIS IS NOT FOR GAMES”. I am a 3d artist and having to wait too see where you messed up in your renders is KEY, you have no idea how hard it is to make pretty artwork on a i5 or lower chip.
If you want to render footage for youtube or just video/photo editing then dont buy this chip, its a waste plus it shows the world you have no idea what this chip should be used for.
This chip should be used for 3d artist’s who cant buy a super computer but would like fast renders for stills or short animations but saying that i would think for a long animation you would use an online render farm for the fished peace. Yes gpu rendering is great and becoming more mainstream but even these render engines use the cpu with the gpu to make the renders even faster “the cpu will never go away”.
Anyone wanting to judge this cpu against another needs too pick just 3d rendering as the benchmark and nothing else, its intels fault that they dont know how to market there cpu’s (this is a xeon based cpu and people want to play games on it lol)
GROW SOME BALLS INTEL AND MAKE A CPU RANGE FOR 3D ARTISTS THAT IS NOT A £2000/3000 CHIP (WE KNOW YOU CAN DO IT) we dont need to render a whole animated film but too make high-end images fast so we can learn our craft faster is a must…. we make your games and sell your products with our 3d skills, why not have more of us???
Well thats my rant and if you check A1OFFENDER on youtube that would make me happy ohhhhhhhhhhhh and i will say one thing that alot of people dont seem to know, this cpu will give you less frame dips in game but if that is your only need for the cpu and can afford it, do it (so many people say this chip wont help gaming but it will help with the frame dips but is it worth the extra doh???)
Wrote this in a rush lol peace out off to eat dinner
While I don’t see the need
While I don’t see the need for 2 (or 3) HDDs in an HTPC, it is because of noise and extra heat, more so than the loss of space. They had the space, since they wanted to make it the same width/depth dimensions of typical home theatre hardware, so they put it to use.
Arguably, moving the power supply out was extremely wise, since now it can be passively cooled, instead of forcing the chassis fans to go into overdrive venting the excess heat. Looking at the temps of a Pentium, without the addition of a graphics card or power supply, they really didn’t have the headroom to put any other heat producer inside the chassis.
Play GTA Vice City Online
Play GTA San Andreas Online
Telecharger Jeux PC Complet Gratuit
GTA San Andreas Game
harvest moon pc
Jeu Yu Gi Oh PC
Tekken 6 PC
Telecharger Gta San Andreas PC Gratuit
Play Super Mario kart online
قيمزر