Results: Luxmark
I was quite curious about the OpenCL performance of these latest cards. AMD has really been pushing the compute API as of late, especially in advance of their Kaveri APU release. They have a pretty solid OpenCL 1.2 implementation for their GCN based chips. NVIDIA, of course, has been blowing the GPGPU horn as loudly as possible over the years, although they are focused on their CUDA API. Oddly enough, Kepler made compute performance take a back seat to enable better performance and efficiency in graphics applications. I used the 64 bit version of Luxmark 2.0 with the Sala test.
The last several generations of NVIDIA cards have switched their focus from being very balanced in gaming and GPGPU, to being more gaming oriented with adequate GPGPU performance. The 750 Ti comes in last, significantly behind both AMD parts. It is not all that far off from the GTX 760, so at least we can see that there are some GPGPU improvements moving from Kepler to Maxwell.
another 750ti article?
another 750ti article? yawn…….
Josh you are so vain!
Josh you are so vain!
I bet you think this article
I bet you think this article is about you.
Have some class, you
Have some class, you represent PCper.
and he is doing it perfectly
and he is doing it perfectly
This is more exciting. Crysis
This is more exciting. Crysis running on a 750ti at high settings at consistent 30fps. You really got to watch the video to believe it
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-case-for-30fps-pc-gaming
so now quiet, tiny and
so now quiet, tiny and effective is a synonymous for slow and expensive ?
Pretty sure I did discuss how
Pretty sure I did discuss how it was a more expensive proposition as compared to the faster R9 270 and 270X. Or how a R9 280 is only about $20 more when on special. It isn't a slow card, it is just expensive as compared to other competing products in that very compressed space.
MMMM all this people
MMMM all this people criticizing to this guy who wrote this article , but what i found funny about them is that all they are ANONYMOUS , those people are so coward that they don´t even want to let their names to defend what they are talking about o.O , great article BTW, i have this graphic card pretty amazing card and LOW energy consumption , here in Latin America in countries like Basil or Mexico to have a high energy consumption or Not, is the difference between to pay 50 dollars every two months or to have to pay 140 dollars for the same couple of months. Great product for a greener planet for any region. USA produce 25 % or more of the pollution on this planet ,and they are only about 4 % of the population on earth, you have to care for this kind of products beyond the performance or the price. Our planet will appreciate that!
“it is still a potential
“it is still a potential bottleneck for certain gaming scenarios”
If you’re going to point this out more than once perhaps do a little research so you can report how MUCH this would be in a worst-case scenario.
I can tell you. It only happens in some very high resolution scenarios like 4K, probably NEVER happen to most people, and when it does it’s a very minor thing.
They tested this extensively when the 970/980 cards came out and the results can easily be applied to the GTX750Ti since the processing vs memory bandwidth is proportional.
Hi guys.
This is my first
Hi guys.
This is my first time comenting. Great review, I own a EVGA GTX 750 ti SC and it runs great at 1080p High Settings. I’m getting 60+ FPS on most of my games. I saw a Gigabyte 750 ti advertising 4k support with 2 HDMI, how is this possible? Anyway Thanks for the Review.