Power, Temperature, and Overclocking
Power
We finally come to the area where this particular board excels. Maxwell was built from the ground up to be the most efficient architecture on the market in terms of power to performance. When we take into consideration the performance of this card and its sub 75 watt TDP, it is keeping up with the competition while running on about half the power. This most certainly is not a power user card, but it is extremely cool running and power efficient.
Idle draw is pretty similar for all of the boards. Both AMD and NVIDIA have done very well in getting idle power down to extremely low levels for most desktop usage.
When we crank things up a bit, the landscape changes dramatically. The STRIX card is by far the lowest power part of the group, and is an impressive 70 watts lower than the competing R9 270X. It is also a full 100 watts less than the GTX 760 that is based on the Kepler architecture, which is the most suprising aspect to me.
Temperature
The STRIX design is aimed at providing a good cooling solution that makes very little sound. Fan noise is not an issue with this card, even when overclocked and running in a warm room. The lowest possible temperatures are not the aim here. While Asus wants to keep the design under 90C at all times, it is not going for the lowest absolute temperatures with this card.
40C at idle is not bad, especially considering that the fans are not actually moving and it stays at this temperature. At load we see the STRIX card go up to 59C, which again is not bad at all considering that the fans are really just barely moving.
Overclocking
This particular exercise with the latest NVIDIA cards can be a little frustrating due to the card to card variance we see in base clocks. The STRIX GTX 750 Ti is specified for an 1124 MHz base with a 1202 MHz boost speed. In reality I saw boost hit 1267 MHz consistently. I used the Asus GPU Tweak utility to further overclock this card.
Without pushing the voltage up, I was able to get the card to 1402 MHz. That was as far as the utility would allow me to overclock. This is a pretty hefty OC for no change in voltage, but it does not really result in a big boost in performance. Users will get a handful of extra fps by overclocking to this level. What surprised me most is that the fan still never became audible even when overclocked.
The memory’s stock speed is 5400 MHz effective. I took the memory slider as far over as it could go and it was able to run without an issue at 5600 MHz. This is obviously not a very big overclock and it results in a couple extra GB/sec of bandwidth. The chip is not exactly bandwidth starved due to the inclusion of a much larger L2 cache than the previous Kepler generation had, but memory access is still a hurdle for the card to render above 1080P and be playable.
I tested the overclock with a couple of runs of the Valley benchmark. It did not crash or show any corruption. I did see the average frame rate go up from 45.2 to 48.4 fps at 1920 x 1200. This is less than 10% of an increase in actual performance. Free performance is nice, but the GTX 750 Ti does not gain all that much when it is overclocked.
another 750ti article?
another 750ti article? yawn…….
Josh you are so vain!
Josh you are so vain!
I bet you think this article
I bet you think this article is about you.
Have some class, you
Have some class, you represent PCper.
and he is doing it perfectly
and he is doing it perfectly
This is more exciting. Crysis
This is more exciting. Crysis running on a 750ti at high settings at consistent 30fps. You really got to watch the video to believe it
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-case-for-30fps-pc-gaming
so now quiet, tiny and
so now quiet, tiny and effective is a synonymous for slow and expensive ?
Pretty sure I did discuss how
Pretty sure I did discuss how it was a more expensive proposition as compared to the faster R9 270 and 270X. Or how a R9 280 is only about $20 more when on special. It isn't a slow card, it is just expensive as compared to other competing products in that very compressed space.
MMMM all this people
MMMM all this people criticizing to this guy who wrote this article , but what i found funny about them is that all they are ANONYMOUS , those people are so coward that they don´t even want to let their names to defend what they are talking about o.O , great article BTW, i have this graphic card pretty amazing card and LOW energy consumption , here in Latin America in countries like Basil or Mexico to have a high energy consumption or Not, is the difference between to pay 50 dollars every two months or to have to pay 140 dollars for the same couple of months. Great product for a greener planet for any region. USA produce 25 % or more of the pollution on this planet ,and they are only about 4 % of the population on earth, you have to care for this kind of products beyond the performance or the price. Our planet will appreciate that!
“it is still a potential
“it is still a potential bottleneck for certain gaming scenarios”
If you’re going to point this out more than once perhaps do a little research so you can report how MUCH this would be in a worst-case scenario.
I can tell you. It only happens in some very high resolution scenarios like 4K, probably NEVER happen to most people, and when it does it’s a very minor thing.
They tested this extensively when the 970/980 cards came out and the results can easily be applied to the GTX750Ti since the processing vs memory bandwidth is proportional.
Hi guys.
This is my first
Hi guys.
This is my first time comenting. Great review, I own a EVGA GTX 750 ti SC and it runs great at 1080p High Settings. I’m getting 60+ FPS on most of my games. I saw a Gigabyte 750 ti advertising 4k support with 2 HDMI, how is this possible? Anyway Thanks for the Review.