Setup and Errata
I am comparing this card to the MSI GTX 760, Asus R9 280X, and the MSI R9 270X. All of these cards are more expensive than the GTX 750 Ti, but not by a whole lot. This area is very tightly constrained when it comes to money. An extra $20 can provide a very significant boost in overall performance at higher resolutions.
A decent look at the heatsink. Two heatpipes are more than adequate for this particular GPU.
The Asus STRIX GTX 750 Ti worked exactly as expected. It provided no issues and I experienced no complications with installation and the running of benchmarks. Testing was also comprised of some regular multi-hour gaming scenarios.
The NVIDIA 347.09 WHQL drivers were used for the NVIDIA cards, while the AMD cards had been previously tested with the Catalyst 14.7 RC1 drivers.
The back is pretty bare, but not uncommon for a budget graphics card. It is not nearly heavy enough to require a backplate.
System Specifications
Intel i7 3770K
Gigabyte G1.Sniper3
2 x 4 GB GSkill DDR-3 1866 Memory
Western Digital 1 TB Caviar Black HD
Lite-On BDR
Corsair 1200AXP Power Supply
Enermax Fulmo GT Case
Windows 8.1 64 Bit
another 750ti article?
another 750ti article? yawn…….
Josh you are so vain!
Josh you are so vain!
I bet you think this article
I bet you think this article is about you.
Have some class, you
Have some class, you represent PCper.
and he is doing it perfectly
and he is doing it perfectly
This is more exciting. Crysis
This is more exciting. Crysis running on a 750ti at high settings at consistent 30fps. You really got to watch the video to believe it
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-case-for-30fps-pc-gaming
so now quiet, tiny and
so now quiet, tiny and effective is a synonymous for slow and expensive ?
Pretty sure I did discuss how
Pretty sure I did discuss how it was a more expensive proposition as compared to the faster R9 270 and 270X. Or how a R9 280 is only about $20 more when on special. It isn't a slow card, it is just expensive as compared to other competing products in that very compressed space.
MMMM all this people
MMMM all this people criticizing to this guy who wrote this article , but what i found funny about them is that all they are ANONYMOUS , those people are so coward that they don´t even want to let their names to defend what they are talking about o.O , great article BTW, i have this graphic card pretty amazing card and LOW energy consumption , here in Latin America in countries like Basil or Mexico to have a high energy consumption or Not, is the difference between to pay 50 dollars every two months or to have to pay 140 dollars for the same couple of months. Great product for a greener planet for any region. USA produce 25 % or more of the pollution on this planet ,and they are only about 4 % of the population on earth, you have to care for this kind of products beyond the performance or the price. Our planet will appreciate that!
“it is still a potential
“it is still a potential bottleneck for certain gaming scenarios”
If you’re going to point this out more than once perhaps do a little research so you can report how MUCH this would be in a worst-case scenario.
I can tell you. It only happens in some very high resolution scenarios like 4K, probably NEVER happen to most people, and when it does it’s a very minor thing.
They tested this extensively when the 970/980 cards came out and the results can easily be applied to the GTX750Ti since the processing vs memory bandwidth is proportional.
Hi guys.
This is my first
Hi guys.
This is my first time comenting. Great review, I own a EVGA GTX 750 ti SC and it runs great at 1080p High Settings. I’m getting 60+ FPS on most of my games. I saw a Gigabyte 750 ti advertising 4k support with 2 HDMI, how is this possible? Anyway Thanks for the Review.