Inside the NUC
Getting inside and working on the Broadwell Intel NUC is essentially unchanged from the previous models.
The bottom of the NUC has four screws that double as rubber feet and you'll likely be able to just use your hands to unscrew the four corners. This is a slick little design touch – rubber feet that don't cover the screws and instead are a functional part of the base. After pulling up on the four screws (though they won't release completely) you'll have to wiggle the base plate out a bit as the fit is tight and you can't move one side up very far without having to do the same for the opposite.
Looking at the inside of a NUC is a lesson in design and frugality – there is no space that is not utilized and there are no unnecessary components that don't add to performance or connectivity. It is amazing to consider how much compute and how many features they can cram onto a 4" square PCB.
There are only two components that you have to install after picking up a NUC5i5RYK barebones kit. System memory comes in the form of SODIMM slots and requires LPDDR3 and can run as high as 1600 MHz. The lower power DDR3 derivative is a Broadwell requirement and helps limited power consumption under both load and idle workloads. Intel supplied us with a pair of 4GB SODIMMs from Kingston's HyperX Impact brand that you can pick up for $60-80 depending on the day and current specials in place. Just like a notebook PC, the SODIMM modules install easily and stack on top of one another.
The only remaining component to install is your storage in form of an M.2 SSD of some kind. Intel supports both SATA and PCI Express based M.2 drives so you will have a fairly large selection of options before you. In our review kit Intel actually included two different drive options for us to test, Intel's own 530 Series SSD running through SATA and the Samsung XP941 SSD that uses PCI Express.
Obviously the Samsung drive is going to be considerably faster but it will also cost you quite a bit more – for now. Amazon.com lists the 512GB version of the XP941 at $509 but you can get a similar capacity M.2 SATA SSDs for half of that.
Installation of either is dead simple and only requires a single screw.
There is a full size SATA connection on the motherboard as well as one located between the SODIMM and M.2 slots, though in this iteration of the NUC it cannot be used. There is another kit, the NUC5i5RYH, that supports a 2.5-in hard drive or SSD in addition to the M.2 slot.
With a little more effort, simply for science sake, you can remove the motherboard inside the NUC chassis. The heatsink and turbine-style cooler are actually located along the top of the device. In our testing the fan is effective but very quiet – sitting on the desk next to us did not result in a noise concern at all and the system was barely audible nearly 100% of the time.
Under that heatsink rests the Intel Core i5-5250U Broadwell processor built on Intel's latest 14nm process technology. On the same package is the PCH, or chipset, that includes logic for the SATA interface, USB 3.0, etc.
If you read any of our previous stories on the Intel NUC platform you will remember that you had to purchase and install three specific components: memory, storage and wireless. With the Broadwell generation Intel has instead built the wireless controller directly onto the motherboard, another benefit of shrinking down the size of the processor package and power circuitry. The Intel 7265D2W is a dual-band 802.11ac 2×2 Wi-Fi adapter that also includes Bluetooth support. With wireless speed rated as high as 867 Mbps, this should be more than enough for most users to forgo the need for wired Ethernet.
As I mentioned on the previous page, one of the features that Intel is trying to promote is the idea of the replaceable cover. This allows end users or OEMs to customize the device with something as simple as a different color paint job or as complex as a pico projector or NFC reader. Intel's NUC landing page even has a section on the lid that includes files for you to use and customize to your liking, should you have access to a 3D printer. Intel does claim there are other partners with different lids in the works but we don't yet have anything in our hands to test out or demonstrate with.













Crucial has a M.2 series of
Crucial has a M.2 series of ssds. Do you plan to get those? also its quite a bit cheaper compared to Samsung’s XP series ssd.
Old benchmarks (Sandra 2013,
Old benchmarks (Sandra 2013, Cinebench R11.5)
no recent AMD hardware (A10-7600 45W?)
no video playback tests
no gaming tests
Is this a review or a product placement?
I agree, video benchmarks
I agree, video benchmarks would be nice since I think, outside the office, the real draw for these is an HTPC.
can it stream hulu/netflix/amazon without a hitch, can it stream hd/uhd from a NAS/workstation
hell can it even display UHD?
stuff like this would be nice.
Yes, I actually came here for
Yes, I actually came here for this, but OK.
We played back 4K YouTube
We played back 4K YouTube video and it played without issue. Using Flash, that is likely the biggest stress you'll have on it.
I'll hook it back up and try some other sources if you would like anything specific!
I would really like to know
I would really like to know if it can handle streaming some high bitrate video, wired/wireless, with something like plex or xbmc. Does it support advanced audio outputs like dolby HD or ATMOS, DTS, etc. perhaps that headphone jack is also an optical port? if not, will it at least pass the the correct audio over hdmi?
I want to make sure if I drop $600 on one of these little buggers, it’s going to streaming all my content and output my audio correctly.
I think another good test would be steam’s in home streaming, I don’t think it’ll have a problem with that, but a useful test for sure.
hmm I think that’s all the questions I have off the top of my head.
More benchmarks pls
More benchmarks pls
This is a good review- I
This is a good review- I always like to look at Ice Storm Unlimited as a test though – it can be compared across platforms including phones.
The move toward tablets and small form factor “PC”s feels like PC builders are being left out in the cold. There’s no move to standardize or component-ize smaller parts, so we’re left with these monster size PCs (compare this to an ITX even!).
The problem is that there’s no motivation on Intel’s side to let anyone compete here. Want a better NIC, a ‘laptop’ GPU, the option to update your CPU, a better sound solution, or just in general different features on your motherboard? Too bad.
Think about it this way – if any one of those components go bad, you have to throw away the whole thing, or attempt a repair on something that’s been wave soldered (good luck).
Consumers need to form a standards group or something – it’s going to get ridiculous until there are virtually no choices left.
One thing that will help
One thing that will help advance the whole NUC idea (form factor, speed etc) is usb 3.1.
Intel will not support usb 3.1 until when, 2016? So next year, maybe, we will see new possibilities in SFF based on Intel chips and chipsets.
It would help for external
It would help for external connectivity support, no doubt. I did really like the Thunderbolt option on the first NUC.
Hmmmmm, that M.2 port
Hmmmmm, that M.2 port directly over the wifi card. I don’t know about you guys, but the first thing that comes to my mind is interference, and severe one!!!
Amazon is showing the XP941
Amazon is showing the XP941 for a price of about $510
$0.29 per GB would be nice, but not yet
Samsung XP941 512GB M.2 80mm PCIe x4 SSD – MZHPU512HCGL http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JOSM3TK/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_awdl_ar36ub11KNENH
OR for $260.00 you can get a
OR for $260.00 you can get a complete pc with windows 8.1.
perfect for htpc with a nas
http://www.amazon.com/Zotac-ZBOX-CI320NANO-U-W2-nano-Plus-Windows/dp/B00M4OEPLA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1424734030&sr=8-2&keywords=ci320
http://www.technikaffe.de/cpu
http://www.technikaffe.de/cpu_vergleich-intel_celeron_n2930-398-vs-intel_core_i5_5250u-469
Bro, lets be serious. That PC you linked was around 25-35% of the performance this NUC offers. Not even in the same ball park.
Don’t bring that weak Celeron stuff around here.
Might finally pull the
Might finally pull the trigger on one of these. Will the mini HDMI or Display Port run a Dell u3011 @ 2560×1600? I only ask because I could never get that resolution to work on an i7-3570k’s integrated GPU.
Can this mini pc run modern
Can this mini pc run modern titles like far cry 4 nfs mw or cod advanced warfare above 25 or 30fps if we lower the graphics quality to medium or low?
Does the 3.5mm audio jack
Does the 3.5mm audio jack support digital audio stream so that a 3.5 mm to TOSLINK (spdif) may be connected so it can be plugged into stereo preamp for decoding dolby digital?
does it support 1,5v ram
does it support 1,5v ram cards? instead of the 1,35v ram cards.