Introduction, Specifications and Packaging
The long awaited and often rumored Intel SSD 750 Series is finally here, bring NVMe technology and speeds over 2GB/s for enthusiasts!
Editor's note: We are hosting a live stream event with our friends at Intel's SSD group today to discuss the new SSD 750 Series launch and to giveaway a couple of the 400GB units as well! Be sure you stop by to ask quesitons, learn about the technology and have a chance to win some hardware!!
Introduction:
Intel has a habit of overlapping their enterprise and consumer product lines. Their initial X25-M was marketed to both consumer and enterprise, with heavier workloads reserved for the X25-E. Their SSD 320 Series was also spec'd for both consumer and enterprise usage. Their most recent SSD 730 Series was actually an overclocked version of their SSD DC S3500 units. Clearly this is an established trend for Intel, so when they dominated flash memory performance with the SSD DC P3700 launch last year, pretty much everyone following these sorts of things eagerly waited in anticipation of a consumer release.
While they were hard to find outside of enterprise supply chains, some dedicated users picked up that enterprise part for their enthusiast systems, but many were disappointed as the P3700's enterprise hardware and firmware conflicted with many consumer motherboards' BIOS, rendering it unbootable for some and causing address space conflicts for others. In short, the P3700 was a great product that simply did not function properly with most consumer motherboards. All anyone could do was wait for Intel to spin a consumer product from this enterprise part, and that day is today:
This is the add-in card version of the new Intel SSD 750 Series that brings NVMe technology and insane performance levels to consumers at a cost that is more affordable than you might think.
As with the enterprise variant, Intel chose to launch the SSD 750 Series in the familiar HHHL PCIe x4 form factor as well as a 2.5" SFF-8639 packaging. The 2.5" model contains the exact same set of components, just rearranged into a smaller device.
Despite being 2.5", this is not a SATA device. While the connector may look similar, it is *very* different:
As you can see above, SFF-8639 further extends on the familiar SATA power and data connections, which had already been extended a few times to add additional SAS data lines. The new spec adds a complete row of pins on the back side of the connector to support four lanes of PCIe. This means the SFF variant of the SSD 750 will perform identically to the PCIe half-height card version. Since SFF-8639 was born as an enterprise spec, one question remains – how do you connect it to a consumer desktop motherboard? Well, desktop motherboards are coming with M.2 ports that can support up to PCIe 3.0 x4, so all you really need is a simple way to get from point A to point B:
Pictured above (left) is the ASUS 'Hyper Kit' adapter PCB, which was sampled to us with their new Sabertooth X99 motherboard just for testing these new 2.5" devices. The connector you see at the right may look familiar, as it is an internal Mini-SAS HD (SFF-8643) cable commonly used with high end SAS RAID cards. Intel is basically borrowing the physical spec, but rewiring those four SAS lanes over to the PCIe pins of the SFF-8639 connector at the other end of the cable.
You may be asking 'Why bother?'. Well, enthusiasts like multiple GPU configurations, and workstation systems may have their PCIe slots loaded with other devices. Since many new systems come with a capable M.2 slot, the 2.5" model could be installed on the usual mounting bracket inside a case and simply wired to the motherboard using this special cable.
It is also possible to connect the 2.5" model directly to a standard PCIe slot, but a special (and currently rare) adapter is required. Here is one provided to us by SerialCables.com:
The PCI-AD-x439-01 provided to us by SerialCables.com is a pricy option as this is a very new adapter type, but we suspect prices will come down with simpler adapter designs in the future. While writing this we spotted a lower cost PCI-AD-x439-01HF edition that also includes a cooling fan.
Specifications:
Yeah, you read that right. 440,000 IOPS. The only disappointment in the specs is the lack of an 800GB model. That seems to be a good sweet spot capacity for enthusiasts, with 400GB being too small for some and 1.2TB of flash potentially to expensive for others.
Packaging:
We received early samples of these products, and consumer packaging is not yet available. We will add a photo of their consumer packaging once we have one on hand.










A quick note on the samples
A quick note on the samples we included in this testing:
I just bought the latest ASUS
I just bought the latest ASUS Z10PE10-D8 WS MOBO. Can you tell me for the 2.5 form factor will I need that adapter SFF? Plus does ASUS need to update the bios for this board to be able to boot from a NVMe SSD?
why didn’t intel use NVMe
why didn’t intel use NVMe over sata express? the use of the sff seems like an odd choice, compared to the more compatible and consumer friendly sata express.
SATA Express is limited to
SATA Express is limited to PCIe x2 (typically 2.0). This SSD easily saturates that link.
SATA express just seems to be
SATA express just seems to be DOA. It is a large connector and just seems like a kludge. I don’t like using this weird m.2 adaptor. They reall should just create an official standard for PCI express cable connections if one doesn’t already exist.
what is up with this horrid
what is up with this horrid boot time….worst out of 14 other drives. Plextor M6 is 15 seconds, this 1200 dollar 750 is 34 seconds…whats up, see review here.
http://techreport.com/review/28050/intel-750-series-solid-state-drive-re…
That’s a BIOS issue.
That's a BIOS issue.
http://rog.asus.com/418662015
http://rog.asus.com/418662015/labels/product-news/asus-announces-all-x99-and-z97-motherboards-support-nvm-express-devices/
I looked at Asus’ ROG blog and it seems to have some unclear information.
I was hoping you could clear it up for me
It then goes on to say that only X99 supports hyperkit.
All the Z97 boards are listed as N/A for compatibility…does that mean that the bios will be updated to allow compatibility with the hyperkit, but that they aren’t currently compatible?
Or does it mean that all their boards are compatible with NVMe m.2 SSDs, but hyperkit will only be supported by X99?
My question is regarding that
My question is regarding that non-pcie ssd, why didnt Intel choose a 3.5″ form factor for that drive it would have allowed for better thermals and most of the enterprise / enthusiast cases have 3.5″ mounting options by default. other than that in future I hope all ssds drop that ahci protocol for the faster nvme or some other protocol.
Most cases also have 2.5″
Most cases also have 2.5" mount points. Intel already had their enterprise variant in the standard 2.5" SFF-8639 form factor (used to fit more units into a smaller rack mount chassis). Also, the thermals are handled well enough with the smaller form factor, so no need for them to engineer a larger one.
How does it work with 86
How does it work with 86 dies? Isn’t it supposed to be multiple of 18 since it’s an 18 channel controller?
Intel’s controller does not
Intel's controller does not require fixed die count per channel. They can stagger them however they please.
Any comparison of CPU usage
Any comparison of CPU usage vs sata/other implementations?
This is very tricky to
This is very tricky to measure accurately as the IOPS figures are vastly different between the two types for any given test. Data I've seen in NVMe presentations suggests the CPU overhead is reduced to ~35% of an equivalent AHCI device for each IO.
Well its insanely fast but
Well its insanely fast but does it really matter?
Do you “feel” any difference between a maxed out SATA and a 4xPCIe NVMe SSD?
It really depends on what you
It really depends on what you are doing with it, but the fact that latency is at least half of any given SATA IO, that largely adds to the 'feel' of the device. As a point of comparison, this is much closer to the feel of a RAM drive.
This is easily explained this
This is easily explained this way:
The slowest part in your computer is your HDD/SSD currently. If you increase that speed you increase the entire computer speed.
You well not see benefit if SSD getting faster if that SSD has the speed of your RAM.
That’s awesome. Does a
That’s awesome. Does a consumer/enthusiast really need this sort of speed, though? A colleague’s immediate reaction was “I want one of these for my ESXi server,” and I have to agree on that score. Still feels like something best suited for specialist applications. Especially with that connector on the 2.5″ model.
I would agree if the cost/GB
I would agree if the cost/GB was higher. For anyone wanting PCIe-level SSD performance, this comes in at roughly half the cost of any competing solution that comes anywhere close on sequentials, and it wipes the floor with them in random IO and extremely low latency. This would be a good equivalent for those who have previously been comfortable with an SSD 4-drive RAID-0 (but this is still faster).
The general consumer is
The general consumer is likely going to wait until these are within whistling distance of an 850 EVO (.35-.40 $/GB). The general consumer- even many prosumers- are not going to care unless they have enterprise level operations.
Still, it’s pretty impressive if you are spending for ego purposes.
How hot do these get?
How hot do these get? Especially the 2.5″ one? Does it need a fan blowing past it, or could you stick it in a corner of your case without any direct airflow without issue?
The 1.2GB model can peak at
The 1.2GB model can peak at 22W during continuous heavy writes, so you would certainly not want it sitting in a 'dead spot' of your case if you intend to load it to that degree. For easier / intermittent use, it would probably be ok with indirect ventilation.
‘O geezz I wonder how many of
‘O geezz I wonder how many of these dang new fangal social services will Ryan make me join in order to Enter this competition[Like Twitter… Yes Ryan Some Don’t have FB’s and TWIT’sey accounts. or forgot the password ;(] will Ryan make me join in order to Enter this competition..Anyway looking forward to this.. I’ll start diggin up that twatter pword:.
1. When will these be
1. When will these be available for purchase (not pre order)?
2. Why did they use a green pcb instead of a better looking black one?
yeah i miss the skulltrail
yeah i miss the skulltrail logo as well a black pcb. didnt the 730 series have one at least?
I’d buy this for a dollar :
I’d buy this for a dollar : )
*hnnnggh* Oh man, like i
*hnnnggh* Oh man, like i needed another reason to upgrade from my aging z68 and sandy bridge setup.
Looking at some other reviews
Looking at some other reviews I see that although this is a fast drive it doesn’t seem to improve game load times whatsoever. What’s the bottleneck now that drives aren’t the slowest link. The CPU? If the CPU can push benchmarks that much faster shouldn’t it be loading games that much faster as well?
nowadays games are made with
nowadays games are made with consoles in mind so you have fixed hardware to reach your frametimes. beside some fancy pc centric MMO’s i dont know any software to need better streaming performance storage-wise.
Those drives are sweet
Those drives are sweet
Does the new controller also
Does the new controller also have the the hard write limit e.g., bricking/ read only mode after a specific amount of writes?
None that we are aware of.
None that we are aware of. These should not go into read-only mode unless they exhaust all spare cells. The P3700 series would brick in that condition, but that is because Intel enterprise firmwares are designed to fail on any significant fault (so they can be easily identified and replaced). The 750 has a more consumer friendly firmware.
Nice review, really like what
Nice review, really like what I’m hearing in regards to performance. BTW, just checked Amazon to see the pre-order prices sitting over $1/GB at $488 and $1230 respectively without shipping included.
Should we be expecting updates (firmware or new iterations) that will allow systems take advantage of of the drives full potential (ex. multi-threading, raid)?
These already multithread
These already multithread extremely well (it was the fault of our test methods pegging before the 750). RAID boot support is extremely unlikely on the current generation of systems.
SSDs don’t need to get
SSDs don’t need to get faster, they need to get cheaper. $0.86/GB is pathetic.
Faster $0.86/GB SSDs drive
Faster $0.86/GB SSDs drive down the cost of lower performing SSDs even further.
lets hope that the interface
lets hope that the interface change doesn’t complicate the usual pricing trends.
They do need to get faster.
They do need to get faster. HDD/SSD is the slowest part in any PC. Increase that speed and you increase the entire PC speed.
Where’s that ARM douche in
Where’s that ARM douche in these comments?
Sounds like single threaded
Sounds like single threaded software might be the upcoming bottleneck in PC’s if the SSD market keeps growing?
So Allyn, NVME drives have a
So Allyn, NVME drives have a single controller correct? That should make them more reliable than stuff like the Phoenix blade.
Isn’t the Phoenix blade essentially four SSDs in RAID0? Wouldn’t that be a much more volatile solution than the 750?
Not to mention that the blade is using ISCSI that’s limited to 32 queues which is where random performance and actual real world usage comes in.
Yes, those competing units
Yes, those competing units have more points of failure. Since the Blade is handing off IOs to multiple controllers, it can actrually scale to QD>32, but it still has its limits, and is significantly more latent per IO.
Good info, thanks.
Good info, thanks.