Introduction, Specifications and Packaging
The long awaited and often rumored Intel SSD 750 Series is finally here, bring NVMe technology and speeds over 2GB/s for enthusiasts!
Editor's note: We are hosting a live stream event with our friends at Intel's SSD group today to discuss the new SSD 750 Series launch and to giveaway a couple of the 400GB units as well! Be sure you stop by to ask quesitons, learn about the technology and have a chance to win some hardware!!
Introduction:
Intel has a habit of overlapping their enterprise and consumer product lines. Their initial X25-M was marketed to both consumer and enterprise, with heavier workloads reserved for the X25-E. Their SSD 320 Series was also spec'd for both consumer and enterprise usage. Their most recent SSD 730 Series was actually an overclocked version of their SSD DC S3500 units. Clearly this is an established trend for Intel, so when they dominated flash memory performance with the SSD DC P3700 launch last year, pretty much everyone following these sorts of things eagerly waited in anticipation of a consumer release.
While they were hard to find outside of enterprise supply chains, some dedicated users picked up that enterprise part for their enthusiast systems, but many were disappointed as the P3700's enterprise hardware and firmware conflicted with many consumer motherboards' BIOS, rendering it unbootable for some and causing address space conflicts for others. In short, the P3700 was a great product that simply did not function properly with most consumer motherboards. All anyone could do was wait for Intel to spin a consumer product from this enterprise part, and that day is today:
This is the add-in card version of the new Intel SSD 750 Series that brings NVMe technology and insane performance levels to consumers at a cost that is more affordable than you might think.
As with the enterprise variant, Intel chose to launch the SSD 750 Series in the familiar HHHL PCIe x4 form factor as well as a 2.5" SFF-8639 packaging. The 2.5" model contains the exact same set of components, just rearranged into a smaller device.
Despite being 2.5", this is not a SATA device. While the connector may look similar, it is *very* different:
As you can see above, SFF-8639 further extends on the familiar SATA power and data connections, which had already been extended a few times to add additional SAS data lines. The new spec adds a complete row of pins on the back side of the connector to support four lanes of PCIe. This means the SFF variant of the SSD 750 will perform identically to the PCIe half-height card version. Since SFF-8639 was born as an enterprise spec, one question remains – how do you connect it to a consumer desktop motherboard? Well, desktop motherboards are coming with M.2 ports that can support up to PCIe 3.0 x4, so all you really need is a simple way to get from point A to point B:
Pictured above (left) is the ASUS 'Hyper Kit' adapter PCB, which was sampled to us with their new Sabertooth X99 motherboard just for testing these new 2.5" devices. The connector you see at the right may look familiar, as it is an internal Mini-SAS HD (SFF-8643) cable commonly used with high end SAS RAID cards. Intel is basically borrowing the physical spec, but rewiring those four SAS lanes over to the PCIe pins of the SFF-8639 connector at the other end of the cable.
You may be asking 'Why bother?'. Well, enthusiasts like multiple GPU configurations, and workstation systems may have their PCIe slots loaded with other devices. Since many new systems come with a capable M.2 slot, the 2.5" model could be installed on the usual mounting bracket inside a case and simply wired to the motherboard using this special cable.
It is also possible to connect the 2.5" model directly to a standard PCIe slot, but a special (and currently rare) adapter is required. Here is one provided to us by SerialCables.com:
The PCI-AD-x439-01 provided to us by SerialCables.com is a pricy option as this is a very new adapter type, but we suspect prices will come down with simpler adapter designs in the future. While writing this we spotted a lower cost PCI-AD-x439-01HF edition that also includes a cooling fan.
Specifications:
Yeah, you read that right. 440,000 IOPS. The only disappointment in the specs is the lack of an 800GB model. That seems to be a good sweet spot capacity for enthusiasts, with 400GB being too small for some and 1.2TB of flash potentially to expensive for others.
Packaging:
We received early samples of these products, and consumer packaging is not yet available. We will add a photo of their consumer packaging once we have one on hand.










I’ve been looking for the
I’ve been looking for the 400GB AIC version but so far i’ve found them for about $100 above the listed price on this website…
newegg and amazon is where i found it so far.
Have you tried booting
Have you tried booting windows from one of these? Does windows boot and load apps much faster than with a SATA SSD?
You do not need to try to
You do not need to try to verify this will be true.
If intel is only guaranteeing
If intel is only guaranteeing compatibility with Z97 and X99 platforms… how are we going to test for compatibility with everything else?
I’m on X79 and would love this drive.
I have a UEFI bios but have no idea if this will work…
Thanks.
This report says it needs
This report says it needs UEFI version 2.3.1
http://techreport.com/review/28050/intel-750-series-solid-state-drive-reviewed
That’s only part of the
That's only part of the requirement. That UEFI revision alone does not guarantee that a 750 will be bootable.
A couple of times when
A couple of times when performance suffered on the 750 you made a reference to “4k”. Can you explain 4k and how it affects this drive? Does it have anything to do with how the drive is formatted or the BIOS?
I am assuming that the 4k
I am assuming that the 4k number is because most modern file systems use 4k (4096 byte) cluster or block size. So under normal circumstances, all accesses will be aligned to 4k boundaries.
Where to buy?
Where to buy?
Newegg has it as a pre order
Newegg has it as a pre order
Hi, I heard from some reviews
Hi, I heard from some reviews that the 750 ssd has the worst boot up timing? Can anyone verify this as there is not much mentioned on the boot up timing…
I heard is incredibly slower compared to even SATA drive, (techreport review shows 51 secs boot up time for 8.1, compared to 30s for other SATA drives) hence is there any verification to this
Yes, what is up with this
Yes, what is up with this horrid boot time….worst out of 14 other drives. Plextor M6 is 15 seconds, this 1200 dollar 750 is 34 seconds…whats up, see review here.
http://techreport.com/review/28050/intel-750-series-solid-state-drive-reviewed/5
For that price, that SSD
For that price, that SSD better get boot up in 10 secs or less.
No one like to spent time waiting for PC to restart slowly while trying to fine tune their BIOS for bio flash, OCing etc. Not at this price
BIOS boot support is in early
BIOS boot support is in early stages for these, and the longer times are due to BIOS implementation – not the direct fault of the 750.
Those guys in your intel
Those guys in your intel video said it needs the UEFI 2.3.1, is that something we can download if board doesnt have it. Im getting the ASUS X99 Deluxe/3.1. Got call into asus , but have not heard back, they were researching it.
In defense of the 750, that
In defense of the 750, that linked test is not an apples to apples comparison. The boot time of the 750 was not on the same motherboard as the other times tests in their chart.
Is there a reason Intel has
Is there a reason Intel has made the firmware for the 3rd gen(?) controller so unoptimized for 0.5-2.0kb transfer sizes? It’s been like this on every single drive that has used the controller(s3700,s3500,730,p3600,p3700) from them.
What do they gain by keeping the current controllers firmware optimized like this? It’s not like these transfer sizes aren’t seen in enterprise and consumer environments.
Also, am I safe to assume that like the s3700, the intel 750 will actually gain performance by disabling trim? That’s another interesting quirk that the controller has.
All SSDs are better at 4k or
All SSDs are better at 4k or larger writes than anything under 4k. This is due to the way flash memory is programmed. Additionally, file system cluster sizes tend to be 4k or larger as well. There is little need to optimize for any transfer less than 4k.
The 2.5″ version requires the
The 2.5″ version requires the ASUS Hyper Kit.
So … Where do we get one from?
I found it stated somewhere that the SSD comes with that “cable” … which is worthless without something to plug it into.
JJ from ASUS implied that one comes with one of the ASUS motherboards, yet I see none of them on the ASUS site showing that Hyper Kit in their list of accessories nor anywhere else on the site, for that matter.
Search for the Hyper Kit on the ASUS site.
It’s like they’ve never heard of it … other than merely quoting someone’s review of the Intel 750 Series SSD … and how it requires the ASUS Hyper Kit (and thus we’re back where we started from).
I’ve Googled it and all I get are the similar SSD Review references … nothing stating where one can get one from, nor does it show up on Amazon, etc..
When anyone out there successfully completes a purchase and receipt of a 2.5″ version, could you please post a note to let us all know what was (and was not) included in the package.
(Did it include that Hyper Kit?)
Thanks.
It has been mentioned a few
It has been mentioned a few times that Intel is working with motherboard manufacturers to include the connector, the only one that comes with one right now is the new x99 sabertooth which is what pcper used to test that drive.
Just some fancy routing or
Just some fancy routing or are there any performance slowdowns to expect when using the Hyper drive kit? Did they use it in this test or was the plugin card used? I think the autor was not very specific wich one was used.
So my question is – Why isn’t
So my question is – Why isn’t there just a male M.2 PCIe connector on the 2.5″ version? Maybe I’m not understanding the electrical requirements correctly.
The drive is physically too
The drive is physically too large to fit an M.2 slot.
Finally a good SSD. I will be
Finally a good SSD. I will be getting one for sure. This will change the way we use computers.
I hated the bottleneck all other SSDs have and this solves this problem! What more can you ask for? I am also tempted to see the next version and how much faster it can get.
Nice review. Indeed a fast
Nice review. Indeed a fast storage solution- if you find it necessary.
One of the things I find not compared is the power consumption. From what I can tell, many SSDs are far better than this. It is an edge to consider if your into that.
Personally, I’d like to see more efficient and mobile solutions soon.
I want to win this DRIVE
I want to win this DRIVE
Nice storage device.. I
Nice storage device.. I really like that m.2 connector…
Amazing something to throttle
Amazing something to throttle my game even more bring it on says the king……woot
I want to win this!
I want to win this!
Would like to see someone
Would like to see someone take one of these and have Dave Dougdale over at LearningVideo.com edit some video for us to see how it would improve our workflow. Left a message at PCDIY for JJ to do it, especially since he did a build with him. Need to know if it will help in my endeavors for video editing.
What a ssd! Would love to run
What a ssd! Would love to run it in my Asus Rampage Extreme V 5960x rig!
This is the first time i see
This is the first time i see an International Contest. between Linus,Paul’s hardware, Tek Syndicate and you guys. Keep up the good job guys and thanks for the review. =D
Sweet!But will this work on
Sweet!But will this work on my Amd ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 MB?