Temperature and Overclocking Testing
Cooler Testing Methods
To best gage the quality of the GPU cooler under review, GPU temperature was taken with the graphics card idle and under load. To replicate GPU idle conditions, the system was rebooted and allowed to sit idle for 30 minutes. To replicate a stress graphics load, EVGA OC Scanner X was run over a 30 minute period using the Furry E (GPU memory burner::3072MB) 3D Test, a 1280×1024 resolution, and an 8x MSAA Antialiasing setting. After each run, the system was shut down and allowed to rest for 30 minutes to cool down. This procedure was repeated a total of 12 times – six times for the stock speed runs and six times for the overclocked speed runs.
Temperature measurements were taken directly from the GPU thermistors using TechPowerUp GPU-Z v0.8.2. For both the idle and load temperatures, the highest recorded value in the application were used for the run. Note that the temperature values are reported as deltas rather than absolute temperatures with the delta value reported calculated as GPU temperature – ambient temperature.
To adequately measure the EVGA GTX 970 SC's cooler performance, performance testing was done for all scenarios under two operational conditions – air cooled using the ACX 2.0 cooler, and liquid cooled using the modified configuration with the HeatKiller GPU-X3 GPU water block. During the tests with the modified card, it ws found that a minimal amount of airflow was needed blowing across the VRM heat sinks to prevent card instabilities.
Note that the temperature values are reported as deltas rather than absolute temperatures with the delta value reported calculated as GPU temperature – ambient temperature. For all tests, room ambient temperature was maintained between 24-26C. Sound measurements of the system cooler where taken with the sound meter placed 3 feet away from the system with all other devices in the room silenced. The Sound Meter Pro applet on a Samsung Galaxy S5 mobile phone was used to measure decibel level.
Stock Temperature Testing
The graphics card temperature testing was conducted at stock speeds with air-based and liquid-based cooling.
EVGA did a very good job in designing the ACX 2.0 cooler for the GTX 970 SC video card with it able to keep the temperatures to the upper 60s, low 70s under stress testing (assuming an ambient temperature of 25C). The idle temperature measurements are a bit high, but keep in mind that the ACX 2.0 cooler fans do not spin until the GPU reaches 60C. Adding the HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU block to the card drops temps immensely with the spread between idle and load temperatures a mere 6C. The measured GPU temperature of a mere 10C over ambient is nothing short of impressive.
Overclocked Temperature Testing
Using the EVGA Precision X 16 v5.3.3 tweaking software, the graphics card was overclocked to its highest stable settings using air-based and liquid-based cooling. For details on the overclocked settings used for testing and benchmarks, please see the Manual Overclocking section below. Note that the card required use of the Agressive fan mode through the Precision X 16 software to keep the GPU and VRM stable throughout all runs.
At overclocked speeds, the temperature differences between the air-cooled GPU and liquid-cooled GPU are not as dramatic from a pure numbers standpoint – 26C over ambient with air cooling and 12C over ambient with liquid cooling. However, the ACX 2.0 cooler required use of the Aggressive fan preset within the Precision X 16 software to maintain card stability, adding unnecessary fan noise to the mix while running through the stress test. The real strength in the liquid cooled configuration comes with the reduced fan noise and the minimal 9C delta between the idle and load temperatures.
Stock settings
Stock with ACX 2.0 cooler
With its stock ACX 2.0 cooler, the GTX 970 SC graphics card maintained a 1354MHz GPU Boost Clock speed and a 7012MHz memory speed while under load with a maximum GPU voltage of 1.2000V.
Stock with HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU block
Once HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU block was added to the card (in addition to the copper sinks on the VRMs and memory modules as well as a 120mm fan directing air flow over the sinks), something magical happened to the card's GPU Boost clock rate and GPU voltage under load. At stock settings, the card's internal logic auto-boosted the GPU Boost Clock by +40MHz to 1392MHz and the GPU voltage to 1.2120V without any user manipulation using the Precision X 16 software. Not too shabby for the simple act of liquid cooling the GPU. Do note that this 40MHz boost in GPU core speed made little difference in the stock benchmark numbers, which is why only a single set is shown on the Benchmarks page.
Manual Overclocking
Using water-based cooling on a graphics card has a direct effect on the operating temperature of the cooled components because of the coolant's more efficient heat absorption properties in comparison with air-based heat dissipation. The lower operating temperature of the graphic card's components indirectly effects the card overclocking potential, allowing the card to attain faster performance because of the liquid coolant's more efficient heat dissipation. For testing the full potential of the GTX 970 SC card, overclocking threshold testing was performed with the card operating in air-cooled only mode using the stock ACX 2.0 cooler and in liquid-cooled mode using the HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU block.
For both overclocking tests, EVGA's Precision X 16 tweaking software (v5.3.3) was used to enable the settings with TechPowerUp GPU-Z (v0.8.2) used to validate the settings properly took effect. Graphics card stability was tested by performing a full run through the FutureMark 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark with a 1920×1080 resolution without crash or artifacting. Once the 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark run stabilized, card stability was checked using the Unigine Heaven, Grid 2, and Metro: Last Light in-game benchmark tests. The settings were further refined until no artifacting or crashes occurred in any of those applications. To further ensure card operational reliability at the configured settings, the card was torture tested over an extended period with EVGA OC Scanner X using the Furry E (GPU memory burner::3072MB) 3D Test, a 1280×1024 resolution, and an 8x MSAA Antialiasing setting.
Air-cooled Overclocking Results
Using the GTX 970 SC's stock ACX 2.0 air-based cooler, we were able to get the card stable at a GPU boost clock speed of 1479 MHz (+125) with a memory speed of 7808 MHz (+400).
EVGA Precision X 16 profile settings
- GPU Clock Offset – +125MHz
- Memory Clock Offset – +400MHz
- GPU Voltage Overvoltage – +12mV (Max)
- Power Target – 110% (Max)
- GPU Temperature Target – 91C (Max)
- Fan Preset – Aggressive
Performance numbers
- GPU Boost Clock Speed – 1479MHz
- Memory Speed – 7808MHz
- GPU voltage – 1.2000V
Liquid-cooled Overclocking Results
Running the GTX 970 SC card with the modded configuration and the HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU water block placed in-line with the Raystorm CPU block, we were able to increase the GPU boost clock and memory speeds to 1542 MHz (+150) and 8004 MHz (+500). The GPU boost clock was actually increased by +190MHz over the stock air-cooled settings if you figure in the free +40MHz boost that the card experienced at stock with the addition of the GPU block. This translates to a 50% increase in the GPU boost clock settings and a 20% increase in memory clock settings over the overclock settings achieved with the ACX 2.0 cooler by adding the GPU block, memory sinks, and backplate to the card.
EVGA Precision X 16 profile settings
- GPU Clock Offset – +150MHz
- Memory Clock Offset – +500MHz
- GPU Voltage Overvoltage – +25mV (Max)
- Power Target – 110% (Max)
- GPU Temperature Target – 91C (Max)
- Fan Preset – N/A
Performance numbers
- GPU Boost Clock Speed – 1542MHz
- Memory Speed – 8004MHz
- GPU voltage – 1.2120V
Sound Testing
At stock speeds, the noise generated by the ACX 2.0 cooler cannot be beat. The cooler does not even spin up the fans until the GPU hits 60C. Even at temperatures above 60C, the ACX 2.0 cooler is virtually silent. The strength of the HeatKiller GPU-X3 Core GPU water block comes into play while overclocking. The fan speed and generated noise does not increase at all, while the ACX 2.0 cooler must use a steep fan curve to maintain stability (as shown in the Precision X 16 screen shot of the fan settings). The water cooled system was virtually silent compared to the building crescendo of the GPU fans. However, the fans were able to maintain the card at a respectable temperature under load despite the additional fan noise.
Why didn’t this come around
Why didn’t this come around when I was building a new rig so i wouldn’t have to get a 980GTX for a watetblock?
Now you have a 980 to try it
Now you have a 980 to try it out on?
I need to go back to reading
I need to go back to reading the articles, its a mod not a card. /derp
this just makes me wish all
this just makes me wish all cards came with an AIO liquid cooler option, hopefully AMD’s new offering will help make this a trend.
look at the performance of evga’s AIO gtx980ti, and that is a reference board.
nice write up and hope all is well.
IMO this think looks cheesey
IMO this think looks cheesey and cheap. those stick on ram coolers, yea umm no. who knows how long they will stay stuck on to the ram before falls off and who knows what will happen.
IMO if you are gonna water cool should just go with a full coverage block my evga hydrocopper.
I have a machine with an 8,
I have a machine with an 8, year old gpu in it using those ramsinks and not one has budged… I think you’re a bit too paranoid
I’ve had great experience
I’ve had great experience with Swiftech universal blocks. What I like about them is you can reuse them on any new card you go with, versus having to buy a new full coverage block every time you go to upgrade and you want to water cool.
They pretty much do make an
They pretty much do make an AIO version of the 970….But a AIO cooler and then buy the nzxt bracket to mount the cooler onto the card. It is SUPER easy to do and it dropped my temps by 20 deg
Personally, I didn’t see
Personally, I didn’t see enough of the upside to do this.
You saw the load temps,
You saw the load temps, right?
I’m a clumsy dumb ass who has
I’m a clumsy dumb ass who has bricked a card with an aftermarket cooler. I miss the days when a watercooler could almost double performance. So I can see folks holding off, but the noise reduction is phenomenal.
I watercooled both my 970
I watercooled both my 970 ftw’s and have them overclocked to over stock 980 specs. I could not accomplish this without the watercooling. I don’t think it doubled performance but it added a TON.
Personally, I’ll leave it up
Personally, I’ll leave it up to the overclocking audience. My issues are mostly general user. In short- my arguments are not for the challenge of overclocking as having moved on from that interest.
Overclocking on this kind of margin is generally overcome by the next generation of video cards. The heat won’t make a compelling difference in the warranty of the GPU if you don’t overclock. The heat issued doesn’t change very much- it’s only displaced somewhere else- notable for those who pay AC. But the thing I noticed in this one was the sound. I’d have to look at a fan as well. I have to admit I’ve come to love my mouse quiet system and video card. I game less than I work so a handful of FPS just isn’t worth it.
Well, enough of being a drug. I’ve decided that if I’m going to look into this effort, I want a notble bang.
PS, I have a 980- that might be fun too- if a little more pricey.
Mouse quiet? I don’t know
Mouse quiet? I don’t know about that! I have a little pet rodent and He is very loud sometimes! Especially if his bowl is empty or he wants picked up. And when I am sleeping he always bangs on his wheel until I let him out, Then after I let him out he keeps me awake from jumping up and down of the bed or walking on my head! So no! Little rodents are very noisy!
Well, of course they look
Well, of course they look impressive at first sight, but keep in mind: the air cooled temps are still solidly within nominal range with lots of reserve to spare, even though the cooling uses the silent profile.
And the low temps are bought with a much higher idle noise level. And yes, pcper, you can still go to Zero speed when idle, even when OC. Makes me wonder if they even tried to adjust the fan curve to achieve a stable OC with minimal noise or just went with the full blown Agressive setting (to make the watercooler look at least somewhat competitive?) – the far lower delta temps do suggest the latter.
And what for? For a ~3-3.5% increase from air to water OC, and an impressive, but ultimately pointless low delta T?
Sorry, not impressed.
Nice article, although I
Nice article, although I don’t think Maxwell benefits too much from improved cooling. I’d like to see the benefits on a 290X or something else whose overclocking is generally limited by temps rather than arbitrary power limits.
I have been looking into
I have been looking into doing something like this on just one of evga 970s, the top one gets very hot. Thanks for the write-up.
I have two Evga 970 SC models
I have two Evga 970 SC models just like the one used here. Despite the cards running relatively cool, I can’t get them past 1404Mhz reliably. They always seem fine (no artifacting and the temps are fine), but eventually after around 3hrs under load the NVidia driver fails. This doesn’t happen in all games, and hilariously it doesn’t happen in furmark. Is this a driver thing or are my cards just poor?
Also, I used to have stick on heatsinks on a modified X700 from years ago. I remember my memory overclock fell off a cliff one day and I opened my case to discover a few of the heatsinks sitting on the floor of the case…
Thanks for doing this test to
Thanks for doing this test to show us what is possible, but for the time and money that would go into something like this negates the positives imo. I already got a 1516MHz actual in-game boost clock using the stock air cooler on my GTX 970, and fan noise (auto) and temps (83C) are not an issue.
The stock fans on my H100i need to be swapped out for something quieter though…
I have had 6 of the black
I have had 6 of the black cougar vortex PWM fans for a few years and I can vouch for there quietness and good airflow. They direct the air strait out of the fan,not in a cone shape like most fans do. Their build quality is fantastic and they have a very very long unrealistic lifespan listed for them of 300,000 hours.
I had them on my 4.5-5.0 ghz 2600k’s original H-50 and they performed better then the enermax magma’s I had on it originally but in the last 5 months I upgraded the cooler to the fantastic 38mm thinck radiator Cooler Master Nepton 140XL and it came with 2 140mm jet flow fans that are crazy loud at 80-100% but at 60% and under thy become pretty silent and they have great static pressure and even with a ambient temp around 29c the 2600k at 4660mhz tops out at 67c after 20 minutes of Intel burntest v2 with the fans at 65%
Good review……but it
Good review……but it definitly needed some other cards benchmarked for comparison. Like a regular 980, 290/X etc,but the regular 980 is what I think people would like to see if a 150 or so dollar GPU can hang with a higher tiered card.
Also I realize you used a waterblock you had on hand but any real water cooling fan would use a full cover waterblock, they look better and perform better buy keeping the vrms and other hotspots near ambient temperature which is paramount when pushing a card at its highest function able overclock especially if you want it to survive longer than 6 months to a year.
Water cooling and modding is
Water cooling and modding is not just about putting things together with off the shelf parts, but experimenting with what you have to see if you can get decent performance without killing your budget. I've been water cooling my rig for a long time (over 10 years) with many iterations in my build and cooling apparatus, so I think I more than qualify as a "real" water cooling enthusiast. This was more of an experiment to see how well it would work, and it seemed to work pretty well in my opinion.
Thanks for the feedback though…
How far can you push that
How far can you push that card if you do the BIOS mod to increase the power limit, and voltage limit to 1.285V?
That’s exactly what I was
That’s exactly what I was thinking.
Or more importantly how far can you push a Ti or Titan with a custom Bios and water cooling?
At stock you can only increase the TPD by 10% on the Ti & Titan but you can increase by 25% on the 970 & 980. So opening up that extra power could provide a very good boost.
Epic fail that the VRM’s
Epic fail that the VRM’s aren’t watercooled, wrong water block chosen if you ask me.
I’ve been running 2x GTX 970
I’ve been running 2x GTX 970 in SLI on a mATX board in a mATX case hooked up to G20 AIO liquid cooler brackets on corsair 140mm kits. They run about 40C all day even heavily overclocked. Really good set up.
if they sold these complete
if they sold these complete I’d think about it
cant get my evga gtx sc past
cant get my evga gtx sc past on stock cooler, but is stable
GPU 1467
MEM 3764