When I was in my Physics program, there was a running joke that the word “Nano” should be a red flag when reading research papers. This one has graphene and nanoparticles, but it lacks quantum dots and it looks privately funded by a company, so we might be good. Kidding aside, while I have little experience with battery technology, they claim to have surrounded silicon anodes for lithium batteries with a layer of graphene.
Image Credit: Samsung via Nature
This addition of graphene is said to counteract an issue where silicon expands as it is used and recharged. The paper, which again is the first source that I have seen discuss this issue, says that other attempts at using silicon adds vacant space around the anode for future growth. If you can keep the material at the same volume over its lifespan, you will be able to store more electricity in smaller devices. I wonder why Samsung would want something like that…
This structure may be totally
This structure may be totally simulated, us electrons and protons and a 4D space. Mass is unnecessary since the simulation has the particle count assuming a neutron is an electron and proton confinement. For the simulator, I use +/-1 for charge, location in increments of 1 and compute each attribute at each point, using a space defined with each axis with the same unit, either length or time, lambda nu = C therefore a mapping to define the measurement, review any level of this configuration. you really only need color for the field configuration and a proper legend, or a video broken down into whatever minimal event or .. sort it!
Particles as waves do not work. not sure I see the stability conditions; if particles may transfer through each other as waves, there’s a problem with proximity and the wave always appears as a relative E field based upon the observers attributes and not the attribute of Dr. E.
Try it! You can see it in your head, depending upon the frequency of inquiry, and oscillation, circular, linear, laminar, turbulent, motion, field, event, …
Tip me when you take over the world! I just don’t have the tools.
I might be over my head here,
I might be over my head here, maybe you really know what you are talking about, but im pretty sure we have zero evidence of the existence of a 4th spatial dimension, and could never test your proposal in practice.
^^ my thoughts exactly . beat
^^ my thoughts exactly . beat me to it .
hi there this is master
hi there this is master yeah earth has a 4d battery 4 dimisions bult too leave earth 3 d wrold or 3d dimmisions