Light on architecture details
Thought Intel has provided very little in terms of technical information, Skylake is here FIRST for the enthusiasts and gamers. Is it worth it?
Our Intel Skylake launch coverage is intense! Make sure you hit up all the stories and videos that are interesting for you!
- The Intel Core i7-6700K Review – Skylake First for Enthusiasts (Video)
- Skylake vs. Sandy Bridge: Discrete GPU Showdown (Video)
- ASUS Z170-A Motherboard Preview
- Intel Skylake / Z170 Rapid Storage Technology Tested – PCIe and SATA RAID
The Intel Skylake architecture has been on our radar for quite a long time as Intel's next big step in CPU design. Through leaks and some official information discussed by Intel over the past few months, we know at least a handful of details: DDR4 memory support, 14nm process technology, modest IPC gains and impressive GPU improvements. But the details have remained a mystery on how the "tock" of Skylake on the 14nm process technology will differ from Broadwell and Haswell.
Interestingly, due to some shifts in how Intel is releasing Skylake, we are going to be doing a review today with very little information on the Skylake architecture and design (at least officially). While we are very used to the company releasing new information at the Intel Developer Forum along with the launch of a new product, Intel has instead decided to time the release of the first Skylake products with Gamescom in Cologne, Germany. Parts will go on sale today (August 5th) and we are reviewing a new Intel processor without the background knowledge and details that will be needed to really explain any of the changes or differences in performance that we see. It's an odd move honestly, but it has some great repercussions for the enthusiasts that read PC Perspective: Skylake will launch first as an enthusiast-class product for gamers and DIY builders.
For many of you this won't change anything. If you are curious about the performance of the new Core i7-6700K, power consumption, clock for clock IPC improvements and anything else that is measurable, then you'll get exactly what you want from today's article. If you are a gear-head that is looking for more granular details on how the inner-workings of Skylake function, you'll have to wait a couple of weeks longer – Intel plans to release that information on August 18th during IDF.
So what does the addition of DDR4 memory, full range base clock manipulation and a 4.0 GHz base clock on a brand new 14nm architecture mean for users of current Intel or AMD platforms? Also, is it FINALLY time for users of the Core i7-2600K or older systems to push that upgrade button? (Let's hope so!)
Intel's Skylake Enthusiast Push
Get this folks: PC gaming is a thriving business. Intel first attempted to make good with enthusiasts and overclockers with the release of Devil's Canyon, the Core i7-4790K. That CPU boosted clock speeds at a slight TDP increase while pushing clocks to their highest out-of-box settings yet. They were fully unlocked and priced very competitively against previous Haswell-based processors. They were great parts and I was glad to see Intel investing some money and resources in a community that most of us thought that it had written off.
Intel today offers another olive branch to our readers and fans.
"Take ye thine Skylake processor, with unlocketh overclock settings and DDR4 memory, and continueth innovation on the open and scalable platform. Eth."
Kindheartedness aside, Intel is in for the money: PC gaming continues to be big business. Game revenues are the largest form of software sales, gaming across all platforms leads all other forms of entertainment and that crazy eSport segment is expected to grow from 89M to 145M units by 2017.
And as any PC gamer knows, the PC is where the real innovation occurs. Yes, Xbox owners have the Kinect, but nearly every other noteworthy shift happens on the PC. Virtual reality, downloadable gaming, streaming gaming, free to play, etc. – these are all technologies and directions that were started or perfect on the PC. Intel wants to make sure they are part of that, and not just in a passive manner.
Let's first take a look at the specifications of the two new Skylake 6th Generation Intel Core processors launching today.
Core i7-6700K | Core i5-6600K | Core i7-5775C | Core i7-4790K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-3770K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Skylake | Skylake | Broadwell | Haswell | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
Process Tech | 14nm | 14nm | 14nm | 22nm | 22nm | 22nm |
Socket | LGA 1151 | LGA 1151 | LGA 1150 | LGA 1150 | LGA 1150 | LGA 1155 |
Cores/Threads | 4/8 | 4/4 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4/8 |
Base Clock | 4.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Max Turbo Clock | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Memory Tech | DDR4 | DDR4 | DDR3 | DDR3 | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Memory Speeds | Up to 2133 MHz | Up to 2133 MHz | Up to 1600 MHz | Up to 1600 MHz | Up to 1600 MHz | Up to 1600 MHz |
Cache (L4 Cache) | 8MB | 6MB | 6MB (128MB) | 8MB | 8MB | 8MB |
System Bus | DMI3 – 8.0 GT/s | DMI3 – 8.0 GT/s | DMI2 – 6.4 GT/s | DMI2 – 5.0 GT/s | DMI2 – 5.0 GT/s | DMI2 – 5.0 GT/s |
Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | HD Graphics 530 | Iris Pro 6200 | HD Graphics 4600 | HD Graphics 4600 | HD Graphics 4000 |
Max Graphics Clock | ? | ? | 1.15 GHz | 1.25 GHz | 1.25 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
TDP | 91W | 91W | 65W | 88W | 84W | 77W |
MSRP | $350 | $243 | $366 | $339 | $339 | $332 |
Based on the same 14nm process as Broadwell, a CPU architecture that only recently saw a release to the DIY builder (and only then in a pair of options), Skylake is still built around a quad-core, HyperThreading capable design. The base clock speed of 4.0 GHz matches that of the Core i7-4790K though the maximum Turbo clock rate of 4.2 GHz is 200 MHz slower than we saw on the Devil's Canyon part. Still, with reasonable IPC improvements from Haswell to Skylake, that matched clock speed should result in noticeable performance improvements.
One change that we did notice for the Skylake architecture is its move away from the FIVR, Fully Integrated Voltage Regulator. It was first introduced during the Haswell architecture disclosure and was touted as revolutionary, simplifying the board and platform design significantly. However with Broadwell we already saw some back peddling as Intel admitted having to by-pass the FIVR for ultra-low power implementations due to efficiency issues. This time the company says that removing it "enabled improved power efficiency" across a "much broader range of thermal design powers." This means that from 2-in-1s to desktop gaming PCs, the power delivery solution returns to the motherboard.
The biggest specification change (other than the new socket) is the move to DDR4 memory technology. Yes, Skylake will be able to support both DDR3L and DDR4. DDR3L integration will, with a few exceptions, only occur on low-cost solutions like notebooks and tablets. This marks the second consumer platform to integrate DDR4, following the release of Haswell-E and the X99 chipset nearly a year ago. Official specs limit the DDR4 memory speed to 2133 MHz but, in our testing with the new ASUS Z170-Deluxe motherboard and memory from Corsair and G.Skill, getting 3400 MHz is definitely possible.
The system bus design has also been upgraded this time; we are now on the third revision of DMI with a bump in performance to 8.0 GT/s, which is equivalent to x4 lanes of PCI Express 3.0. This upgrade in bandwidth turns out to be incredibly useful for platform builders like ASUS that can take advantages of up to 20 lanes of PCIe 3.0 on the Z170 chipset itself! That means new storage options, configurations and more expandability for the non-E level of processors from Intel.
The integrated graphics on Skylake are drastically improved though the details on how they are doing it are still a mystery until we get to IDF. Our IGP test shows nearly 50% performance improvements for the Intel HD Graphics 530 compared to the HD Graphics 4600 on Haswell. As it turns out, Broadwell and the Core i7-5775C with its Iris Pro graphics and eDRAM implementation are still going to blow the Core i7-6700K out of the water, but more on that later.
Thermal levels of the Core i7-6700K rest at 91 watts, just a handful higher than the Core i7-4790K and 4770K. The Core i7-5775C is much lower thanks to a lower clock speed set. The important thing here is that Skylake scales well up to this TDP level and provides excellent performance along the way. The fear of having Intel completely abandon the DIY market with process tech and CPU designs that are only geared for low-power implementations has been alleviated for at least one more generation.
Finally, look at that price. With the Core i7-4790K selling today for $339, Intel is listing the tray price of the Core i7-6700K at $350! And, after the initial launch excitement, you can expect this price to settle another $10-20 down. Of course this will require you to upgrade your motherboard as well as your system memory so the total upgrade cost is going to be higher but Intel seems to be reaching out olive branches in several areas with today's announcement. I know more than a handful of PC gamers that will be using this opportunity to upgrade from aging Sandy Bridge / Ivy Bridge systems so the price to entry is a welcome data point.
Though I am focusing on the Core i7-6700K for today's story as that was the sample we were sent, Intel is also pushing out a Core i5-6600K today with a price of $243. That CPU will run four cores without HyperThreading, a base clock of 3.5 GHz and a maximum Turbo clock of 3.9 GHz. Other than the 6MB of cache (as opposed to 8MB) the rest of the specifications and capabilities remain unchanged.
looks better!
looks better!
Every reviewer keeps downing
Every reviewer keeps downing on the integrated graphics, but according to the linked article, DirectX 12 will utilize the integrated along with the discrete. They say it will be like having another graphics card…
http://time.com/3975043/windows-10-microsoft-gamers/
‘How many video cards do you have in your PC? Think carefully (I didn’t, and told Wardell, who asked me the same question, just one). Wardell reminded me most modern PCs have at least two (not counting extremely high-end systems with cards run in tandem, in which case the number would be three or more).
“Everyone forgets about the integrated graphics card on the motherboard that you’d never use for gaming if you have a dedicated video card,” says Wardell. “With DirectX 12, you can fold in that integrated card as a seamless coprocessor. The game doesn’t have to do anything special, save support DirectX 12 and have that feature enabled. As a developer I don’t have to figure out which thing goes to what card, I just turn it on and DirectX 12 takes care of it.”
Wardell notes the performance boost from pulling in the integrated video card is going to be heavily dependent on the specific combination—the performance gap between integrated video cards over the past half-decade isn’t small—but at the high end, he says it could be as significant as DirectX 12’s ability to tap the idle cores in your CPU. Add the one on top of the other and, if he’s right, the shift at a developmental level starts to sound like that rare confluence of evolutionary plus the letter ‘r’.’
What’s in this new CPU for
What’s in this new CPU for video editors?
Dude, upgrade your Handbrake
Dude, upgrade your Handbrake software. The new version is way better optimized for 4+ core setups.
Also, how come nobody is comparing the 6700K to the 5820K? I’d rather pay a little more and get 6 cores instead of 4.
if review sites compare 5820K
if review sites compare 5820K with 6700K no one will buy the 6700K.
Looking forward to the next
Looking forward to the next I7 WITHOUT integrated GPU… 🙂 CMonnnn Intel !
Lol I’ll just stick with this
Lol I’ll just stick with this Phenom II x6 for another year. Someone get back to me when CPU performance has increased by an order of magnitude (aka when Intel gets real competition again).
I hope PC gamers do not get
I hope PC gamers do not get these CPUs. I don’t want to see people waste money on this platform if you are in the market for building a gaming PC. The cost of DDR4 right now is just stupid expensive and motherboards for this are expensive. There are no incredible gains with either and you’d save a ton of money going with a 4790k or something similar on LGA 1150.
Except if you actually look
Except if you actually look at prices, DDR4-2400 4GB sticks are cheaper than their DDR3 counterparts. $30 vs $33
I’m one of the people hanging
I’m one of the people hanging grimly on to my old X58 platforms, of which I have two on ASUS P6T motherboards.
I’m in no rush to upgrade GPU from a pair of GTX680’s in SLI, and no rush for faster HDD with 2x 240GB in Raid, so the question I have is, is it REALLY worth Dropping $2k to upgrade a motherboard / ram / cpu / psu.
Last year, for AUS$100 each, I replaced my i7-920 parts with Xeon hexacore units, which at 4ghz / 6 thread+HT (12 thread) seem to do fine.
If I look at the IPC@3.5ghz above, and reckon that a new 6700K part will be a full 1/3rd faster per core, it strikes me that I’m only behind on single core performance with even such an old setup! 6 cores at 1.0 each vs 4 cores at 1.33 each for example, even if I’m generous and say a 6700K perfoms 1.5x per core of the Xeon, I’m still packing the same processing punch.
Is that a fair assessment, or am I missing something? –
What I’m really asking is, if you have an old X58 platform – and aren’t aiming for quad-sli or something requiring more pcie lanes than you have, isn’t a $100 i7 to Xeon upgrade going to be enough to keep you in the game?
Is the IPC increase on a quad core worth the $2000 price tag, because I suspect you wouldn’t notice the difference much!
I tend to play slightly older games, just finished mass effect series and bioshock for example, so I suspect the very latest titles would give issues to my setup, so I know it’s adequate for me as I never see the CPU taxed much.
Buying chipsets with crappy
Buying chipsets with crappy on-board gpu’s will encourage them to make more and the fact is that the speed is topping out because of the limitations of wave speed through the material the chips are made of, bus speed of external gpu’s and the limits of the expanion slots speed are the real limits still left, that and doing all the binary physics and mathing out the hardware to function 3-dimensionally and running the signal to and from an expansion slot takes time.