Testing Configuration and Benchmarks Used
To verify that the motherboard works as advertised, the board was run through our standard benchmark suite. In most cases, the results are presented for the motherboard under review as well as a different similar-class motherboards for performance comparison purposes. The benchmark tests used should give you a good understanding of the board’s capabilities for both office and gaming use so that you, the reader, can make a more informed purchasing decision.
Test System Setup | |
Motherboards |
Intel X99-based systems ASUS X99-E WS ASUS X99-A Intel Z170-based systems ASUS Z170-A Intel Z97-based system ASUS Z97-Pro |
CPU |
Intel X99-based systems Intel Core i7-5960X (3.0GHz CPU and Ring Bus, 30 x 100MHz Base Clock) Intel Z170-based system Intel Core i7-6700K (4.0GHz CPU and Ring Bus, 40 x 100MHz Base Clock) Intel Z97-based system Intel Core i7-4770K (3.5GHz CPU and Ring Bus, 35 x 100MHz Base Clock) |
Memory |
Intel X99-based systems Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 modules (2133MHz, 15-17-17-35-1T, 1.225V) Intel Z170-based system Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 modules (1600MHz, 16-18-18-35-1T, 1.225V) Intel Z97-based system Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1866 modules (1600MHz, 9-10-9-27-1T, 1.525V) |
Hard Drive |
Intel 730 240GB SSD Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA III HD |
Sound Card | On-board sound |
Video Card |
ASUS Poseidon GTX 780 3GB NVIDIA GTX 570 1.25GB |
CPU Cooling |
XSPC Raystorm D5 Photon RX480 V3 WaterCooling Kit Corsair Hydro Series™ H100i Extreme Performance CPU Cooler |
Video Drivers | NVIDIA 353.62 |
Power Supply | Corsair HX750 |
Operating System | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
Test Setup Explanation
The 64-bit Windows 10 based test bench used for Intel X99 LGA2011-V3 board testing includes an Intel Core i7-5960X CPU, 32GB of DDR4-2666 memory, an ASUS Poseidon GTX 780 3GB video card or an NVIDIA GTX 570 1.25GB video card, and an Intel 730 240GB SSD drive. For Intel Z170 LGA1151 board testing, an Intel Core i7-6700K processor, 16GB of DDR4-2666 memory, an ASUS Poseidon GTX 780 3GB video card, and an Intel 730 240GB SSD drive were used in the test system. For the Z97-based board testing, an Intel Core i7-4770K CPU, 16GB of DDR3-2400 memory, an ASUS Poseidon GTX 780 3GB video card, and an Intel 730 240GB SSD drive were used in the test system. Using the selected components gives us the ability to demonstrate the motherboard’s capabilities rather than that of the components themselves.
NOTE: For ASUS X99-E WS motherboard testing, a Corsair Hydro Series™ H100i Extreme Performance CPU Cooler and an NVIDIA GTX 570 video card were used for most board testing. However, the ASUS Poseidon GTX 780 video card was used for the PCMark 8 benchmark tests only to ensure equivalent results with the other test systems because of the impact of the system GPU on these specific benchmark test results.
Benchmark Tests used for evaluation:
- SoftPerfect Research NetWorx Speed Test v5.41
- LanBench v1.1.0
- ATTO Disk Benchmark v3.05
- SiSoft Sandra 2015 SP2b (v2015.07.21.42)
- Intel Linpack Benchmark v11.3.0.004
- Maxon Cinebench R15
- PCMark 8 v2.4.304
Could you give more details
Could you give more details on how the OC socket works and how well it performs compared to other competitor’s approach for this?
OS Support – No Windows 10 😛
Wow – eSATA ports are back 🙂
First. Thanks for the review.
First. Thanks for the review. This is a great looking board and Beast like you said. My only gripe is since this is the EXREME platform using the H100i which clearly is not enough for more aggressive overclocking just like you said in the reveiw that it was maybe holding it back. Question is when using Ek Predator or H240x from Switech with a real copper Radiator if it is possible to reach 4.5 Ghz or not ? I am maybe nitpicking but like I said 5960X and a 550$$ motherboard deserve to get the best cooling out there to be tested on in my opinion !
I used the EK’s cooling
I used the EK’s cooling results to compare various AIO options and the H100i displayed roughly 1-2 hotter temps then their EK option.
Per this review and your comment, I believe an AIO solution may not be enough to cool the 5960X further. However, from various reviews; 4.3GHz to 4.6GHz is found to be the common stable OC range for the 5960X.
If your build allows, I would go with the Predator from EK. Not only is it an AIO option, but the larger rad allows for better cooling and if you want to convert to a full water system, the Predator has the adaptors for it.
No I am talking for the
No I am talking for the Review so Morry does not have to build a custom loop every time and I would NEVER use an AIO cause I am hardcore water cooler m8 😉 = AI not AIO = ALL IN = ME 😀 😀 :D.
In previous reviews, the
In previous reviews, the Corsair H100i was plenty capable of keeping my 5960X cool and stable at 4.5GHz. With this review, I think the Corsair cooler was having problems because of age more than anything. You have to realize that I've used and abused that AIO cooler for years with 10's if not closer to 100 mounts and dismounts, so I would chalk the issues up to the cooler going bad rather than a board issue.
That said, I am using a custom loop for both my test benches now to ensure that the cooler does not become a bottleneck for board testing…
All right my man…Nice
All right my man…Nice
The link on the front page to
The link on the front page to this article is wrong.
Only ONE M.2 slot on this
Only ONE M.2 slot on this workstation mainboard? But on Z170 gaming boards there are 2 or 3 M.2 slots? WTF?
Relax. It is an old board
Relax. It is an old board (much older than Skylake chipsets) just with USB 3.1 added. Asus would be mad to rework whole board just to add 2 USB ports and another quirky M.2. Want more M.2 go with newer Skylake.
IMHO WS board don’t need M.2 whatsoever. You have RAID AICs for that. At least I know I have, because RAID 0 is no RAID at all.
Not very good reviews from
Not very good reviews from Newegg and Amazon…
dual 8 pin CPU power… how
dual 8 pin CPU power… how many watts ?!@?!?
Note: you need to fix the
Note: you need to fix the “Continue reading our preview of the ASUS X99-E WS/USB 3.1 motherboard!” link on this post.
Got it, thanks.
Got it, thanks.
No PS/2 port? It’s useless!
No PS/2 port? It’s useless!
Ditch the SATA-Express ports
Ditch the SATA-Express ports and
support at least 4 integrated U.2 ports.
See photos of the ASUS Z170 Premium:
by removing the 2 SATA-Express ports,
there’s plenty of room for 3 more U.2 ports.
Yes, I realize this shifts the bottleneck
to the DMI link, so let’s start talking
about higher upstream bandwidth too.
MRFS
https://twitter.com/OC3D/stat
https://twitter.com/OC3D/status/645938923580035073/photo/1