Completed Build, Performance, and Conclusion

The completed build with an air cooler shows a clean layout, and my sagging GPU. This isn't the fault of the case, which had enough rigidity with the rear panel to prevent this – my XFX R9 290X DD has a pretty flimsy construction and has always sagged. It looks like airflow should be good, and I expect decent numbers when we move on to test results.

Behind the motherboard tray things are pretty cramped with the SSD bracket in the middle of things. To further complicate cable organization there is precious little clearance behind the back panel, and I had to work harder than usual to compact the cable mess and prevent a bowed panel. It came together just fine in the end, but cable management was this enclosure's weak point in the build process.

Temperature and Noise Performance

The smaller 400C didn't fare as well as the 600Q in this department overall, but had a nice showing compared to the similarly priced Fractal Design Define S, which is also a mid-tower design. I have found that larger enclosures often have an advantage when it comes to temps, and the larger Carbide 600Q results demonstrate this.

The 400C performed very well with GPU temperatures, coming in second overall and even outperforming the 600Q with high fans. This is a testament to the good airflow provided with the default fan configuration, which uses a front intake and rear exhaust fan lined up perfectly to force out hot air from an aftermarket cooler like the test system's R9 290X.

Noise results were less impressive overall, with the case fans determining idle noise (they are louder than either tested cooler at idle), and the vented top allowing much of the component fan noise to be easily heard at load. For a quiet experience components with low fan speeds could be employed, but Corsair offers the enclosure in a quiet (the 400Q) version for those concerned with component noise.

Conclusion

The Carbide 400C has more to offer than just a great side panel, though the hinged door and latch work smoothly and greatly add to the attractiveness of the design. The case is well built, though not quite as solid feeling as the Carbide 600Q I recently reviewed. Some of the metal is a bit thinner, and overall the construction does feel a level below the 600 series. But that's actually in line with the pricing, as Corsair didn't choose to simply offer a mid-tower version for the same $149.99 retail . The Carbide 400C is a $99 case (as is the quiet version, 400Q), and the differences I notices were completely in line with this price difference.

The Carbide 400C is a very nice looking case that's easy to build in, and with the excellent hinged door it joins the Fractal Design Define S (reviewed here) as one of the best enclosures I've seen in the $80-$100 mid-tower enclosure segment.

Strengths

  • Outstanding hinged door panel design
  • Attractive appearance
  • Solid build quality
  • Compact size for a mid-tower

Weaknesses

  • Limited clearance behind motherboard for cable management
  • HDD mount can interfere with a longer PSU

Attention to detail and a fantastic clear door panel are highlights of this fine mid-tower enclosure from Corsair. An easy recommendation for anyone looking for a mid-tower case in this price range.

« PreviousNext »