The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3 (DirectX 11)
Played in a third-person perspective, players control protagonist Geralt of Rivia, a monster hunter known as a witcher, who sets out on a long journey through the Northern Kingdoms. In the game, players battle against the world's many dangers using swords and magic, while interacting with non-player characters and completing side quests and main missions to progress through the story. The game was met with critical acclaim and was a financial success, selling over 6 million copies in six weeks. The game won multiple Game of the Year awards from various gaming publications, critics, and game award shows, including the Golden Joystick Awards, The Game Awards, Game Developers Choice Awards, and SXSW Gaming Awards. –Wikipedia
Settings used for The Witcher 3
In the heavy-hitting The Witcher 3, the GeForce GTX 1060 is able to push out 78 average FPS at 1080p, equaling the performance of the GTX 980 and coming in 20% faster than the GXT 970. Obviously the GTX 1070 has a strong lead (28%). AMD's Radeon RX 480 falls 11% back in our testing.
Increasing the resolution, I was able to eek out just over 50 FPS on the GeForce GX 1060. Performance comparisons to the GTX 980 remain the same, though the Radeon RX 480 is able to creep in on GP106's territory and ends up just 4% slower than the GTX 1060.
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, Average FPS Comparisons, The Witcher 3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX 980 | GTX 970 | GTX 1070 | RX 480 | ||
1920×1080 | -1% | +20% | -28% | +11% | |
2560×1440 | -2% | +13% | -28% | +4% |
This table presents the above data in a more basic way, focusing only on the average FPS, so keep that in mind.
Oh how you convenietly left
Oh how you convenietly left out RX480 4GB for 199$ out of whole review lol.
Because guess what: 1060 for 270-280$ is tough sell against 480 gor 199$ thats only slightly slower and with much much better future outlook *khm* Doom *khm*
How is 4GB of memory a better
How is 4GB of memory a better futureproof outlook than 6 GB of memory?
%10 up or down makes no
%10 up or down makes no difference in real life gaming. amd being broke is the reason we are getting laptop chips for $299 and cpus for $1700.
all the AMD fanboys here are
all the AMD fanboys here are just butt hurt that the 1060 gtx is a superior card to the rx 480 thats why they feel the need to troll this article lol
Why AMD sucks?
rx480 die
Why AMD sucks?
rx480 die size: 232 mm²
gtx1060 die size: 200 mm²
and yet, 1060 is beating 480,
rx480 tflops: 5.1 TFLOPS
gtx1060 tflops: 3.85 TFLOPS
so yea, AMD is just throwing power in air with not optimizing arhitecture, becouse they are fucking sitting on there ass’s and not doing there job, so now nvidia is guilty for that, yea right AMD fun boys -.-
AMD victim marketing has been
AMD victim marketing has been strong in the last few years. A lot of people got fooled.
So, I’d love to buy a 1060
So, I’d love to buy a 1060 Founder’s edition, but the buttons son the nvidia website that say “Buy Now” are dead.
So what’s the story? They all gone, or not actually available to buy yet?
Why do the other editions all look so ugly? My faves have been ASUS in the past and they all look sharp, not dorky.
Thx, wp
They are being bought faster
They are being bought faster than Nvidia can produce them. At leasts thats what Nvidia claim. It could be artificial scarcity too.