Following the official launch of AMD's Radeon RX 470 GPU, Sapphire has unleashed its own custom graphics card with the Nitro+ RX 470 in 4GB and 8GB factory overclocked versions. Surprisingly, the new cards are up for purchase now at various retailers at $210 for the 4GB model and $240 for the 8GB model (more on that in a bit).
The new Nitro+ RX 470 uses the same board and cooler design as the previously announced Nitro+ RX 480 which is a good thing both for Sapphire (less R&D cost) and for consumers as they get a rather beefy cooler that should allow them to push the RX 470 clocks quite a bit. The card uses the same Dual X cooler with two 95mm quick connect fans, three nickel plated copper heatpipes, and an aluminum fin stack. The card features the same black fan shroud and black and silver colored backplate. Out of the box this cooler should keep the RX 470 GPU running cooler and quieter than the RX 480, but it should also enable users to get higher clocks out of the smaller GPU (less cores means less heat and more overclocking headroom assuming you get a good chip from the silicon lottery).
Sapphire is using Black Diamond 4 chokes and a 4+1 power phase design that is driven by a single 8-pin PCI-E power connector (and up to 75W from the motherboard slot). This mirrors the design of its RX 480 sibling.
Display outputs include a single DVI, two HDMI 2.0b, and two DisplayPort 1.4 ports.
The chart below outlines the comparison between the Nitro+ RX 470 cards, RX 470 reference specifications, and the RX 480.
Nitro+ RX 470 4GB |
Nitro+ RX 470 8GB | RX 470 Reference | RX 480 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 | 2048 | 2304 |
Compute Units | 32 | 32 | 32 | 36 |
TMUs | 128 | 128 | 128 | 144 |
ROPs | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
GPU Clock (Base) | 1143 MHz | 1121 MHz | 926 MHz | 1120 MHz |
GPU Clock (Boost) | 1260 MHz | 1260 MHz | 1206 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Memory | 4GB GDDR5 @ 7 GHz | 8GB GDDR5 @ 8 GHz | 4 or 8 GB GDDR5 @ 6.6 GHz | 4 or 8 GB GDDR5 @ up to 8 GHz |
Memory Bus | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s | 211 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
TDP | <225W | <225W | 120W | 150W |
GPU | Polaris 10 | Polaris 10 | Polaris 10 | Polaris 10 |
Price | $210 | $240 | $180+ | $200+ ($240+ for 8GB) |
The RX 470 GPU is only slightly cut down from RX 480 in that it features four fewer CUs though the processor maintains the same number of ROP units and the same 256-bit memory bus. Reference clocks are 926 MHz base and 1206 MHz boost. Memory can be up to 8GB of GDDR5 with reference memory clocks of 6.6 GHz (effective). Sapphire has overclocked both the GPU and memory with the NItro+ series. The Nitro+ RX 470 with 4GB of GDDR5 is clocked at 1143 MHz base, 1260 MHz boost, and 7 GHz memory while the 8GB version has a lower base clock of 1121 but a higher memory clock of 8 GHz.
The 8GB model having a lower base overclock is a bit strange to me, but at least they are rated at the same boost clock. These specifications are very close to the RX 480 actually and with a bit of user overclocking beyond the factory overclock you could get even closer to the performance of it.
The problem with this RX 470 that gets so close to the RX 480 though is that the price is also very close to reference RX 480s! The Sapphire Nitro+ RX 470 4GB is priced at $209.99 while the Nitro+ RX 470 8GB is $239.99.
These prices put the card well into RX 480 territory though not quite up to the MSRPs of factory overclocked RX 480s (e.g. Sapphire's own Nitro+ RX 480 is $219 and $269 for 4GB and 8GB respectively). The company has a nice looking (and hopefully performing) RX 470, but it is going to be tough to choose this card over a RX 480 that has more shaders and TMUs. One advantage though is that this is a card that will just work without having to manually overclock (though where is the fun in that? heh) and it is actually available right now unlike the slew of RX 480 cards that have been launched but are consistently out of stock everywhere! If you simply can't wait for a RX 480, this might not be a bad option.
EDIT: Of course the 8GB model goes out of stock at Newegg as I write this and Amazon's prices are higher than MSRP! hah.
Prices are not what they
Prices are not what they should be. I almost wish for a 3GB GTX 1060, so AIBs come to there senses. On the other hand in 1-2 weeks time we will have the second wave of RX 480 cards in the market considering the information that AMD will send over 100K GPUs to it’s partners. So when those RX 480’s come out, RX 470’s might see a price drop.
The situation now is more or less
480 reference
or
470 custom
at the same price.
470’s, even the customs, should cost $10-$20 less than reference RX480’s with the same amount of memory.
The MSI Radeon RX 470 GAMING
The MSI Radeon RX 470 GAMING X 8G TWIN FROZR with the 8-pin power connector when its price comes down to at least $35 dollars below any 8Gb version of the RX 480 is what I’ll be looking at. I’d rather have an 8 pin plug on any Polaris 10 based SKU and most of the power coming run through the 8 pin and the least amount coming from the PCI traces.
If they have enough wafer runs to make 100K RX 480s GPUs for sure there will be some Polaris 10 dies with defects that will be binned for even more RX 470s. So once the initial new card demand is satisfied and the retail outlets start having excess stock and the pricing will become much better. But if the RX 470 pricing does not get down to at least $35 dollars below the RX 480 then the 470 is not going to be as attractive of a deal.
The big question is what will the miners demand do to the Polaris 10 based SKUs pricing before the time when everybody that wants a Polaris 10 based SKU can readily get one at a sale price.
I really don’t know. Are
I really don’t know. Are there still so many miners? I hope not for sure.
Don’t need many when they buy
Don’t need many when they buy cards by the dozen.
And yes both the 480 & 470 are VERY attractive to miners.
No one has GPU mined for the
No one has GPU mined for the past 2 years
“I almost wish for a 3GB GTX
“I almost wish for a 3GB GTX 1060,”
Why John? In directx 12 the 470 is excellent and the custom msi gaming X, saphire nitro +, powercoler red devil, to name a few (not the asus strix crap) seem worth $200.
Given the beefed up hardware such as improved pcb’s and cooling solutions, not to mention the cool backplates (probably useless but cool), I can see getting one of these for $200 over a reference rx 480 for the same price. I think 4GB of memory should be more than enough for 1080p, which this card is perfect for.
You can’t put the same price
You can’t put the same price tag that you have on a 480, on a 470. You can’t sell a 470 at higher prices than a 480. AMD’s PCB wasn’t something cheap and the cooling solution probably costs $1-$2 less than those custom ones. Not to mention that those custom ones are NOT new designs but old designs that are just used again on a new GPU.
So, a GTX 1060 with 3GB at $199-$219 could send the RX 470 closer to where it should have been in the first place. $179 max for the 4GB, $219 max for the 8GB.
Didn’t get your point in your
Didn’t get your point in your first post. I thought you wanted one so you could buy it, not so it would correct the 470 pricing. Whatever it takes to sell a shitload and keep the company and the stock price on an upward trajectory. And we still have the high end to look forward to.
Of course I want AMD to sell.
Of course I want AMD to sell. I am not exactly someone with an Nvidia logo, am I? :p
But my comments are always from the consumer perspective. And from a consumer’s perspective I would prefer pricing to be better from the first day, not to have to wait for Nvidia to respond. But we can’t have everything, can we? 😀
PS A 3GB GTX 1060 is a bad idea except if it is a temporary solution for 6-12 months.
I thought you have been going
I thought you have been going overboard lately trying to seem objective in the face of the shit you get from the Nvidia boy running the shop and his pal, so I thought you were doing the same. Glad I was so mistaken.
If I cared for anyone’s
If I cared for anyone’s opinion about me, the first thing I would do, would be to remove my avatar. If that ends up not enough, I could just start posting as an anonymous user.
I always try to be objective, post as a customer, not as a fanboy. The fact that as a customer I don’t approve monopolistic tactics, makes me look as what my avatar describes me, an AMD fanboy. Well if Nvidia changes the ways it does business, I could become it’s bigger fan.
Also Nvidia fanboys will never quote me if they agree with my post. They will quote me only when they have objections. And that will lead to more posts, more posts with an AMD Sempron logo on the left and the typical easy conclusion “Oh look, that AMD fanboy again spamming the comments section”. Nothing strange here. Just superficial thinking from others. They see my avatar and they put their brain in hibernation.
sapphire has a AIB RX 480 out
sapphire has a AIB RX 480 out now…its on newegg, and its selling out as fast as they can stock them.
deleted duplicate
deleted duplicate
Hopefully now that they have
Hopefully now that they have fully released this low end stack of cards they will bless the rest of us with the rx 490, even if it’s a dual chip part. At this rate Nvidia will release volta before we see the rx 490.
Nvidia can release Volta but
Nvidia can release Volta but the big money is in the mainstream SKUs like the RX 480/470/GTX 1060 as that’s where the money will be going. There is also the big multi-GPU adaptor ability in the new graphics APIs that once the gaming/gaming engine makers start tapping into will make for some better dual or more GPU scaling abilities and some folks going with 2 or 3 RX 480s, RX 470s, or even GTX 1060s.
So with the games/gaming engines able to manage their own GPUs via Vulkan or DX12 independently of any SLI/CF then things are going to get even more interesting for dual, or more, GPU usage. For certain the games/gaming engine makers are going to tap into that new graphics API based multi-GPU adaptor technology to try to best each others ability to make use of the Vulkan/DX12 intrinsic multi-GPU adaptor features. Let the multi-GPU adaptor arms race begin!
Excellent point. These 470’s
Excellent point. These 470’s and 480’s keep looking better and better.
There has been zero
There has been zero indication that developers will actually spend any time actually implementing multi-GPU support in games. You can hope all you want, just don’t be disappointed when it never happens.
Historically DICE has had the best SLI/Xfire scaling with their Frostbite engine, so that might continue. As it stands right now, Epic has no plans to implement multi-GPU support into Unreal Engine 4 in any capacity. If Epic isn’t going to implement it into the engine themselves there should be no expectation for individual devs licensing UE4 to implement it themselves.
SLI and CF both will be
SLI and CF both will be replaced by Graphics API managed Multi-GPU and Nvidia and AMD can not do too much about that. Both Vulkan and DX12 will support multi-GPU and give games developers control over any and all GPUs plugged into a PC/Laptop, if you do not think games makers will make use of all of Vulkan’s and DX12’s Multi-GPU adaptor abilities you are truly clueless. Games developers will do much more for Multi-GPU scaling and that includes all the non Apple OS ecosystems developers for PCs/Laptops. SLI/CF are not very good and are only supported by their respective GPU makers limited budgets, but Multi-adaptor via the APIs will allow anyone the ability to develop their own GPU scaling in the games/gaming engines, and other non gaming graphics software. There will be gaming engine makers competing with each other to get the best Multi-GPU performance in order to get their gaming engine packages in more games. Games will be able to make use of weaker integrated graphics for non graphics compute to give the new games even more realistic effects. And both Vulkan and DX12 will allow for all GPUs to be made available for graphics and compute in an easy to access manner via the graphics APIs!
It still comes down to how
It still comes down to how easy it will be to implement multi-GPU in their games. There will be a few studios that are willing to spend the time on engine optimizations and multi-GPU may be a part of that. But most game developers aren’t creating their own engines, or doing major customization to existing engines.
I would love to see multi-GPU setups actually become useful as it would be great for the end-user. But, I just don’t have confidence in most game developers to spend time and resources on a feature that will only effect 1-2% of their users.
Its a situation of game devs not wasting time on a market that doesn’t exist. But, the market doesn’t exist because developers haven’t spent the time to make it worthwhile.
The games industry has the
The games industry has the money and there will be gaming engine and middleware makers developing industry wide software to make it easy for games developers, and most gaming companies have the money to hire the PHDs. There will be research institutions developing GPU load balancing algorithms usnig the DX12/Vulkan APIs and there are already some games beginning to make use of Multi-GPU in Vulkan and DX12, as with any technology out of the control of the GPU makers hands, having that Vulkan/DX12 Multi-GPU will get the majority of support from the games makers as the games makers will not be dependent on the GPU makers for any CF/SLI usage.
The GPU driver model under DX12 and Vulkan is much simpler and the gaming industry has the funds to pay for the development using this new graphs API functionality! Valve will be using it for its games and its VR games and the entire VR industry with backers like Oculus, HTC/others will be all over Multi-GPU via Vulkan/DX12! The money is definitely there for the development of Multi-GPU via Vulkan/DX12, more money than Nvidia or AMD could afford to spend on their crappy SLI/CF attempts.
It’s not a feature that will affect 1% it is a feature that will affect 100% as everybod gets into the development for Vulkan and DX12, just wait one year’s time and see! I’ll even bet that 100% of the GTX 1060 users will be gladly using Vulkan/DX12 multi-GPU adaptor and Nvidia will not be able to stop that.
This is a headscratcher.
This is a headscratcher.
AMD should have anticipated the last generation cards would crowd the $150-$200 price range, so why would they complicate the situation by cramming two GPUs so close together that they are literally leap-frogging prices?
Now, instead of capturing two different segments (the $150 price point and the $200 price point), the 470 & 480 are going head-to-head against each other.
The more the merrier, I’d buy
The more the merrier, I’d buy either at this point. Just want to be able to buy one (or 2 really)!
The RX 470 is AMD making its
The RX 470 is AMD making its best with whatever RX 480 yield issues it has, and at least AMD has not chosen to fuse off as much functional units as Nvidia does in Nvidia’s premeditated fashion to assure absolute product segmentation. So AMD in its need to move as many Polaris 10 based SKUs(RX 480s/470s) has nicely made the RX 470’s performance metrics very close to the RX 480’s performance metrics.
There always has been on AMD’s part the willingness to give the second most powerful GPU(RX 470) in performance in a particular market class almost as much performance as the top GPU in its market class(RX 480). So for AMD’s RX 470 there is much more value to be had from a graphics and compute standpoint relative to Nvidia. The RX 470 once the initial RX 480 market demand has been serviced will probably be offered at very near to $150 on sale in the not to distant future. For AMD getting that market share, and the increased revenues that go with more market share, is of primary importance. So AMD is trying its best to make both the RX 480 and the RX 470 obtain more of that all important mainstream market share. There will be some great deals once the new GPU pent up demand is satiated.
I thought the rx 470 was
I thought the rx 470 was supposed to be the magic 2.8x the performance per watt champ compared to AMDs old arch. Look at that wattage on Nitro less than 225. It eats Titanx power but can’t even give you Rx 480 performance. I wouldn’t buy that for a dollar. LOL
Agreed, same. GTX 1060 all
Agreed, same. GTX 1060 all the way for my midrange build all day
So what? You don’t need a
So what? You don’t need a graphics card, anyway. You don’t play games, all you do is spam PCPer with your fanboy garbage, you can even do that on an Intel iGPU.
For your misinformation, I do
For your misinformation, I do game. Plenty. I have a 4 gig dual bios ftw evga 760. I’m waiting to upgrade. Maybe when Vega or Ti pops up it will make 1080 or 1070 cheaper. Or if the performance is that much greater maybe I’ll get that. Or if Volta is really around the corner. I’ll wait. I’m not at all interested in dx 12 unless Micros*it ports it to 8.1. I like my dx11 just fine thank you. Care even less for async which chews up wattage for maybe what 12% gain in Timespy no less.
There are too many AMD fanboys spreading their garbage here. I like the challenge. What are you spamming yours on, probably a 10 year old Radeon that performs just as good as the day you bought it.
I buy Nvidia because it’s the best. Don’t need to be a fanboy to know that.
Really? You still have a GTX
Really? You still have a GTX 760?
Oh, you poor bastard.
I also had an EVGA GTX 760 and man that card was awful.
Now some years later the R7 370, a card that can be had for $89 (a rebrand of a reband of a reband as well), is beating the GTX 760 consistently.
I feel nothing but disdain and buyers remorse for ever getting that GPU and it’s hard for me to wrap my head around how anyone could enjoy that GPU when the AMD counterpart during it’s revelancy is so far ahead of the GTX 760 in performance.
Personally upgraded to a 290X (and now Fury X) and have not looked back.
I agree that Polaris is a let down. It’s relatively power hungry and it had a poor launch but that didn’t stop it from moving tens of thousands of units.
370 is one gen newer than my
370 is one gen newer than my Kepler and 2 years newer as well. Don’t feel sorry about my 760’s performance it has 86% ASIC. And according to game debate the 370 is 31% worse than my card at stock clocks.
http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=3068&gid2=1845&compare=radeon-r7-370-vs-geforce-gtx-760-evga-dual-4gb-ftw-w-acx-edition#
I’d be interested to see the links where 370 consistently beats a 760. Maybe at dx12/Vulkan which my card was not really designed for. My performance is only 10-15% better than stock 760.
I feel sorry for someone who has to make stuff up. I also feel sorry for anyone that buys a Polaris 460 as my 3 year old card still beats it and it’s 2 gens older LOL.
Come on, man. Don’t do
Come on, man. Don’t do this.
The R7 370 really is a reband of a reband of a reband.
The R7 370 is rebanded R9 270, and the R9 270 is rebranded Radeon HD 7870 that released in 2012, man.
Check TechPowerUp charts, because in every single chart the R7 370 is faster than the GTX 760 – and on the newer charts (like the RX 470 review) the GTX 760 has been bumped off the GPU charts entirely because it’s performance was so poor.
Bottom tier GPU is now the R7 370.
I’m not a fanboy, but don’t delude yourself man. The GTX 760 is a shit card through and through, there’s no amount of buyers remorse or delusion that can change that.
I own(ed) the card as well for a long time, I have pictures of my old rig with the EVGA GTX 760 2GB.
You where lost in
You where lost in rebrands.
R7 370 is a rebrand or R9 265 which is a rebrand of HD 7850.
Unfortunately AMD likes shooting itself in the foot, and then in the face, just to be sure for the results.
So R7 370 comes with less stream processors than R9 270. Nice isn’t it?
This isn’t the first time they do this. In the past AMD have replaced the much better HD 7750(512 sps), with that pathetic R7 250(384sps), and the 7730(384 sps) with the R7 240(320 sps).
And even in the CPU market Sempron has turn from a superior option to the Celeron, to a joke. And that happened before the Bulldozer disaster.
Even Nvidia does stupid tricks with rebranding. The three different versions of GT 730 is a proof of that. Two versions with Kepler, one with Fermi GPU. Bandwidths from 14GB/sec to 40GB/sec. You can easily buy a GT 730 that is 2-3 times slower than another GT 730.
I think only Intel doesn’t try to trick it’s consumers with stupid rebrands but I could be wrong because I don’t spend much time looking at Intel’s products.
Even Intel releases refreshes
Even Intel releases refreshes of their chips. You get a small bump in performance usually. New features or instruction sets are added but nnothing worth buying a new CPU for.
Oh, wow. So then then my GTX
Oh, wow. So then then my GTX 760 is not only getting beat by an R9 270, but an R9 265?
And wasn’t the 270X the original GTX 760 competitor? And now the R9 265 is handily beating it?
Wow. I had no idea my kepler GPU aged that poorly.
Thank you for clearing that up for me, I do find myself getting lost in the sea of 28nm rebrands unfortunately.
Maybe your 2 gig version
Maybe your 2 gig version wasn’t very good. Mine boosts up to 1300 mhz without me overclocking it. I play max details 1920 by 1080 all day on games that were in the same time period of my card. In fact I’m playing Evolve at med-high details 1440p. I even get good fps at 4k on older games like Skyrim. Try that on a 2 gig 370.
Of course a two year newer card is better suited in new games than the stock 760. I checked charts even on new stuff the stock 760 was within a few frames at best. So quit deluding yourself that it destroys the 760. Put some tesselation in a game and the 370 chokes on it.
Even in 3dmark a Strix 370 doesn’t beat a stock 760.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/asus-radeon-r7-370-strix-review,18.html
Don’t do what publish facts. I don’t regret purchasing this card one bit. It was price/performance leader of time.
I bet you regret your crap performance in VR with your weak Furyx. On par with moderate Rx 480 and gets beat by a 1060.
Keep in mind that the actual
Keep in mind that the actual GTX 760 competitor was the R9 280 which absolutely destroys the GTX 760 – I was originally saying that the R7 370, a small GPU from 2012 (the GPU the R7 370 is based on) is now beating the GTX 760, a card I bought for $300+ in 2013.
And you can’t deny that, can you? That the GTX 760 is destroyed by the R9 280? I mean, you can say that the GTX 760 trades blows with the R7 370, but is that really something to be boastful about? It’s beating a GPU from 2012 that is several tiers below it’s actual competition?
And why the bashing on my Fury X? I don’t understand.
My reasoning for buying a Fury X over a 980 Ti, full knowing that in most scenarios the 980 Ti is better is because GCN GPUs age better and I don’t upgrade annually.
I just don’t understand why you feel the need to shill for any company, unless you get paid per post or something.
It’s obvious that Nvidia
It’s obvious that Nvidia doesn’t care much about Kepler anymore. So no more optimization for it.
Might be based on but new card has new optimizations/features so can’t consider inception date two years newer tech is the same regardless.
If destroyed is 5%-10% then I guess a stock 760 gets destroyed by 280.
Maybe you have “buyers remorse” over spending $650 for Furyx. It isn’t very future proof with only 4 gigs of ram in an 8 gig world. Not to mention each game has to be optimized on a per game basis for it for the HBM memory. Once HBM2 drops I wouldn’t be surprised if optimizations for Fury line slow down. AMD does it too like the 6000 series got shat on when 7000 series GCN dropped.
Obviously I don’t upgrade annually either. The 760 replaced a 460. I tend to go three generations if possible before upgrading. Soon as game performance isn’t there it’s time to upgrade.
I got a 9300 on 3dmark 11 with my card. A 280 gets 9770. Wow a whopping 5% better than my card. I don’t know how I’ll live with it being destroyed.
I could bring out a whole bunch of older AMD cards that get wrecked by the 1060. So if you keep bringing up lesser tier new card beating older higher tier card I will.
I don’t shill for anyone I know you more likely do as this isn’t the only site you frequent.
With all those “MSRP” and out
With all those “MSRP” and out of stock stories, I’m starting to feel very lucky that I was able to get a 4GB RX480 for $199 on amazon.
(I didn’t check if it was a 8GB)
Also, the RX-480 undervolt very well, and its amazing to me that I sustain ~1.2ghz in furmark. (And the fan is at 2800 rpm max)
I also stay at 100% “Boost” clock in timespy and all other benchmarks.
And if I set the clock the 1.2ghz, I can drop max voltage to .930v
Its like a 5% drop in performance, but 100% sustained performance.
And the fan is quiet (and zero heat put inside the case)
I dont have the equipment to check, but I bet the card at 1.2ghz .930v is well below 150w.
I sound like a salesman, but this card is the best GPU value I ever got for $199.
My XFX reference RX480 can
My XFX reference RX480 can hold 1350 with 2250 on the memory all day with the power limit maxed and the fan set to 3400, which in my case under my desk is barely audible.
You might already do it. But
You might already do it. But if you overclock the VRAM make 100% sure you manually set the voltage.
If you dont wattman (set on auto), will “overvolt” the ram to some insane levels. It actually affected my furmak sustain clock
I had something like 120fps with the ram at 1.75ghz, and around 85fps with the ram at 2ghz. Even with the power lmit maxed.
But I was back at 120+fps if I had the ram voltage set to 1v.
note: I could go to 2.1ghz at 1v (the 4GB model default at 1750mhz)
The ram didn’t undervolt well for me. 1000mv seem to be the sweet spot.
BTW, this is what make the 4GB vs 8GB review benchmark differ.
From what I can see, the 8GB model doesn’t get its advantage from the amount of memory, but its higher default clock.
Fucking awesome to hear.
Fucking awesome to hear. Thanks for the update. I wonder how two of these running on a game with direct x or vulcan multidisplay tech would do against the high end stuff?
Why are they even shipping RX
Why are they even shipping RX 470s with 8GB of vram? The 8GB of vram on the RX 480 isn’t worth the price delta over the 4GB, and there is no fucking way it is worth paying more money for any RX 470 vs a reference RX 480.
If you are doing any Blender
If you are doing any Blender 3d rendering the more VRAM the better for high definition textures, so it’s not all about FPS and gaming for AMD’s GPUs. I think that GPU development needs to be taken back from the gaming only mindset and Nvidia before the full all around usefulness is gimped out of all consumer GPUs. AMD’s consumer GPUs have always been good for more all around graphics/compute uses without the end users having to purchase the wallet crushing pro GPU SKUs. I’ll gladly take 2 RX 470s with 8 gigs of VRAM each for plenty of ultra high definition scene rendering without the VRAM running out.
I have a framed photo of Linus Torvalds shooting Nvidia the bird proudly displayed on the wall right above my computer! Say No to the gimping of all around consumer GPU usefulness by Nvidia and its Green Goblins!
P.S. Multi-adaptor GPU managed by the Graphics APIs is going to put a stop to Nvidia Gimping its own GTX 1060 SKU of SLI support, so even Nvidia’s GTX 1060 users will not be victimized by lack of SLI support, and they will not have to purchase any overpriced bridge to do so!
I am in a mini panic, several
I am in a mini panic, several flesh humans that I interact with in the real world have ask me for months “When do I upgrade my Gpu” and most of them, (18/20) i told them to wait till aug 9. Then the 470 launched higher than expected…… so I duno