[H]ard|OCP followed up their series on replacing the TIM underneath the heatspreader on Kaby Lake processors with another series depicting the i5-7600K in the buff. They removed the heatspreader completely and tried watercooling the die directly. As you can see in the video this requires more work than you might immediately assume, it was not simply shimming which was involved, some of the socket on the motherboard needed to be trimmed with a knife in order to get the waterblock to sit directly on the core. In the end the results were somewhat depressing, the risks involved are high and the benefits almost non-existent. If you are willing to risk it, replacing the TIM and reattaching the heatspreader is a far better choice.
"After our recent experiments with delidding and relidding our 7700K and 7600K to see if we could get better operating temperatures, we decided it was time to go topless! Popping the top on your CPU is one thing, and getting it to work in the current processor socket is another. Get out your pocket knife, we are going to have to make some cuts."
Here are some more Processor articles from around the web:
- Intel Celeron G3930 On Linux: A Dual-Core Kabylake CPU For $40 @ Phoronix
- Intel Pentium G4600: A Surprising 3.6GHz Kabylake CPU For $90 @ Phoronix
This is pretty useless. Intel
This is pretty useless. Intel said they will be coming out with the i7 7740k and the i5 7640k with HT to help compete with Rysen.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-reacts-to-ryzen-with-new-kaby-lake-core-i5-7640k-and-i7-7740k-processors.html
Wow. I didn’t realize the guy
Wow. I didn’t realize the guy from HardOCP was so dumb. He’s crossing his fingers and saying “come on come on come on” while poking around with the chip like it’s an old hot rod. Dude piles blue painter’s tape under the heatsink as a spacer. I bet he doesn’t even know or care that the gallium in the TIM he used reacts poorly with the aluminum in the base of some coolers. It really only takes having a url and emailing some manufacturers for samples to fool anyone into thinking you are a tech reviewer who knows anything about how computers work.
Risking destruction of the
Risking destruction of the CPU so it lasts a bit longer? How much longer CPU lasts when it runs cool anyway?