Performance Focus – ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB
I'm sticking with the 'burst vs. saturated' plots here, as they do well to show both sustained performance and the more realistic (for client PC usage) burst throughputs.
Sequential
Random
Burst and sustained reads for both sequential and random are overlapping in the above two charts, which is expected. For writes, we see the story change, as the SLC cache is exhausted during a saturated/sustained write operation, resulting in lower results there (blue line vs. grey line).
Burst Random %Read Sweep
No surprises here. Scaling is as expected for NAND flash and we see no oddities at mixed workloads of varying percentiles.
Caching
While caching performance was decent, with the SX8200 doing its best to ensure there was always *some* SLC cache available for the next write, we did note it to be rather inconsistent. One run in the middle of the write series managed to go a full 80GB at SLC speeds, while others began writing direct-to-TLC after only a few seconds / ~7GB written. That said, the write starts were always SLC speed, which is the most important factor here.
not sure why this got an
not sure why this got an award? i would rather get the WD 512gb for $9 more. im not a fan of the Samsung hype either.
The WD is running the same
The WD is running the same price as the equivalent Samsung, which both run $30 higher than this was at the time of posting. Be sure to check Newegg prices since it seems to run lower there for the ADATA products.
Please review the ex920!
Please review the ex920!
Very good review. Like
Very good review. Like always.
At that cost, would be an impressive cache drive for a NAS behind a 10Gbit Nic. Will definitely keep this on top of the list for next build. (unless WD or Samsung respond by dropping their prices)