Performance Comparisons – TRIM Speed
Thanks to the plethora of data we have at our disposal from the new suite, I can derive some additional interesting data that nobody seems to have been paying any attention to yet. Have you ever deleted a large file and then noticed your system seem to hang for some time afterward? Maybe file moves from your SSD seemed to take longer than expected?
That's your problem right there. In the above capture, a 16GB file was deleted while a minimal level of background IO was taking place. Note how that IO completely stalls for a few seconds shortly after the file was deleted? That's a bad thing. We don't want that, but to fix it, someone needs to measure it and point it out. Enter another aspect of our testing:
Latency Percentile data was obtained while running a 'light' (1000 IOPS) workload in the background while files of varying sizes were deleted. The amount of latency added during the deletions was measured, compared with a baseline, and correlated with the sizes of the deleted files. The result is how much latency is added to the active workload per GB of file size that was deleted. In short, this is how long you may notice a stutter last after deleting a 1GB file.
To avoid confusion, I've maintained the performance-based sort from the mixed test for these charts. Here you can tell that some drives that did perform well on that test stick out a bit here when it comes to how they handle TRIM. Ideally, these results should all be as close to 0.000 as possible. Higher figures translate to longer performance dips after files have been moved or deleted.
Generally, Samsung and a few others do great in these TRIM tests. The SX8200 is not at zero here, but it is low enough that I would not consider it a concern.
This is another result from a different set of data. While our suite runs, it issues a full drive TRIM several times. Some of those times it is done on an empty SSD, others it is done on a full SSD. Any difference in time taken is measured and calculated, normalizing to a response time per GB TRIMmed. In short, this is how long an otherwise idle SSD would hang upon receiving a TRIM command for a 1GB file. These times are shorter than the last chart because the SSD controller does not have to juggle this TRIM with background activity and can throw all of its resources at the request.
Similar results for the full partition TRIM test, but this time the SX8200 does manage to hit zero. Most SSDs did well in both tests. The only SSD I would consider entering 'noticeable' territory is the Plextor M8Pe.
not sure why this got an
not sure why this got an award? i would rather get the WD 512gb for $9 more. im not a fan of the Samsung hype either.
The WD is running the same
The WD is running the same price as the equivalent Samsung, which both run $30 higher than this was at the time of posting. Be sure to check Newegg prices since it seems to run lower there for the ADATA products.
Please review the ex920!
Please review the ex920!
Very good review. Like
Very good review. Like always.
At that cost, would be an impressive cache drive for a NAS behind a 10Gbit Nic. Will definitely keep this on top of the list for next build. (unless WD or Samsung respond by dropping their prices)