4K TV's aren't just for those couple of Netflix shows or YouTube videos you use to show off to your friends, they are also a viable replacement for a monitor. If you pick the right one you not only get 4K resolutions but also HDR and after investing that much dosh you might not be looking at upgrading your PC's monitor any time soon. Drop by TechSpot for a look at three TV's they recommend, ranging from a mere $630 up to $2100, with a few honourable mentions as well.
Perhaps you have some suggestions of your own to offer in the comments.
"If you're interested in replacing your desktop monitor with a 4K TV and want to know what to buy, you've come to the right place. Maybe you aren't quite sure where to start or could use a hand in narrowing your search. Whatever the case, this guide is intended to help steer you in the right direction"
Here are some more Display articles from around the web:
- MSI Optix MAG27CQ & MSI Optix MPG27CQ 1440p 144Hz Gaming Monitors @ TechSpot
- AOC I1601FWUX Portable 16in USB-C monitor @ Kitguru
- Philips Momentum 43 4K HDR Monitor @ Techspot
- The Best Gaming Monitors @ TechSpot
- BenQ TK800 4K HDR Projector @ TechARP
Frustratingly low-quality
Frustratingly low-quality article from Tech Spot. No mention of what constitutes “low response times”, no adaptive sync, and nothing with refresh rates above 60hz.
Anyone have a better recommendation or article? The Nvidia BFGDs were still in the realm of expensive fantasies last I checked.
If you want accurate latency
If you want accurate latency measurements for each TV, check out rtings.com. They have reviews for a large number of TVs and latency measurements is one of the main categories they test for along with color accuracy and enhancements.
Samsung Q6FN at 55″ or bigger
Samsung Q6FN at 55″ or bigger is adaptive sync 20-120Hz at 1080p or 48-60Hz at 4K. The latter might not be viable option till AMD releases something more capable than Vega 64.