Samsung 9100 PRO PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review

Samsung returns to form
The first Gen5 SSD from Samsung has arrived, with the 9100 PRO offering performance that could just make it the fastest available NVMe drive. And by fastest, we mean an advertised up to 14,800 MB/s in peak sequential reads (if you get the 4TB model), with an impressive 13,400 MB/s sequential write capability.
“The 9100 PRO SSD boasts lightning-fast PCIe 5.0, enabling the drive to achieve up to 14,800/13,400 MB/s sequential read/write speeds – moving data twice as fast as the previous generation. Plus, with random read/write speeds of up to 2,200K/2,600K IOPS, you can tackle massive files or access your favorite games and apps faster than ever before.”
Of course, straight line speeds – aided by the latest generation of motherboard PCI-E M.2 connectivity – aren’t everything, and while the new 9100 PRO may offer 2x faster sequential speeds, there may be some impressive random performance as well (but we need to see some benchmark results).
Before moving on, this wouldn’t be a storage review without (Allyn?) a look at some specs, so here those are:
Samsung is using an in-house controller for the new 9100 PRO series, and with its 5nm process the power consumption numbers look pretty good for a Gen5 SSD with this level of performance. Our 2TB sample is rated for power consumption of up to 8.1W read/7.9W write. This compares very favorably to the Crucial T705 (which makes use of a Phison PS5026-E26 (PDF) controller) with its 11.5W max power consumption – though it is the fastest Gen5 drive we have tested to date.
Now, on to the testing.
Benchmark Results
Using the same system that has become the defacto GPU testbed around here – namely a Ryzen 7 9800X3D powered system on AMD’s X870E platform, I set to work testing the new 9100 PRO, along with the previous-gen 990 PRO and Crucial’s T705. All were 2TB capacity models. A full rundown of the test platform is in the table below.
PC Perspective Test Platform | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (Stock) | |||||||
Motherboard | ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR X870E HERO BIOS 1104 AGESA 1.2.0.3a Patch A Resizable BAR Enabled |
|||||||
Memory | 32GB (16GBx2) G.Skill Trident Z NEO @ DDR5-6000 CL28 | |||||||
OS Storage Drive | Samsung 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD | |||||||
Power Supply | be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W | |||||||
Operating System | Windows 11 Pro, 24H2 | |||||||
Drivers | X870E Platform: AMD Chipset Driver 7.02.13.148 GPU: GeForce Game Ready Driver 566.36 |
First, here is a comparison of a default CrystalDiskMark run with an empty drive (left), and then after the drive was filled to approximately 50% capacity (right):
We were definitely able to achieve the advertised 14,700 MB/s read, 13,400 MB/s write speeds for our 2TB model (remember, only the 4TB and above can reach 14,800 MB/s), and some of the numbers actually seemed to improve with the drive conditioned to 50% capacity (though run-to-run variance is likely the culprit).
Next we will get into more controlled testing with the 9100 PRO, we we break down performance into the sequential and random 4K categories, and at four queue depths. First, a look at sequential read and write performance at QD1, QD2, QD4, and QD8 (all single-thread):
We looked first as sequential reads and while the new 9100 PRO falls behind the T705 at QD1, it overtakes the E26-powered drive at QD2 and builds its lead from there. Also, it is quite evident that Samsung’s previous generation was being held back by the interface, as the 990 PRO begins to hit a wall at QD2. The marketing claim of 2x previous gen performance is accurate, as we are seeing about a 97% improvement in sequential read speeds when comparing the 9100 PRO t0 the 990 PRO.
In the sequential write tests the 9100 PRO is effectively tied with the T705 at QD1, and is over 800 MB/s faster at QD2 and above. The 990 PRO is nearly half the speed of the new drive in sequential writes, with the 9100 PRO about 96% faster than the 990 PRO at its peak.
On to 4k random results:
While the 990 PRO came out slightly ahead in random 4k reads at QD1, the 9100 PRO is quite a bit faster in overall 4k random read performance, and also outclasses the Crucial T705 in this test.
The random 4k writes are a bit of a different story, with the T705 and older 990 PRO pretty evenly matched at all queue depths tested, and the 9100 PRO only catching up by QD8.
Let’s see how all of this translated into the more “real-world” scenario of PCMark’s full system drive benchmark:
This is a fantastic result for the new Samsung SSD. With an average bandwidth of 684 MB/s the 9100 PRO was over 100 MB/s faster than the T705, soundly beating Crucial’s drive in this crucial test. The 990 PRO has a respectable showing, and it more competitive with the T705 than I would have guessed in this test, but the 9100 PRO is just in another league here.
Final Thoughts
While this review is by no means as comprehensive as it could be if my name was Allyn Malventano, I still think it’s safe to say that Samsung has a winner on its hands with the 9100 PRO. Their in-house controller is very impressive compared to E26-based Crucial drive we tested, though there is room for some firmware tweaking to catch up in some QD1 workloads.
Bottom line, Samsung has released the fastest SSD we have ever tested, and if the fast sequential speeds weren’t enough to persuade you, that fantastic showing in PCMark certainly should.
As to pricing, here is the breakdown in USD:
- 1TB 9100 PRO SSD – $199.99
- 1TB 9100 PRO with Heatsink – $219.99
- 2TB 9100 PRO SSD – $299.99 (as tested)
- 2TB 100 PRO with Heatsink – $319.99
- 4TB 9100 PRO SSD – $549.99
- 4TB 9100 PRO with Heatsink – $569.99
Samsung states that the 8TB models will be available in the second half of 2025, and pricing has not been announced just yet.

Review Disclosures
This is what we consider the responsible disclosure of our review policies and procedures.
How Product Was Obtained
The product was provided by Samsung for the purpose of this review.
Company Involvement
Samsung had no control over the content of the review and was not consulted prior to publication.
PC Perspective Compensation
Neither PC Perspective nor any of its staff were paid or compensated in any way by Samsung for this review.
Advertising Disclosure
Samsung has not purchased advertising at PC Perspective during the past twelve months.
Affiliate Links
If this article contains affiliate links to online retailers, PC Perspective may receive compensation for purchases through those links.
Looks very good! 2 8gb drives in mirror for your VMs sound great.
Sequential recording – pulling the wool over your eyes. Random and real application and here we have a terribly poor performance.
The wall and the end. There is no point in overpaying for Samsung.
Random read was the best tested to date, thus the best PCMark 10 results to date.
I think the poster before your reply was making the point of who needs the extra speed AND is there value in paying for extra speed in real world computing or gaming. I mean – do the tests translate into real world increases in performance. Quite frankly, for day to day home or office tasks (i.e. e-mail, loading Office apps, web surfing (e.g. I have found little advantage of 1 Gbps vs. 100 Mbps on normal tasks other than uploading or downloading large files). So, how does this advantage on artificial tests (in this case Crystal Disk Mark) translate into real world performance in loading games, loading changing levels, etc. In general, it sure seems like the need for speed in the Gen 5×4 is not matching up to real world gains in performance.