The M365 Copilot Assitants, Zey Do Nothing
Many Liked It, But Didn’t Use It
The UK Government tested out the effectiveness of Microsoft’s AI powered M365 assistant, picking up 1,000 Copilot licenses to distribute to a selection of employees. The results are somewhat amusing, with 72% of those users stating they were satisfied or very satisfied in a survey at the end of the trial. The users seem to have mostly used Copilot in Word, Teams, and Outlook; summarizing and tweaking text being the most popular usage. However, the actual usage tells a different story as about 66% used M365 at least once a week, 30% used it at least once a day and the remainder even less. That averages out to 1.14 M365 Copilot actions taken per user per day,
At a cost running between £4.90 to £18.10 per user per month this is not a great deal, as that adds up to a big bill for very little usage. It’s nice to see that the users believe they liked M365 Copilot, but it’s hard to develop a fully fleshed opinion with this tiny amount of use. The results of the usage that did take place were mixed, Copilot enhanced emails were judged to be of higher quality than those which weren’t AI enhanced but that was the only positive benefit. PowerPoint slides were created more quickly with Copilot, but the quality was not good and required extra work to bring them up to an acceptable level of quality. Excel was slower and significantly more inaccurate than non-Copilot generated spreadsheets, which is certainly a problem!
GitHub users are not quite as conflicted, the second most popular discussion on GitHub is how to disable Copilot and as of yet no one, including Microsoft, have come up with a way to do so. They are up in arms over the fact they can’t stop Copilot from training itself on the code they create, even if it is under a license that should prevent it. The AI generated bug reports that are completely inaccurate are tying up huge amounts of their time and can’t be stopped, and the Copilot generated posts are referenced by Copilot to spread this false information across GitHub. As there is almost no way to tell that a comment was written by Copilot about a bug hallucinated by another Copilot post, actual information is being drowned in a sea of disinformation.
Yay Copilot.
Around two-thirds of the employees in the trial used M365 at least once a week, and 30 percent used it at least once a day – which doesn't sound like great value for money.
More Tech News From Around The Web
- Hackers hijack npm packages with 2 billion weekly downloads in supply chain attack @ Bleeping Computer
- Mathematicians Find GPT-5 Makes Critical Errors in Original Proof Generation @ Slashdot
- Critical, make-me-super-user SAP S/4HANA bug under active exploitation @ The Register
- Tiny Vinyl is a new pocketable record format for the Spotify age @ Ars Technica
- Enterprises sticking with Windows 10 could shell out billions for continued support @ The Register
- Broadband wireless gets even broader thanks to integrated transmitter @ Physics World
- Whistle-Blower Sues Meta Over Claims of WhatsApp Security Flaws @ Slashdot
- FCC plans to kill Wi-Fi on school buses, hotspots for library patrons @ The Register
- The Sixteen-Year Odyssey To Finally Emulate The Pioneer LaserActive Console @ Hackaday
- The New d-Matrix JetStream 400G Ethernet Card for Data Center Scale AI Inference @ ServeTheHome
- Caravan Salon 2025 Video Coverage @ Funky Home
- VTOMAN Jump 2200 SuperSafe LIFEBMS Power Station Review @ NikKTech
- AVM FRITZ!Box 5690 Pro WiFi 7 Router @ KitGuru



Jiminy-jillikers
“Around two-thirds of the employees in the trial used M365 at least once a week, and 30 percent used it at least once a day – which doesn’t sound like great value for money.” That’s like saying “up to 75% discount”. Means very little. “At least once a week” could be 1 time or 3 times or 5 times. “At least once a day” could be many times a day.
“1.14 M365 Copilot actions taken per user per day” is a little more meaningful. Considering that most users didn’t use it once a day, the 30% that did use it daily probably used it more than once. 30% is IMO a respectable perentage, and those people apparently found it useful.
It would have been interesting to see correlation between use and age (or other parameters).
They should have done demographics … but maybe that’s a bit to non-GDPR for this sample size?