AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review – Even Faster

Manufacturer: AMD AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review – Even Faster

Modest Gains, No Competition

Announced at CES 2026, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a minor improvement over the existing Ryzen 7 9800X3D, offering a modest 400 MHz increase in maximum boost frequency (5.6 GHz, up from 5.2 GHz with the 9800X3D). The base clock (4.7 GHz) is unchanged from the 9800X3D, and this is still an 8-core, 16-thread part with 96MB of 3D V-Cache.

This minor refresh is not as exciting as the mythical dual-X3D part we keep hearing about (YouTube link), but Intel doesn’t have anything competitive in this segment. Sure, the Core Ultra 9 285K is a capable product, but it doesn’t hold a candle to AMD’s Zen 5 X3D parts when it comes to 1080p gaming benchmarks like the ones presented in this review.

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 11

So, what happens when the best gets better? Well, it’s kind of like the rich getting richer. AMD already had the fastest gaming processor in the world, and now they have a faster version of it. And that’s pretty much it. Any charts in the review to follow will reveal better performance thanks to higher boost frequencies; all perfectly logical and predictable.

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D is joined by its predecessor and Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K as the best gaming CPUs in the world:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 12

Personally I would put the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ahead of Intel’s current flagship, but if they want to stick to current-gen then so will I. Also, a 3% delta compared to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is not going to make for very compelling benchmark charts.

The most controversial aspect of this new processor launch is AMD’s assertion that memory speed is not a meaningful part of gaming performance. We won’t get into memory scaling in this review, but AMD’s slide – indicating a less than 1% improvement from DDR5-4800 to DDR5-6000 – is provided below:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 13

Please leave your polite remarks about 1% lows in the comments section below.

Some Performance Results

Testing out the latest AMD CPU against its predecessor was a little tricky. Any variance in benchmark results could obscure the very minor uplift that a slight frequency bump can offer. Rest assured that the utmost care went into the results to follow (all results averaged from three separate runs, re-testing done to verify incongruous results), though the results are probably exactly what you expected based on the specs.

PC Perspective GPU Test Platform
Motherboards ROG CROSSHAIR X870E HERO (AGESA ComboAM5 PI 1.2.7.0)
MSI MPG Z890 CARBON WIFI (BIOS 7E17v1A90)
Memory 32GB (16GBx2) Crucial Pro @ DDR5-6000 CL36
Storage Solidigm P44 Pro 2TB NVMe SSD
Power Supply be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13
Operating System Windows 11 Pro, 24H2
Drivers GeForce Game Ready Driver 591.74

3DMark is first, and provides a look at how CPU performance scales within simulated gaming workloads:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 14

Ok, so there really wasn’t any meaningful scaling after averaging three separate benchmark runs with each test, and each CPU. Re-testing was performed, and the results were the same. I could have gone all the way back to Fire Strike to force some scaling on the chart, but that test is 13 years old at this point…

Moving on to the one game that everyone uses to show CPU scaling: Cyberpunk 2077! Running the latest version (2.31a) we see that the 9850X3D provides a legitimate boost – even at 1080/Ultra:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 15

Cyberpunk continues to be a reliable test of CPU scaling at settings someone out there might actually use (our apologies to those with an RTX 5090 playing at 1080/low).

Next, a couple of very different game benchmarks, just to see if scaling between the 9800X3D and 9850X3D continues:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 16
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 17

The Talos Principle 2 was nearly a tie, being more GPU-bound, but there were some slight improvements in Age of Mythology Retold – though nothing significant enough to warrant an upgrade if you are already a 9800X3D owner. Oh, and the Core Ultra is…also a processor that can be used for gaming.

Next up, CPU benchmarks! Yes, processors can actually do more than offer different levels of performance with a given graphics card. Here are a couple of CPU benchmark results:

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 18
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 19

Yes, performance scales with clock speeds with a given architecture. These results also help illustrate that if compute performance is desired as much as, or more than, gaming performance, then the Core Ultra tested here – or a Ryzen 9 – would be a better option.

Final Thoughts

If you are lucky enough to be gaming on the AM5 platform, with the ability to afford DDR5 memory and a fast enough GPU to justify the highest level of CPU performance on the market, then this new Ryzen 7 9850X3D is for you. Well, unless you already have a Ryzen 7 9800X3D. But even if you do have that previous flagship, will you really ever be satisfied knowing that it’s only the second-fastest gaming CPU now? Exactly.

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Review - Even Faster - Processors 20

In all seriousness, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D will probably serve as a solid, drop-in replacement for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, as it makes no sense to offer both at similar price points. With a list price of $499 USD, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D will initially cost just $20 above the $479 USD launch price of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Naturally, the 9800X3D has generally been available at a discount, but as of this writing the deals are not as plentiful with the 9800X3D back up to $469 on Amazon and out of stock on Newegg. Could the 9800X3D go EOL? Only time will tell.

In any case, just for being the fastest gaming CPU in the world, and only commanding a $20 premium over its predecessor in the process, we give the Ryzen 7 9850X3D our coveted gold award.

pcper gold award

Review Disclosures

This is what we consider the responsible disclosure of our review policies and procedures.

How Product Was Obtained

The product was provided by AMD for the purpose of this review.

Company Involvement

AMD had no control over the content of the review and was not consulted prior to publication.

PC Perspective Compensation

Neither PC Perspective nor any of its staff were paid or compensated in any way by AMD for this review.

Advertising Disclosure

AMD has not purchased advertising at PC Perspective during the past twelve months.

Affiliate Links

If this article contains affiliate links to online retailers, PC Perspective may receive compensation for purchases through those links.

Video News

About The Author

Sebastian Peak

Editor-in-Chief at PC Perspective. Writer of computer stuff, vintage PC nerd, and full-time dad. Still in search of the perfect smartphone. In his nonexistent spare time Sebastian's hobbies include hi-fi audio, guitars, and road bikes. Currently investigating time travel.

2 Comments

  1. nAMARIE

    I am gaming on AM5 with a 9700X/5080 on a 4K ultrawide. This processor does not excite me but I appreciated the review. Thanks and I love your podcasts.

    Reply
    • Sebastian Peak

      Thanks for listening the podcast! And yeah, incremental upgrades are not exciting. AMD is king now and they don’t have to do much to keep their massive lead.

      Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest Podcasts

Archive & Timeline

Previous 12 months
Explore: All The Years!