AES-128 Will Survive Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers
Math Doesn’t Lie
Ars Technica posted a bit of a delve into the math behind using a quantum computer to break AES-128 encryption and the news is good. The rumour has always been that QRQC will halve the amount of work needed to crack algorithms like AES-128, rendering it relatively quick to crack and that we would have to use AES-256 at the very least. However, that math does not check out.
Two mathematicians tried to express the somewhat complex math by using much smaller numbers. Instead of the 3.4 x 10^38 possible combinations that AES-128 boasts, they reduced it to a possible 256 combinations for their examples. If you split the work four ways, then each of you could try 32 combinations which is a reasonable amount of work. However quantum computers do not behave the same as classic computers and when you assign several of them parallel tasks they use Grover’s algorithm to split the work. If you break apart the task between several quantum computers, the amount of tries they have to chew through ends up being the same, not half the tried as the doomsayers have been predicting.
Follow the link to read “Quantum Computers Are Not a Threat to 128-bit Symmetric Keys” if you want to read a proper explanation of why AES-128 is not going anywhere … yet.
“What makes Grover special is that as you parallelize it, its advantage over non-quantum algorithms gets smaller,” Valsorda said in an interview.
More Tech News From Around The Web
- CISA flags new SD-WAN flaw as actively exploited in attacks @ Bleeping Computer
- Actively exploited Apache ActiveMQ flaw impacts 6,400 servers @ Bleeping Computer
- Microsoft releases Windows Server update fix to fix its April update fixes @ The Register
- Apple CEO Tim Cook Is Stepping Down @ Slashdot
- Linux 7.1 will have an optional new NTFS driver @ The Register
- Deezer Says 44% of Songs Uploaded To Its Platform Daily Are AI-Generated @ Slashdot
- Flipper Zero Transmits APRS With No Extra Parts @ Hackaday


